Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Victor Sanh

dblp:230/4101 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
9since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
10 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 29% Trustworthy machine learning · 15% Vision and language · 14%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 33% Visualization and visual analytics · 33% Visual content generation and editing · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.432021
EdgeBERT: Sentence-Level Energy Optimizations for Latency-Aware Multi-Task NLP Inference · MICRO 2021
Block Pruning For Faster Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021
Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
1.022022
Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization · ICLR 2022
A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks · AAAI 2019
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.812024
What matters when building vision-language models? · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal training data
0.712023
OBELICS: An Open Web-Scale Filtered Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Documents · NeurIPS 2023
Multimedia systems and quality of experience › user interaction
human-AI interaction
0.712023
Interactive and Visual Prompt Engineering for Ad-hoc Task Adaptation with Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visual content generation and editing
prompt optimization
0.712023
Interactive and Visual Prompt Engineering for Ad-hoc Task Adaptation with Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics
visual analytics for machine learning
0.712023
Interactive and Visual Prompt Engineering for Ad-hoc Task Adaptation with Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot task generalization
0.612022
Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
dataset bias
0.512021
Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
energy-efficient inference
0.512021
EdgeBERT: Sentence-Level Energy Optimizations for Latency-Aware Multi-Task NLP Inference · MICRO 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.512021
Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning
0.512021
Block Pruning For Faster Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › DNN inference
transformer inference
0.512021
EdgeBERT: Sentence-Level Energy Optimizations for Latency-Aware Multi-Task NLP Inference · MICRO 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.412020
Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.412020
Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hierarchical representation
hierarchical representation learning
0.412019
A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.412019
A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.412019
A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
zero-shot prompting
0.212023
Interactive and Visual Prompt Engineering for Ad-hoc Task Adaptation with Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
BERT
0.112021
EdgeBERT: Sentence-Level Energy Optimizations for Latency-Aware Multi-Task NLP Inference · MICRO 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompt tuning
0.112021
Avoiding Inference Heuristics in Few-shot Prompt-based Finetuning · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.112021
Block Pruning For Faster Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.112020
Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative optimization · 1.3interactive visualization · 1.3sentence-level energy optimization · 1.0movement pruning · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9multitask prompted training · 0.6few-shot fine-tuning · 0.5shared semantic representations · 0.4hierarchical multi-task learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 What matters when building vision-language models?
abstract
The growing interest in vision-language models (VLMs) has been driven by improvements in large language models and vision transformers. Despite the abundance of literature on this subject, we observe that critical decisions regarding the design of VLMs are often not justified. We argue that these unsupported decisions impede progress in the field by making it difficult to identify which choices improve model performance. To address this issue, we conduct extensive experiments around pre-trained models, architecture choice, data, and training methods. Our consolidation of findings includes the development of Idefics2, an efficient foundational VLM of 8 billion parameters. Idefics2 achieves state-of-the-art performance within its size category across various multimodal benchmarks, and is often on par with models four times its size. We release the model (base, instructed, and chat) along with the datasets created for its training.
Hugo Laurençon, Léo Tronchon, Matthieu Cord, Victor Sanh
NeurIPS4
2023 OBELICS: An Open Web-Scale Filtered Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Documents
abstract
Large multimodal models trained on natural documents, which interleave images and text, outperform models trained on image-text pairs on various multimodal benchmarks. However, the datasets used to train these models have not been released, and the collection process has not been fully specified. We introduce the OBELICS dataset, an open web-scale filtered dataset of interleaved image-text documents comprising 141 million web pages extracted from Common Crawl, 353 million associated images, and 115 billion text tokens. We describe the dataset creation process, present comprehensive filtering rules, and provide an analysis of the dataset's content. To show the viability of OBELICS, we train on the dataset vision and language models of 9 and 80 billion parameters, IDEFICS-9B and IDEFICS, and obtain competitive performance on different multimodal benchmarks. We release our dataset, models and code.
Hugo Laurençon, Lucile Saulnier, Léo Tronchon, Stas Bekman, Amanpreet Singh, Anton Lozhkov, Thomas Wang, Siddharth Karamcheti, Alexander M. Rush, Douwe Kiela, Matthieu Cord, Victor Sanh
NeurIPS12
2023 Interactive and Visual Prompt Engineering for Ad-hoc Task Adaptation with Large Language Models
abstract
State-of-the-art neural language models can now be used to solve ad-hoc language tasks through zero-shot prompting without the need for supervised training. This approach has gained popularity in recent years, and researchers have demonstrated prompts that achieve strong accuracy on specific NLP tasks. However, finding a prompt for new tasks requires experimentation. Different prompt templates with different wording choices lead to significant accuracy differences. PromptIDE allows users to experiment with prompt variations, visualize prompt performance, and iteratively optimize prompts. We developed a workflow that allows users to first focus on model feedback using small data before moving on to a large data regime that allows empirical grounding of promising prompts using quantitative measures of the task. The tool then allows easy deployment of the newly created ad-hoc models. We demonstrate the utility of PromptIDE (demo: http://prompt.vizhub.ai) and our workflow using several real-world use cases.
