Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian Dalessandro
dblp:23/7121
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Data mining · 51% Information retrieval · 31% Machine learning and data management · 8% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 87% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
online advertising |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | Scalable hands-free transfer learning for online advertising · KDD 2014 Using co-visitation networks for detecting large scale online display advertising exchange fraud · KDD 2013 |
Information retrieval › online advertising
ad targeting |
0.2 | 2 | 2014 | Scalable hands-free transfer learning for online advertising · KDD 2014 Scalable supervised dimensionality reduction using clustering · KDD 2013 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Scalable hands-free transfer learning for online advertising · KDD 2014 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Scalable hands-free transfer learning for online advertising · KDD 2014 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Using co-visitation networks for detecting large scale online display advertising exchange fraud · KDD 2013 |
Data mining › anomaly detection › fraud detection
click fraud detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Using co-visitation networks for detecting large scale online display advertising exchange fraud · KDD 2013 |
Data mining
dimensionality reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Scalable supervised dimensionality reduction using clustering · KDD 2013 |
Data mining › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Scalable supervised dimensionality reduction using clustering · KDD 2013 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
supervised dimensionality reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Scalable supervised dimensionality reduction using clustering · KDD 2013 |
Computational finance and economics › online advertising
auto-bidding |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Bid optimizing and inventory scoring in targeted online advertising · KDD 2012 |
Computational finance and economics
online advertising |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Bid optimizing and inventory scoring in targeted online advertising · KDD 2012 |
Computational finance and economics › online advertising
real-time bidding |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Bid optimizing and inventory scoring in targeted online advertising · KDD 2012 |
Machine learning and data management › machine learning systems
production machine learning system |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Design principles of massive, robust prediction systems · KDD 2012 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Audience selection for on-line brand advertising: privacy-friendly social network targeting · KDD 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian classification
bayesian logistic regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Scalable hands-free transfer learning for online advertising · KDD 2014 |
Network security
traffic analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Using co-visitation networks for detecting large scale online display advertising exchange fraud · KDD 2013 |
Computational finance and economics › mechanism design
auction theory |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Bid optimizing and inventory scoring in targeted online advertising · KDD 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 0.4stochastic gradient descent · 0.4bayesian logistic regression · 0.4adaptive regularization · 0.4co-visitation network · 0.3classifier · 0.3quasi-social network extraction · 0.2predictive-modeling holdout evaluation · 0.2hierarchical clustering · 0.2supervised learning · 0.1second-price auction theory · 0.1quality control processes · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Scalable hands-free transfer learning for online advertisingabstractInternet display advertising is a critical revenue source for publishers and online content providers, and is supported by massive amounts of user and publisher data. Targeting display ads can be improved substantially with machine learning methods, but building many models on massive data becomes prohibitively expensive computationally. This paper presents a combination of strategies, deployed by the online advertising firm Dstillery, for learning many models from extremely high-dimensional data efficiently and without human intervention. This combination includes: (i)~A method for simple-yet-effective transfer learning where a model learned from data that is relatively abundant and cheap is taken as a prior for Bayesian logistic regression trained with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) from the more expensive target data. (ii)~A new update rule for automatic learning rate adaptation, to support learning from sparse, high-dimensional data, as well as the integration with adaptive regularization. We present an experimental analysis across 100 different ad campaigns, showing that the transfer learning indeed improves performance across a large number of them, especially at the start of the campaigns. The combined "hands-free" method needs no fiddling with the SGD learning rate, and we show that it is just as effective as using expensive grid search to set the regularization parameter for each campaign. Brian Dalessandro, Daizhuo Chen, Troy Raeder, Claudia Perlich, Melinda Han Williams, Foster J. Provost |
KDD | 1 |
| 2014 | Machine learning for targeted display advertising: transfer learning in action
Claudia Perlich, Brian Dalessandro, Troy Raeder, Ori Stitelman, Foster J. Provost |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2013 | The Microsoft Academic Search challenges at KDD Cup 2013abstractMicrosoft Academic Search is a free search engine specific to scholarly material. It currently covers more than 50 million publications and over 19 million authors across a variety of domains. One of the main challenges in correctly indexing this material is author name ambiguity and the resulting noise in author profiles. KDD Cup 2013 invited participants to tackle this problem in 2 ways: (1) by automatically determining which papers in an author profile are truly written by a given author, and (2) by identifying which author profiles need to be merged because they belong to the same author. This paper presents a brief account of the contest and the lessons learned. Martine De Cock, Senjuti Basu Roy, Swapna Savvana, Vani Mandava, Brian Dalessandro, Claudia Perlich, Will Cukierski, Benjamin Hamner |
IEEE BigData | 5 |
