Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keenan Burnett

dblp:230/3648 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7496-1144ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 88% Autonomous driving · 12%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation › trajectory estimation
continuous-time trajectory estimation
0.912025
Continuous-Time Radar-Inertial and Lidar-Inertial Odometry Using a Gaussian Process Motion Prior · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
LiDAR-inertial odometry
0.912025
Continuous-Time Radar-Inertial and Lidar-Inertial Odometry Using a Gaussian Process Motion Prior · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
radar-inertial odometry
0.912025
Continuous-Time Radar-Inertial and Lidar-Inertial Odometry Using a Gaussian Process Motion Prior · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.912025
Continuous-Time Radar-Inertial and Lidar-Inertial Odometry Using a Gaussian Process Motion Prior · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception and planning
0.112019
Building a Winning Self-Driving Car in Six Months · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sliding-window batch estimation · 0.9preintegration · 0.9gaussian process motion prior · 0.9CPU-based real-time algorithms · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Continuous-Time Radar-Inertial and Lidar-Inertial Odometry Using a Gaussian Process Motion Prior
abstract
In this work, we demonstrate continuous-time radar-inertial and lidar-inertial odometry using a Gaussian process motion prior. Using a sparse prior, we demonstrate improved computational complexity during preintegration and interpolation. We use a white-noise-on-acceleration motion prior and treat the gyroscope as a direct measurement of the state while preintegrating accelerometer measurements to form relative velocity factors. Our odometry is implemented using sliding-window batch trajectory estimation. To our knowledge, our work is the first to demonstrate radar-inertial odometry with a spinning mechanical radar using both gyroscope and accelerometer measurements. We improve the performance of our radar odometry by 43% by incorporating an inertial measurement unit. Our approach is efficient and we demonstrate real-time performance. Code for this article can be found at:https://github.com/utiasASRL/steam_icp.
Keenan Burnett, Angela P. Schoellig, Tim D. Barfoot
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2023 Need for Speed: Fast Correspondence-Free Lidar-Inertial Odometry Using Doppler Velocity
abstract
In this paper, we present a fast, lightweight odometry method that uses the Doppler velocity measurements from a Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) lidar without data association. FMCW lidar is a recently emerging technology that enables per-return relative radial velocity measurements via the Doppler effect. Since the Doppler measurement model is linear with respect to the 6-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) vehicle velocity, we can formulate a linear continuous-time estimation problem for the velocity and numerically integrate for the 6-DOF pose estimate afterward. The caveat is that angular velocity is not observable with a single FMCW lidar. We address this limitation by also incorporating the angular velocity measurements from a gyroscope. This results in an extremely efficient odometry method that processes lidar frames at an average wall-clock time of 5.64ms on a single thread, well below the 10Hz operating rate of the lidar we tested. We show experimental results on real-world driving sequences and compare against state-of-the-art Iterative Closest Point (ICP)-based odometry methods, presenting a compelling tradeoff between accuracy and computation. We also present an algebraic observability study, where we demonstrate in theory that the Doppler measurements from multiple FMCW lidars are capable of observing all 6 degrees of freedom (translational and angular velocity).
David J. Yoon, Keenan Burnett, Johann Laconte, Heethesh Vhavle, Sören Kammel, James Reuther, Tim D. Barfoot
IROS2
2019 Building a Winning Self-Driving Car in Six Months
abstract
The SAE AutoDrive Challenge is a three-year competition to develop a Level 4 autonomous vehicle by 2020. The first set of challenges were held in April of 2018 in Yuma, Arizona. Our team (aUToronto/Zeus) placed first. In this paper, we describe Zeus' complete system architecture and specialized algorithms that enabled us to win. We show that it is possible to develop a vehicle with basic autonomy features in just six months relying on simple, robust algorithms. We do not make use of a prior map. Instead, we have developed a multi-sensor visual localization solution. All the algorithms in the paper run in real-time using CPUs only. We also highlight the closed-loop performance of the system in detail in several experiments.
Keenan Burnett, Andreas Schimpe, Sepehr Samavi, Mona Gridseth, Chengzhi Winston Liu, Qiyang Li, Zachary Kroeze, Angela P. Schoellig
ICRA1