Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Helen Lu
dblp:23/8922
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Image recognition and object detection · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Test-time Augmentation Improves Efficiency in Conformal Prediction · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Test-time Augmentation Improves Efficiency in Conformal Prediction · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
test-time augmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Test-time Augmentation Improves Efficiency in Conformal Prediction · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
test-time augmentation · 0.9conformal scoring · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Test-time Augmentation Improves Efficiency in Conformal PredictionabstractA conformal classifier produces a set of predicted classes and provides a probabilistic guarantee that the set includes the true class. Unfortunately, it is often the case that conformal classifiers produce uninformatively large sets. In this work, we show that test-time augmentation (TTA)-a technique that introduces inductive biases during inference-reduces the size of the sets produced by conformal classifiers. Our approach is flexible, computationally efficient, and effective. It can be combined with any conformal score, requires no model retraining, and reduces prediction set sizes by 10%-14% on average. We conduct an evaluation of the approach spanning three datasets, three models, two established conformal scoring methods, different guarantee strengths, and several distribution shifts to show when and why test-time augmentation is a useful addition to the conformal pipeline. Divya Shanmugam, Helen Lu, Swami Sankaranarayanan, John V. Guttag |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2010 | A Framework for Delivering Personalized e-Government Tourism Services
Malak Al-hassan, Helen Lu, Jie Lu 0001 |
WEBIST (2) | 2 |