Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bevan K. Jones
dblp:23/9014
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automata and formal languages · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 36% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 27% Language models and text generation · 27% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automata and formal languages
graph grammars |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Parsing Graphs with Hyperedge Replacement Grammars · ACL (1) 2013 |
Automata and formal languages › graph grammars
graph parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Parsing Graphs with Hyperedge Replacement Grammars · ACL (1) 2013 |
Automata and formal languages › graph grammars
hyperedge replacement grammar |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Parsing Graphs with Hyperedge Replacement Grammars · ACL (1) 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Semantic Parsing with Bayesian Tree Transducers · ACL (1) 2012 |
Automata and formal languages
grammatical inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Reducing Grounded Learning Tasks To Grammatical Inference · EMNLP 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Synergies in learning words and their referents · NIPS 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language acquisition |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Synergies in learning words and their referents · NIPS 2010 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
grounded language learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Reducing Grounded Learning Tasks To Grammatical Inference · EMNLP 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
grammatical inference · 0.2bayesian tree transducers · 0.1topic model · 0.1bayesian nonparametric modeling · 0.1PCFG · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Parsing Graphs with Hyperedge Replacement Grammars
David Chiang 0001, Jacob Andreas, Daniel Bauer 0002, Karl Moritz Hermann, Bevan K. Jones, Kevin Knight |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2012 | Semantic Parsing with Bayesian Tree Transducers
Bevan K. Jones, Mark Johnson 0001, Sharon Goldwater |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2012 | Semantics-Based Machine Translation with Hyperedge Replacement Grammars
Bevan K. Jones, Jacob Andreas, Daniel Bauer 0002, Karl Moritz Hermann, Kevin Knight |
COLING | 1 |
| 2011 | Reducing Grounded Learning Tasks To Grammatical Inference
Benjamin Börschinger, Bevan K. Jones, Mark Johnson 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2010 | Learning Words and Their Meanings from Unsegmented Child-directed Speech
Bevan K. Jones, Mark Johnson 0001, Michael C. Frank |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2010 | Synergies in learning words and their referentsabstractThis paper presents Bayesian non-parametric models that simultaneously learn to segment words from phoneme strings and learn the referents of some of those words, and shows that there is a synergistic interaction in the acquisition of these two kinds of linguistic information. The models themselves are novel kinds of Adaptor Grammars that are an extension of an embedding of topic models into PCFGs. These models simultaneously segment phoneme sequences into words and learn the relationship between non-linguistic objects to the words that refer to them. We show (i) that modelling inter-word dependencies not only improves the accuracy of the word segmentation but also of word-object relationships, and (ii) that a model that simultaneously learns word-object relationships and word segmentation segments more accurately than one that just learns word segmentation on its own. We argue that these results support an interactive view of language acquisition that can take advantage of synergies such as these. Mark Johnson 0001, Katherine Demuth, Michael C. Frank, Bevan K. Jones |
NIPS | 4 |