Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Helen Lu

dblp:23/8922 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Image recognition and object detection · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
0.912025
Test-time Augmentation Improves Efficiency in Conformal Prediction · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.912025
Test-time Augmentation Improves Efficiency in Conformal Prediction · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
test-time augmentation
0.312025
Test-time Augmentation Improves Efficiency in Conformal Prediction · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test-time augmentation · 0.9conformal scoring · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Test-time Augmentation Improves Efficiency in Conformal Prediction
abstract
A conformal classifier produces a set of predicted classes and provides a probabilistic guarantee that the set includes the true class. Unfortunately, it is often the case that conformal classifiers produce uninformatively large sets. In this work, we show that test-time augmentation (TTA)-a technique that introduces inductive biases during inference-reduces the size of the sets produced by conformal classifiers. Our approach is flexible, computationally efficient, and effective. It can be combined with any conformal score, requires no model retraining, and reduces prediction set sizes by 10%-14% on average. We conduct an evaluation of the approach spanning three datasets, three models, two established conformal scoring methods, different guarantee strengths, and several distribution shifts to show when and why test-time augmentation is a useful addition to the conformal pipeline.
Divya Shanmugam, Helen Lu, Swami Sankaranarayanan, John V. Guttag
CVPR2
2010 A Framework for Delivering Personalized e-Government Tourism Services
Malak Al-hassan, Helen Lu, Jie Lu 0001
WEBIST (2)2