Hendrik Strobelt, Albert Webson, Victor Sanh, Benjamin Hoover, Johanna Beyer, Hanspeter Pfister, Alexander M. Rush
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.3
2022 Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization
Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim 0002, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal V. Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen 0001, Harshit Pandey, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Trishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, Andrea Santilli, Thibault Févry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Teven Le Scao, Stella Biderman, Leo Gao, Thomas Wolf 0008, Alexander M. Rush
ICLR1
2021 Block Pruning For Faster Transformers
abstract
Pre-training has improved model accuracy for both classification and generation tasks at the cost of introducing much larger and slower models.Pruning methods have proven to be an effective way of reducing model size, whereas distillation methods are proven for speeding up inference.We introduce a block pruning approach targeting both small and fast models.Our approach extends structured methods by considering blocks of any size and integrates this structure into the movement pruning paradigm for fine-tuning.We find that this approach learns to prune out full components of the underlying model, such as attention heads.Experiments consider classification and generation tasks, yielding among other results a pruned model that is a 2.4x faster, 74% smaller BERT on SQuAD v1, with a 1% drop on F1, competitive both with distilled models in speed and pruned models in size.
François Lagunas, Ella Charlaix, Victor Sanh, Alexander M. Rush
EMNLP (1)3
2021 Avoiding Inference Heuristics in Few-shot Prompt-based Finetuning
abstract
This is a repository copy of Avoiding inference heuristics in few-shot prompt-based finetuning.
Prasetya Ajie Utama, Nafise Sadat Moosavi, Victor Sanh, Iryna Gurevych
EMNLP (1)3
2021 Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them
Victor Sanh, Thomas Wolf 0008, Yonatan Belinkov, Alexander M. Rush
ICLR1
2021 EdgeBERT: Sentence-Level Energy Optimizations for Latency-Aware Multi-Task NLP Inference
abstract
Transformer-based language models such as BERT provide significant accuracy improvement to a multitude of natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, their hefty computational and memory demands make them challenging to deploy to resource-constrained edge platforms with strict latency requirements.
Thierry Tambe, Coleman Hooper, Lillian Pentecost, En-Yu Yang, Marco Donato, Victor Sanh, Paul N. Whatmough, Alexander M. Rush, David Brooks 0001, Gu-Yeon Wei
MICRO7
2021 Low-Complexity Probing via Finding Subnetworks
abstract
The dominant approach in probing neural networks for linguistic properties is to train a new shallow multi-layer perceptron (MLP) on top of the model's internal representations.This approach can detect properties encoded in the model, but at the cost of adding new parameters that may learn the task directly.We instead propose a subtractive pruning-based probe, where we find an existing subnetwork that performs the linguistic task of interest.Compared to an MLP, the subnetwork probe achieves both higher accuracy on pre-trained models and lower accuracy on random models, so it is both better at finding properties of interest and worse at learning on its own.Next, by varying the complexity of each probe, we show that subnetwork probing Pareto-dominates MLP probing in that it achieves higher accuracy given any budget of probe complexity.Finally, we analyze the resulting subnetworks across various tasks to locate where each task is encoded, and we find that lower-level tasks are captured in lower layers, reproducing similar findings in past work.
Victor Sanh, Alexander M. Rush
NAACL-HLT1
2020 Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning
abstract
Magnitude pruning is a widely used strategy for reducing model size in pure supervised learning; however, it is less effective in the transfer learning regime that has become standard for state-of-the-art natural language processing applications. We propose the use of movement pruning, a simple, deterministic first-order weight pruning method that is more adaptive to pretrained model fine-tuning. We give mathematical foundations to the method and compare it to existing zeroth- and first-order pruning methods. Experiments show that when pruning large pretrained language models, movement pruning shows significant improvements in high-sparsity regimes. When combined with distillation, the approach achieves minimal accuracy loss with down to only 3% of the model parameters.
Victor Sanh, Thomas Wolf 0008, Alexander M. Rush
NeurIPS1
2019 A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks
abstract
Much effort has been devoted to evaluate whether multi-task learning can be leveraged to learn rich representations that can be used in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) down-stream applications. However, there is still a lack of understanding of the settings in which multi-task learning has a significant effect. In this work, we introduce a hierarchical model trained in a multi-task learning setup on a set of carefully selected semantic tasks. The model is trained in a hierarchical fashion to introduce an inductive bias by supervising a set of low level tasks at the bottom layers of the model and more complex tasks at the top layers of the model. This model achieves state-of-the-art results on a number of tasks, namely Named Entity Recognition, Entity Mention Detection and Relation Extraction without hand-engineered features or external NLP tools like syntactic parsers. The hierarchical training supervision induces a set of shared semantic representations at lower layers of the model. We show that as we move from the bottom to the top layers of the model, the hidden states of the layers tend to represent more complex semantic information.
Victor Sanh, Thomas Wolf 0008, Sebastian Ruder
AAAI1