| 2013 | Scalable supervised dimensionality reduction using clusteringabstractThe automated targeting of online display ads at scale requires the simultaneous evaluation of a single prospect against many independent models. When deciding which ad to show to a user, one must calculate likelihood-to-convert scores for that user across all potential advertisers in the system. For modern machine-learning-based targeting, as conducted by Media6Degrees (M6D), this can mean scoring against thousands of models in a large, sparse feature space. Dimensionality reduction within this space is useful, as it decreases scoring time and model storage requirements. To meet this need, we develop a novel algorithm for scalable supervised dimensionality reduction across hundreds of simultaneous classification tasks. The algorithm performs hierarchical clustering in the space of model parameters from historical models in order to collapse related features into a single dimension. This allows us to implicitly incorporate feature and label data across all tasks without operating directly in a massive space. We present experimental results showing that for this task our algorithm outperforms other popular dimensionality-reduction algorithms across a wide variety of ad campaigns, as well as production results that showcase its performance in practice. Troy Raeder, Claudia Perlich, Brian Dalessandro, Ori Stitelman, Foster J. Provost |
KDD | 3 |
| 2013 | Using co-visitation networks for detecting large scale online display advertising exchange fraudabstractData generated by observing the actions of web browsers across the internet is being used at an ever increasing rate for both building models and making decisions. In fact, a quarter of the industry-track papers for KDD in 2012 were based on data generated by online actions. The models, analytics and decisions they inform all stem from the assumption that observed data captures the intent of users. However, a large portion of these observed actions are not intentional, and are effectively polluting the models. Much of this observed activity is either generated by robots traversing the internet or the result of unintended actions of real users. These non-intentional actions observed in the web logs severely bias both analytics and the models created from the data. In this paper, we will show examples of how non-intentional traffic that is produced by fraudulent activities adversely affects both general analytics and predictive models, and propose an approach using co-visitation networks to identify sites that have large amounts of this fraudulent traffic. We will then show how this approach, along with a second stage classifier that identifies non-intentional traffic at the browser level, is deployed in production at Media6Degrees (m6d), a targeting technology company for display advertising. This deployed product acts both to filter out the fraudulent traffic from the input data and to insure that we don't serve ads during unintended website visits. Ori Stitelman, Claudia Perlich, Brian Dalessandro, Rod Hook, Troy Raeder, Foster J. Provost |
KDD | 3 |
| 2012 | Bid optimizing and inventory scoring in targeted online advertisingabstractBillions of online display advertising spots are purchased on a daily basis through real time bidding exchanges (RTBs). Advertising companies bid for these spots on behalf of a company or brand in order to purchase these spots to display banner advertisements. These bidding decisions must be made in fractions of a second after the potential purchaser is informed of what location (Internet site) has a spot available and who would see the advertisement. The entire transaction must be completed in near real-time to avoid delays loading the page and maintain a good users experience. This paper presents a bid-optimization approach that is implemented in production at Media6Degrees for bidding on these advertising opportunities at an appropriate price. The approach combines several supervised learning algorithms, as well as second price auction theory, to determine the correct price to ensure that the right message is delivered to the right person, at the right time. Claudia Perlich, Brian Dalessandro, Rod Hook, Ori Stitelman, Troy Raeder, Foster J. Provost |
KDD | 2 |
| 2012 | Design principles of massive, robust prediction systemsabstractMost data mining research is concerned with building high-quality classification models in isolation. In massive production systems, however, the ability to monitor and maintain performance over time while growing in size and scope is equally important. Many external factors may degrade classification performance including changes in data distribution, noise or bias in the source data, and the evolution of the system itself. A well-functioning system must gracefully handle all of these. This paper lays out a set of design principles for large-scale autonomous data mining systems and then demonstrates our application of these principles within the m6d automated ad targeting system. We demonstrate a comprehensive set of quality control processes that allow us monitor and maintain thousands of distinct classification models automatically, and to add new models, take on new data, and correct poorly-performing models without manual intervention or system disruption. Troy Raeder, Ori Stitelman, Brian Dalessandro, Claudia Perlich, Foster J. Provost |
KDD | 3 |
| 2009 | Audience selection for on-line brand advertising: privacy-friendly social network targetingabstractThis paper describes and evaluates privacy-friendly methods for extracting quasi-social networks from browser behavior on user-generated content sites, for the purpose of finding good audiences for brand advertising (as opposed to click maximizing, for example). Targeting social-network neighbors resonates well with advertisers, and on-line browsing behavior data counterintuitively can allow the identification of good audiences anonymously. Besides being one of the first papers to our knowledge on data mining for on-line brand advertising, this paper makes several important contributions. We introduce a framework for evaluating brand audiences, in analogy to predictive-modeling holdout evaluation. We introduce methods for extracting quasi-social networks from data on visitations to social networking pages, without collecting any information on the identities of the browsers or the content of the social-network pages. We introduce measures of brand proximity in the network, and show that audiences with high brand proximity indeed show substantially higher brand affinity. Finally, we provide evidence that the quasi-social network embeds a true social network, which along with results from social theory offers one explanation for the increase in brand affinity of the selected audiences. Foster J. Provost, Brian Dalessandro, Rod Hook, Alan Murray |
KDD | 2 |