Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dennis Madsen
dblp:230/1353
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2099-6880ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 92% Medical and health informatics · 8% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 55% Language models and text generation · 29% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
DNA language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful Tasks · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
post-translational modification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DeepPeptide predicts cleaved peptides in proteins using conditional random fields · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DeepPeptide predicts cleaved peptides in proteins using conditional random fields · Bioinform. 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › 3d registration
surface registration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Closest Point Proposal for MCMC-based Probabilistic Surface Registration · ECCV (17) 2020 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › data-driven shape modeling
statistical shape model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Probabilistic Joint Face-Skull Modelling for Facial Reconstruction · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | A Closest Point Proposal for MCMC-based Probabilistic Surface Registration · ECCV (17) 2020 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape registration |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Probabilistic Joint Face-Skull Modelling for Facial Reconstruction · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov chain monte carlo · 1.1language model embeddings · 0.8language model embedding · 0.8stochastic optimization · 0.7metropolis-hastings · 0.7deep learning · 0.7conditional random field · 0.7closest point proposal · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Beyond benchmarks: Towards robust artificial intelligence bone segmentation in socio-technical systemsabstractDespite the advances in automated medical image segmentation, AI models still underperform in various clinical settings, posing challenges for integration into real-world workflows. In this pre-registered prospective multicenter evaluation, we analyzed 20 state-of-the-art mandibular segmentation models across 19,218 segmentations of 1,000 clinically resampled CT/CBCT scans. Our results suggest that for a given model, segmentation accuracy can vary by up to 25% in Dice score as socio-technical factors such as voxel size, bone orientation, and patient conditions (e.g., osteosynthesis or pathology) shift from favorable to adverse. Higher sharpness, isotropic smaller voxels, and neutral orientation significantly improved results, while metallic osteosynthesis and anatomical complexity led to significant degradation. Our findings challenge the common view of AI models as “plug-and-play” tools and suggest evidence-based optimization recommendations for both clinicians and developers. This will in turn boost the integration of AI segmentation tools in routine healthcare. Kunpeng Xie, Lennart Johannes Gruber, Martin Crampen, Elias Tappeiner, Maxime Gillot, Jan Schepers, Jiangchang Xu, Tobias Pankert, Michel Beyer, Negar Shahamiri, Reinier ten Brink, Gauthier Dot, Charlotte Weschke, Niels van Nistelrooij, Pieter-Jan Verhelst, Zhibin Xu, Jonas Bienzeisler, Ashkan Rashad, Tabea Flügge, Ross Cotton, Shankeeth Vinayahalingam, Robert R. Ilesan, Stefan Raith, Dennis Madsen, Constantin Seibold, Tong Xi 0001, Stefaan Bergé, Sven Nebelung, Oldrich Kodym, Osku Sundqvist, Florian M. Thieringer, Hans Lamecker, Antoine Coppens, Thomas Potrusil, Joep Kraeima, Max J. H. Witjes, Guomin Wu, Xiaojun Chen 0003, Adriaan Lambrechts, Stefan Zachow, Alexander Hermans, Daniel Truhn, Victor Alves, Jan Egger, Rainer Röhrig, Frank Hölzle, Behrus Hinrichs-Puladi |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 27 |
| 2024 | BEND: Benchmarking DNA Language Models on Biologically Meaningful TasksabstractThe genome sequence contains the blueprint for governing cellular processes.
While the availability of genomes has vastly increased over the last decades, experimental annotation of the various functional, non-coding and regulatory elements encoded in the DNA sequence remains both expensive and challenging. This has sparked interest in unsupervised language modeling of genomic DNA, a paradigm that has seen great success for protein sequence data.
Although various DNA language models have been proposed, evaluation tasks often differ between individual works, and might not fully recapitulate the fundamental challenges of genome annotation, including the length, scale and sparsity of the data. In this study, we introduce **BEND**, a **BEN**chmark for **D**NA language models, featuring
a collection of realistic and biologically meaningful downstream tasks defined on the human genome.
We find that embeddings from current DNA LMs can approach performance of expert methods on some tasks, but only capture limited information about long-range features.
BEND is available at https://github.com/frederikkemarin/BEND. Frederikke Isa Marin, Felix Teufel, Marc Horlacher, Dennis Madsen, Dennis Pultz, Ole Winther, Wouter Boomsma |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2023 | DeepPeptide predicts cleaved peptides in proteins using conditional random fieldsabstractMOTIVATION: Peptides are ubiquitous throughout life and involved in a wide range of biological processes, ranging from neural signaling in higher organisms to antimicrobial peptides in bacteria. Many peptides are generated post-translationally by cleavage of precursor proteins and can thus not be detected directly from genomics data, as the specificities of the responsible proteases are often not completely understood. RESULTS: We present DeepPeptide, a deep learning model that predicts cleaved peptides directly from the amino acid sequence. DeepPeptide shows both improved precision and recall for peptide detection compared to previous methodology. We show that the model is capable of identifying peptides in underannotated proteomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DeepPeptide is available online at ku.biolib.com/DeepPeptide. Felix Teufel, Jan C. Refsgaard, Christian T. Madsen, Carsten Stahlhut, Mads Grønborg, Ole Winther, Dennis Madsen |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2021 | Sequential Gaussian Process Regression for Simultaneous Pathology Detection and Shape Reconstruction
Dana Rahbani, Andreas Morel-Forster, Dennis Madsen, Jonathan Aellen, Thomas Vetter |
MICCAI (5) | 3 |
| 2020 | A Closest Point Proposal for MCMC-based Probabilistic Surface Registration
Dennis Madsen, Andreas Morel-Forster, Patrick Kahr, Dana Rahbani, Thomas Vetter, Marcel Lüthi |
ECCV (17) | 1 |
| 2018 | Probabilistic Joint Face-Skull Modelling for Facial ReconstructionabstractWe present a novel method for co-registration of two independent statistical shape models. We solve the problem of aligning a face model to a skull model with stochastic optimization based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We create a probabilistic joint face-skull model and show how to obtain a distribution of plausible face shapes given a skull shape. Due to environmental and genetic factors, there exists a distribution of possible face shapes arising from the same skull. We pose facial reconstruction as a conditional distribution of plausible face shapes given a skull shape. Because it is very difficult to obtain the distribution directly from MRI or CT data, we create a dataset of artificial face-skull pairs. To do this, we propose to combine three data sources of independent origin to model the joint face-skull distribution: a face shape model, a skull shape model and tissue depth marker information. For a given skull, we compute the posterior distribution of faces matching the tissue depth distribution with Metropolis-Hastings. We estimate the joint face-skull distribution from samples of the posterior. To find faces matching to an unknown skull, we estimate the probability of the face under the joint face-skull model. To our knowledge, we are the first to provide a whole distribution of plausible faces arising from a skull instead of only a single reconstruction. We show how the face-skull model can be used to rank a face dataset and on average successfully identify the correct match in top 30%. The face ranking even works when obtaining the face shapes from 2D images. We furthermore show how the face-skull model can be useful to estimate the skull position in an MR-image. Dennis Madsen, Marcel Lüthi, Thomas Vetter |
CVPR | 1 |