Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haochuan Li
dblp:230/3888
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 40% Generative modeling · 27% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 83% Computational complexity · 17% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | TIGeR: Unifying Text-to-Image Generation and Retrieval with Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 SILMM: Self-Improving Large Multimodal Models for Compositional Text-to-Image Generation · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
1.5 | 3 | 2022 | Neural Network Weights Do Not Converge to Stationary Points: An Invariant Measure Perspective · ICML 2022 On Convergence of Gradient Descent Ascent: A Tight Local Analysis · ICML 2022 Convergence of Adversarial Training in Overparametrized Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed Assumptions · NeurIPS 2023 Convex and Non-convex Optimization Under Generalized Smoothness · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › minimax optimization
gradient descent ascent |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Tight Analysis of Extra-gradient and Optimistic Gradient Methods For Nonconvex Minimax Problems · NeurIPS 2022 On Convergence of Gradient Descent Ascent: A Tight Local Analysis · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
minimax optimization |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Tight Analysis of Extra-gradient and Optimistic Gradient Methods For Nonconvex Minimax Problems · NeurIPS 2022 On Convergence of Gradient Descent Ascent: A Tight Local Analysis · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
compositional text-to-image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SILMM: Self-Improving Large Multimodal Models for Compositional Text-to-Image Generation · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SILMM: Self-Improving Large Multimodal Models for Compositional Text-to-Image Generation · CVPR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SILMM: Self-Improving Large Multimodal Models for Compositional Text-to-Image Generation · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TIGeR: Unifying Text-to-Image Generation and Retrieval with Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
cross-modal retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TIGeR: Unifying Text-to-Image Generation and Retrieval with Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval › cross-modal retrieval
text-to-image retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TIGeR: Unifying Text-to-Image Generation and Retrieval with Large Multimodal Models · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Convex and Non-convex Optimization Under Generalized Smoothness · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Convex and Non-convex Optimization Under Generalized Smoothness · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed Assumptions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed Assumptions · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization landscape
stationary points |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Network Weights Do Not Converge to Stationary Points: An Invariant Measure Perspective · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Network Weights Do Not Converge to Stationary Points: An Invariant Measure Perspective · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Complexity Lower Bounds for Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Min-Max Optimization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › minimax optimization
nonconvex-strongly-concave optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Complexity Lower Bounds for Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Min-Max Optimization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computational complexity › complexity classes › approximation classes
optimization complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Complexity Lower Bounds for Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Min-Max Optimization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computational complexity › relativization
oracle lower bounds |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Complexity Lower Bounds for Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Min-Max Optimization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Convergence of Adversarial Training in Overparametrized Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Convergence of Adversarial Training in Overparametrized Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convergence guarantees
gradient descent convergence |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
overparameterized neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Convergence of Adversarial Training in Overparametrized Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
self-improvement |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SILMM: Self-Improving Large Multimodal Models for Compositional Text-to-Image Generation · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Convergence of Adversarial Training in Overparametrized Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
