EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicki Skafte Detlefsen
dblp:230/1348
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-8133-682XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 34% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Laplacian Autoencoders for Learning Stochastic Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Laplacian Autoencoders for Learning Stochastic Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Laplacian Autoencoders for Learning Stochastic Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Laplacian Autoencoders for Learning Stochastic Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Laplacian Autoencoders for Learning Stochastic Representations · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
spatial transformer network |
0.4 | 2 | 2019 | Deep Diffeomorphic Transformer Networks · CVPR 2018 Explicit Disentanglement of Appearance and Perspective in Generative Models · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › image registration
diffeomorphic registration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment Nets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Explicit Disentanglement of Appearance and Perspective in Generative Models · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Reliable training and estimation of variance networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
invertible transformation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment Nets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression › probabilistic regression
predictive variance estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Reliable training and estimation of variance networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series signal processing
time-series alignment |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment Nets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time warping |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment Nets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Reliable training and estimation of variance networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Explicit Disentanglement of Appearance and Perspective in Generative Models · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
image registration |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Diffeomorphic Transformer Networks · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › supervised learning
neural network regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Reliable training and estimation of variance networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition
face verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Diffeomorphic Transformer Networks · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffeomorphic transformation · 0.7variational lower bound · 0.6hessian approximation · 0.6Monte Carlo EM · 0.6weight update · 0.4variational autoencoder · 0.4variance networks · 0.4spatial transformer · 0.4minibatching · 0.4gaussian process posterior · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Laplacian Autoencoders for Learning Stochastic RepresentationsabstractEstablished methods for unsupervised representation learning such as variational autoencoders produce none or poorly calibrated uncertainty estimates making it difficult to evaluate if learned representations are stable and reliable. In this work, we present a Bayesian autoencoder for unsupervised representation learning, which is trained using a novel variational lower-bound of the autoencoder evidence. This is maximized using Monte Carlo EM with a variational distribution that takes the shape of a Laplace approximation. We develop a new Hessian approximation that scales linearly with data size allowing us to model high-dimensional data. Empirically, we show that our Laplacian autoencoder estimates well-calibrated uncertainties in both latent and output space. We demonstrate that this results in improved performance across a multitude of downstream tasks. Marco Miani, Frederik Warburg, Pablo Moreno-Muñoz, Nicki Skafte Detlefsen, Søren Hauberg |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2019 | Explicit Disentanglement of Appearance and Perspective in Generative ModelsabstractDisentangled representation learning finds compact, independent and easy-to-interpret factors of the data. Learning such has been shown to require an inductive bias, which we explicitly encode in a generative model of images. Specifically, we propose a model with two latent spaces: one that represents spatial transformations of the input data, and another that represents the transformed data. We find that the latter naturally captures the intrinsic appearance of the data. To realize the generative model, we propose a Variationally Inferred Transformational Autoencoder (VITAE) that incorporates a spatial ransformer into a variational autoencoder. We show how to perform inference in the model efficiently by carefully designing the encoders and restricting the transformation class to be diffeomorphic. Empirically, our model separates the visual style from digit type on MNIST, separates shape and pose in images of human bodies and facial features from facial shape on CelebA. Nicki Skafte Detlefsen, Søren Hauberg |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Reliable training and estimation of variance networksabstractWe propose and investigate new complementary methodologies for estimating predictive variance networks in regression neural networks. We derive a locally aware mini-batching scheme that results in sparse robust gradients, and we show how to make unbiased weight updates to a variance network. Further, we formulate a heuristic for robustly fitting both the mean and variance networks post hoc. Finally, we take inspiration from posterior Gaussian processes and propose a network architecture with similar extrapolation properties to Gaussian processes. The proposed methodologies are complementary, and improve upon baseline methods individually. Experimentally, we investigate the impact of predictive uncertainty on multiple datasets and tasks ranging from regression, active learning and generative modeling. Experiments consistently show significant improvements in predictive uncertainty estimation over state-of-the-art methods across tasks and datasets. Nicki Skafte Detlefsen, Martin Jørgensen, Søren Hauberg |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment NetsabstractTime-series analysis is confounded by nonlinear time warping of the data. Traditional methods for joint alignment do not generalize: after aligning a given signal ensemble, they lack a mechanism, that does not require solving a new optimization problem, to align previously-unseen signals. In the multi-class case, they must also first classify the test data before aligning it. Here we propose the Diffeomorphic Temporal alignment Net (DTAN), a learning-based method for time-series joint alignment. Via flexible temporal transformer layers, DTAN learns and applies an input-dependent nonlinear time warping to its input signal. Once learned, DTAN easily aligns previously-unseen signals by its inexpensive forward pass. In a single-class case, the method is unsupervised: the ground-truth alignments are unknown. In the multi-class case, it is semi-supervised in the sense that class labels (but not the ground-truth alignments) are used during learning; in test time, however, the class labels are unknown. As we show, DTAN not only outperforms existing joint-alignment methods in aligning training data but also generalizes well to test data. Our code is available at https://github.com/BGU-CS-VIL/dtan. Ron Shapira Weber, Matan Eyal, Nicki Skafte Detlefsen, Oren Shriki, Oren Freifeld |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2018 | Deep Diffeomorphic Transformer NetworksabstractSpatial Transformer layers allow neural networks, at least in principle, to be invariant to large spatial transformations in image data. The model has, however, seen limited uptake as most practical implementations support only transformations that are too restricted, e.g. affine or homographic maps, and/or destructive maps, such as thin plate splines. We investigate the use of flexible diffeomorphic image transformations within such networks and demonstrate that significant performance gains can be attained over currently-used models. The learned transformations are found to be both simple and intuitive, thereby providing insights into individual problem domains. With the proposed framework, a standard convolutional neural network matches state-of-the-art results on face verification with only two extra lines of simple TensorFlow code. Nicki Skafte Detlefsen, Oren Freifeld, Søren Hauberg |
CVPR | 1 |