Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junpeng Zha

dblp:230/2480 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Concurrent programming · 61% Compilers and program optimization · 39%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization › compiler correctness
compiler optimization correctness
0.612022
Verifying optimizations of concurrent programs in the promising semantics · PLDI 2022
Concurrent programming
memory models
0.612022
Verifying optimizations of concurrent programs in the promising semantics · PLDI 2022
Concurrent programming › memory models › weak memory models
promising semantics
0.612022
Verifying optimizations of concurrent programs in the promising semantics · PLDI 2022
Concurrent programming › memory models
weak memory models
0.612022
Verifying optimizations of concurrent programs in the promising semantics · PLDI 2022
Compilers and program optimization
compiler correctness
0.412019
Towards certified separate compilation for concurrent programs · PLDI 2019
Compilers and program optimization
verified compilation
0.412019
Towards certified separate compilation for concurrent programs · PLDI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

program analysis · 0.6operational semantics · 0.6refinement proof · 0.4certified compilation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Verifying optimizations of concurrent programs in the promising semantics
abstract
Weak memory models for concurrent programming languages are expected to admit standard compiler optimizations. However, prior works on verifying optimizations in weak memory models are mostly focused on simple optimizations on small code snippets which satisfy certain syntactic requirements. It receives less attention whether weak memory models can admit real-world optimization algorithms based on program analyses.
Junpeng Zha, Hongjin Liang 0001, Xinyu Feng 0001
PLDI1
2020 Modular Verification of SPARCv8 Code
Junpeng Zha, Xinyu Feng 0001, Lei Qiao 0002
J. Comput. Sci. Technol.1
2019 Towards certified separate compilation for concurrent programs
abstract
Certified separate compilation is important for establishing end-to-end guarantees for certified systems consisting of multiple program modules. There has been much work building certified compilers for sequential programs. In this paper, we propose a language-independent framework consisting of the key semantics components and lemmas that bridge the verification gap between the compilers for sequential programs and those for (race-free) concurrent programs, so that the existing verification work for the former can be reused. One of the key contributions of the framework is a novel footprint-preserving compositional simulation as the compilation correctness criterion. The framework also provides a new mechanism to support confined benign races which are usually found in efficient implementations of synchronization primitives.
Hanru Jiang, Hongjin Liang 0001, Siyang Xiao, Junpeng Zha, Xinyu Feng 0001
PLDI4
2018 Modular Verification of SPARCv8 Code
Junpeng Zha, Xinyu Feng 0001, Lei Qiao 0002
APLAS1