residual network |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large multimodal model · 1.7autoregressive generation · 1.7self-feedback · 0.9kernel-based continuous DPO · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9variance reduction · 0.7nesterov accelerated gradient · 0.7gradient descent · 0.7gradient clipping · 0.7generalized smoothness · 0.7adaptive moment estimation · 0.7stochastic GDA · 0.6lower bounds · 0.6extragradient method · 0.6ergodic theory of dynamical systems · 0.6convergence analysis · 0.6stationarity analysis · 0.5first-order oracle · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SILMM: Self-Improving Large Multimodal Models for Compositional Text-to-Image GenerationabstractLarge Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in multimodal understanding and generation, pushing forward advancements in text-to-image generation. However, achieving accurate text-image alignment for LMMs, particularly in compositional scenarios, remains challenging. Existing approaches, such as layout planning for multi-step generation and learning3 from human feedback or AI feedback, depend heavily on prompt engineering, costly human annotations, and continual upgrading, limiting flexibility and scalability. In this work, we introduce a model-agnostic iterative self-improvement framework (SILMM) that can enable LMMs to provide helpful and scalable self-feedback and optimize text-image alignment via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). DPO can readily applied to LMMs that use discrete visual tokens as intermediate image representations; while it is less suitable for LMMs with continuous visual features, as obtaining generation probabilities is challenging. To adapt SILMM to LMMs with continuous features, we propose a diversity mechanism to obtain diverse representations and a kernel-based continuous DPO for alignment. Extensive experiments on three compositional text-to-image generation benchmarks validate the effectiveness and superiority of SILMM, showing improvements exceeding 30% on T2I-CompBench++ and around 20% on DPG-Bench. The code is available at https://silmm.github.io/. Leigang Qu, Haochuan Li, Wenjie Wang 0007, Xiang Liu 0017, Juncheng Li 0006, Liqiang Nie, Tat-Seng Chua |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2025 | Variance-reduced Clipping for Non-convex OptimizationabstractGradient clipping is a standard training technique used in deep learning applications such as large-scale language modeling to mitigate exploding gradients. Recent experimental studies have demonstrated a fairly special behavior in the smoothness of the training objective along its trajectory when trained with gradient clipping. That is, the smoothness grows with the gradient norm. This is in clear contrast to the wellestablished assumption in folklore non-convex optimization, a.k.a. L–smoothness, where the smoothness is assumed to be bounded by a constant L globally. The recently introduced (L0, L1)– smoothness is a more relaxed notion that captures such behavior in non-convex optimization. It has been shown that under this relaxed smoothness assumption, SGD with clipping requires $\mathcal{O}\left( {{ \in ^{ - 4}}} \right)$ stochastic gradient computations to find an ϵ–stationary solution. In this paper, we employ a variance reduction technique, namely Spider, and demonstrate that for a carefully designed learning rate, this complexity is improved to $\mathcal{O}\left( {{ \in ^{ - 3}}} \right)$ which is order-optimal. Moreover, when the objective is the average of n components, we improve the existing $\mathcal{O}\left( {n{ \in ^{ - 2}}} \right)$ gradient complexity to $\mathcal{O}\left( {\sqrt n { \in ^{ - 2}} + n} \right)$, which is order-optimal as well. Amirhossein Reisizadeh, Haochuan Li, Subhro Das, Ali Jadbabaie |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2025 | TIGeR: Unifying Text-to-Image Generation and Retrieval with Large Multimodal ModelsabstractHow humans can effectively and efficiently acquire images has always been a perennial question. A classic solution is *text-to-image retrieval* from an existing database; however, the limited database typically lacks creativity. By contrast, recent breakthroughs in *text-to-image generation* have made it possible to produce attractive and counterfactual visual content, but it faces challenges in synthesizing knowledge-intensive images. In this work, we rethink the relationship between text-to-image generation and retrieval, proposing a *unified* framework for both tasks with one single Large Multimodal Model (LMM). Specifically, we first explore the intrinsic discriminative abilities of LMMs and introduce an efficient generative retrieval method for text-to-image retrieval in a training-free manner. Subsequently, we unify generation and retrieval autoregressively and propose an autonomous decision mechanism to choose the best-matched one between generated and retrieved images as the response to the text prompt. To standardize the evaluation of unified text-to-image generation and retrieval, we construct TIGeR-Bench, a benchmark spanning both creative and knowledge-intensive domains. Extensive experiments on TIGeR-Bench and two retrieval benchmarks, *i.e.