EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hans-Joachim Bieg
dblp:23/6037
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-3291-2683ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 77% Wearable and physiological sensing · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction › automation
automation levels |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From Driver to Supervisor: Comparing Cognitive Load and EEG-Based Attentional Resource Allocation Across Automation Levels · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | I See What You See: Inferring Sensor and Policy Models of Human Real-World Motor Behavior · AAAI 2017 |
Wearable and physiological sensing
electroencephalography |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | From Driver to Supervisor: Comparing Cognitive Load and EEG-Based Attentional Resource Allocation Across Automation Levels · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › optimal control
linear quadratic gaussian control |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | I See What You See: Inferring Sensor and Policy Models of Human Real-World Motor Behavior · AAAI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cognitive load measurement · 0.8EEG-based attentional resource allocation · 0.8structural estimation · 0.3inverse reinforcement learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | From Driver to Supervisor: Comparing Cognitive Load and EEG-Based Attentional Resource Allocation Across Automation Levels
Nikol Figalová, Hans-Joachim Bieg, Julian Elias Reiser, Yuan-Cheng Liu, Martin Baumann 0001, Lewis L. Chuang, Olga Pollatos |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 2 |
| 2022 | Comparison of Video-based Driver Gaze Region Estimation TechniquesabstractMethods to estimate a driver’s visual attention from video images have received increased research interest. Such methods are especially important for detecting inattentive drivers in partially automated vehicles. The current study compares different driver gaze region estimation techniques, which may serve as a basis for detecting inattentive drivers. The accuracy of these techniques was evaluated on data from automated drives in a driving simulator. The examined techniques include a classical, state-of-the-art eye tracking approach, two data-driven approaches that rely on eye tracking data, a data-driven approach that only considers the driver’s facial configuration, and an end-to-end approach based on a convolutional neural network. The results showcase the advantages of data-driven approaches over a classical geometric interpretation of the eye tracking data. The results also highlight challenges regarding generalization for purely data-driven approaches and the benefits of data-driven approaches that operate on eye tracking data rather than video image data alone. Hans-Joachim Bieg, Simon Strobel, Matthias S. Fischer, Paula Laßmann |
IV | 1 |
| 2017 | I See What You See: Inferring Sensor and Policy Models of Human Real-World Motor BehaviorabstractHuman motor behavior is naturally guided by sensing the environment. To predict such sensori-motor behavior, it is necessary to model what is sensed and how actions are chosen based on the obtained sensory measurements. Although several models of human sensing haven been proposed, rarely data of the assumed sensory measurements is available. This makes statistical estimation of sensor models problematic. To overcome this issue, we propose an abstract structural estimation approach building on the ideas of Herman et al.'s Simultaneous Estimation of Rewards and Dynamics (SERD). Assuming optimal fusion of sensory information and rational choice of actions the proposed method allows to infer sensor models even in absence of data of the sensory measurements. To the best of our knowledge, this work presents the first general approach for joint inference of sensor and policy models. Furthermore, we consider its concrete implementation in the important class of sensor scheduling linear quadratic Gaussian problems. Finally, the effectiveness of the approach is demonstrated for prediction of the behavior of automobile drivers. Specifically, we model the glance and steering behavior of driving in the presence of visually demanding secondary tasks. The results show, that prediction benefits from the inference of sensor models. This is the case, especially, if also information is considered, that is contained in gaze switching behavior. Felix Schmitt 0001, Hans-Joachim Bieg, Michael Herman, Constantin A. Rothkopf |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2016 | Predicting lane keeping behavior of visually distracted drivers using inverse suboptimal controlabstractDriver distraction strongly contributes to crash-risk. Therefore, assistance systems that warn drivers if their distraction poses a hazard to road safety, promise a great safety benefit. Current approaches either seek to detect critical situations using environmental sensors or estimate a driver's attention state solely from his/her behavior. However, this neglects that driving situation, driver deficiencies and compensation strategies altogether determine the risk of an accident. This work proposes to use inverse suboptimal control to predict these aspects in visually distracted lane keeping. In contrast to other approaches, this allows a situation-dependent assessment of the risk posed by distraction. Real traffic data of seven drivers are used for evaluation of the predictive power of our approach. For comparison, a baseline was built using established behavior models. In the evaluation our method achieves a consistently lower prediction error over speed and track-topology variations. Additionally, our approach generalizes better to driving speeds unseen in training phase. Felix Schmitt 0001, Hans-Joachim Bieg, Dietrich Manstetten, Michael Herman, Rainer Stiefelhagen |
Intelligent Vehicles Symposium | 2 |
| 2016 | Exact Maximum Entropy Inverse Optimal Control for modeling human attention switching and controlabstractMaximum Causal Entropy (MCE) Inverse Optimal Control (IOC) has become an effective tool for modeling human behavior in many control tasks. Its advantage over classic techniques for estimating human policies is the transferability of the inferred objectives: Behavior can be predicted in variations of the control task by policy computation using a relaxed optimality criterion. However, exact policy inference is often computationally intractable in control problems with imperfect state observation. In this work, we present a model class that allows modeling human control of two tasks of which only one be perfectly observed at a time requiring attention switching. We show how efficient and exact objective and policy inference via MCE can be conducted for these control problems. Both MCE-IOC and Maximum Causal Likelihood (MCL)-IOC, a variant of the original MCE approach, as well as Direct Policy Estimation (DPE) are evaluated using simulated and real behavioral data. Prediction error and generalization over changes in the control process are both considered in the evaluation. The results show a clear advantage of both IOC methods over DPE, especially in the transfer over variation of the control process. MCE and MCL performed similar when training on a large set of simulated data, but differed significantly on small sets and real data. Felix Schmitt 0001, Hans-Joachim Bieg, Dietrich Manstetten, Michael Herman, Rainer Stiefelhagen |
SMC | 2 |
| 2010 | Eye and pointer coordination in search and selection tasksabstractSelecting a graphical item by pointing with a computer mouse is a ubiquitous task in many graphical user interfaces. Several techniques have been suggested to facilitate this task, for instance, by reducing the required movement distance. Here we measure the natural coordination of eye and mouse pointer control across several search and selection tasks. We find that users automatically minimize the distance to likely targets in an intelligent, task dependent way. When target location is highly predictable, top-down knowledge can enable users to initiate pointer movements prior to target fixation. These findings question the utility of existing assistive pointing techniques and suggest that alternative approaches might be more effective. Hans-Joachim Bieg, Lewis L. Chuang, Roland W. Fleming, Harald Reiterer, Heinrich H. Bülthoff |
ETRA | 1 |
| 2009 | Gaze-Assisted Pointing for Wall-Sized Displays
Hans-Joachim Bieg, Lewis L. Chuang, Harald Reiterer |
INTERACT (2) | 1 |