*, Flickr30K and MS-COCO, demonstrate the superiority of our proposed framework. Leigang Qu, Haochuan Li, Wenjie Wang 0007, Yongqi Li 0001, Liqiang Nie, Tat-Seng Chua |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Convex and Non-convex Optimization Under Generalized SmoothnessabstractClassical analysis of convex and non-convex optimization methods often requires the Lipschitz continuity of the gradient, which limits the analysis to functions bounded by quadratics. Recent work relaxed this requirement to a non-uniform smoothness condition with the Hessian norm bounded by an affine function of the gradient norm, and proved convergence in the non-convex setting via gradient clipping, assuming bounded noise. In this paper, we further generalize this non-uniform smoothness condition and develop a simple, yet powerful analysis technique that bounds the gradients along the trajectory, thereby leading to stronger results for both convex and non-convex optimization problems. In particular, we obtain the classical convergence rates for (stochastic) gradient descent and Nesterov's accelerated gradient method in the convex and/or non-convex setting under this general smoothness condition. The new analysis approach does not require gradient clipping and allows heavy-tailed noise with bounded variance in the stochastic setting. Haochuan Li, Jian Qian, Alexander Rakhlin, Ali Jadbabaie |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Convergence of Adam Under Relaxed AssumptionsabstractIn this paper, we provide a rigorous proof of convergence of the Adaptive Moment Estimate (Adam) algorithm for a wide class of optimization objectives. Despite the popularity and efficiency of the Adam algorithm in training deep neural networks, its theoretical properties are not yet fully understood, and existing convergence proofs require unrealistically strong assumptions, such as globally bounded gradients, to show the convergence to stationary points. In this paper, we show that Adam provably converges to $\epsilon$-stationary points with $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-4})$ gradient complexity under far more realistic conditions. The key to our analysis is a new proof of boundedness of gradients along the optimization trajectory of Adam, under a generalized smoothness assumption according to which the local smoothness (i.e., Hessian norm when it exists) is bounded by a sub-quadratic function of the gradient norm. Moreover, we propose a variance-reduced version of Adam with an accelerated gradient complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-3})$. Haochuan Li, Alexander Rakhlin, Ali Jadbabaie |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | On Convergence of Gradient Descent Ascent: A Tight Local AnalysisabstractGradient Descent Ascent (GDA) methods are the mainstream algorithms for minimax optimization in generative adversarial networks (GANs). Convergence properties of GDA have drawn significant interest in the recent literature. Specifically, for $\min_{x} \max_{y} f(x;y)$ where $f$ is strongly-concave in $y$ and possibly nonconvex in $x$, (Lin et al., 2020) proved the convergence of GDA with a stepsize ratio $\eta_y/\eta_x=\Theta(\kappa^2)$ where $\eta_x$ and $\eta_y$ are the stepsizes for $x$ and $y$ and $\kappa$ is the condition number for $y$. While this stepsize ratio suggests a slow training of the min player, practical GAN algorithms typically adopt similar stepsizes for both variables, indicating a wide gap between theoretical and empirical results. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by analyzing the local convergence of general nonconvex-nonconcave minimax problems. We demonstrate that a stepsize ratio of $\Theta(\kappa)$ is necessary and sufficient for local convergence of GDA to a Stackelberg Equilibrium, where $\kappa$ is the local condition number for $y$. We prove a nearly tight convergence rate with a matching lower bound. We further extend the convergence guarantees to stochastic GDA and extra-gradient methods (EG). Finally, we conduct several numerical experiments to support our theoretical findings. Haochuan Li, Farzan Farnia, Subhro Das, Ali Jadbabaie |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Neural Network Weights Do Not Converge to Stationary Points: An Invariant Measure PerspectiveabstractThis work examines the deep disconnect between existing theoretical analyses of gradient-based algorithms and the practice of training deep neural networks. Specifically, we provide numerical evidence that in large-scale neural network training (e.g., ImageNet + ResNet101, and WT103 + TransformerXL models), the neural network’s weights do not converge to stationary points where the gradient of the loss is zero. Remarkably, however, we observe that even though the weights do not converge to stationary points, the progress in minimizing the loss function halts and training loss stabilizes. Inspired by this observation, we propose a new perspective based on ergodic theory of dynamical systems to explain it. Rather than studying the evolution of weights, we study the evolution of the distribution of weights. We prove convergence of the distribution of weights to an approximate invariant measure, thereby explaining how the training loss can stabilize without weights necessarily converging to stationary points. We further discuss how this perspective can better align optimization theory with empirical observations in machine learning practice. Jingzhao Zhang, Haochuan Li, Suvrit Sra, Ali Jadbabaie |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Tight Analysis of Extra-gradient and Optimistic Gradient Methods For Nonconvex Minimax ProblemsabstractDespite the established convergence theory of Optimistic Gradient Descent Ascent (OGDA) and Extragradient (EG) methods for the convex-concave minimax problems, little is known about the theoretical guarantees of these methods in nonconvex settings. To bridge this gap, for the first time, this paper establishes the convergence of OGDA and EG methods under the nonconvex-strongly-concave (NC-SC) and nonconvex-concave (NC-C) settings by providing a unified analysis through the lens of single-call extra-gradient methods. We further establish lower bounds on the convergence of GDA/OGDA/EG, shedding light on the tightness of our analysis. We also conduct experiments supporting our theoretical results. We believe our results will advance the theoretical understanding of OGDA and EG methods for solving complicated nonconvex minimax real-world problems, e.g., Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) or robust neural networks training. Pouria Mahdavinia, Yuyang Deng, Haochuan Li, Mehrdad Mahdavi |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Complexity Lower Bounds for Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Min-Max OptimizationabstractWe provide a first-order oracle complexity lower bound for finding stationary points of min-max optimization problems where the objective function is smooth, nonconvex in the minimization variable, and strongly concave in the maximization variable. We establish a lower bound of $\Omega\left(\sqrt{\kappa}\epsilon^{-2}\right)$ for deterministic oracles, where $\epsilon$ defines the level of approximate stationarity and $\kappa$ is the condition number. Our lower bound matches the best existing upper bound in the $\epsilon$ and $\kappa$ dependence up to logarithmic factors. For stochastic oracles, we provide a lower bound of $\Omega\left(\sqrt{\kappa}\epsilon^{-2} + \kappa^{1/3}\epsilon^{-4}\right)$. It suggests that there is a gap between the best existing upper bound $\mathcal{O}(\kappa^3 \epsilon^{-4})$ and our lower bound in the condition number dependence. Haochuan Li, Jingzhao Zhang, Ali Jadbabaie |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural NetworksabstractGradient descent finds a global minimum in training deep neural networks despite the objective function being non-convex. The current paper proves gradient descent achieves zero training loss in polynomial time for a deep over-parameterized neural network with residual connections (ResNet). Our analysis relies on the particular structure of the Gram matrix induced by the neural network architecture. This structure allows us to show the Gram matrix is stable throughout the training process and this stability implies the global optimality of the gradient descent algorithm. We further extend our analysis to deep residual convolutional neural networks and obtain a similar convergence result. Simon S. Du, Jason D. Lee, Haochuan Li, Liwei Wang 0001, Xiyu Zhai |
ICML | 3 |
| 2019 | Convergence of Adversarial Training in Overparametrized Neural NetworksabstractNeural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples, i.e. inputs that are imperceptibly perturbed from natural data and yet incorrectly classified by the network. Adversarial training \cite{madry2017towards}, a heuristic form of robust optimization that alternates between minimization and maximization steps, has proven to be among the most successful methods to train networks to be robust against a pre-defined family of perturbations. This paper provides a partial answer to the success of adversarial training, by showing that it converges to a network where the surrogate loss with respect to the the attack algorithm is within $\epsilon$ of the optimal robust loss. Then we show that the optimal robust loss is also close to zero, hence adversarial training finds a robust classifier. The analysis technique leverages recent work on the analysis of neural networks via Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK), combined with motivation from online-learning when the maximization is solved by a heuristic, and the expressiveness of the NTK kernel in the $\ell_\infty$-norm. In addition, we also prove that robust interpolation requires more model capacity, supporting the evidence that adversarial training requires wider networks. Ruiqi Gao, Tianle Cai, Haochuan Li, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Liwei Wang 0001, Jason D. Lee |
NeurIPS | 3 |