Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daiyi Peng

dblp:230/4298 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 24% 3D vision · 21% Language models and text generation · 21%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
automatic evaluation
0.812024
Long-form factuality in large language models · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model › large language model reliability
factuality
0.812024
Long-form factuality in large language models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
efficient transformer
0.712023
Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.712023
Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
sparse model
0.712023
Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.712023
Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection
0.612022
DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment
cross-modal feature alignment
0.612022
DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching
feature alignment
0.612022
DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision › multimodal perception
LiDAR-camera fusion
0.612022
DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
multimodal 3d object detection
0.612022
DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.512021
Evolving Reinforcement Learning Algorithms · ICLR 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.212023
Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

search augmentation · 0.8f1 score · 0.8LLM agents · 0.8neural architecture search · 0.7layer normalization · 0.7learnable alignment · 0.6inverse augmentation · 0.6cross-attention · 0.6evolutionary computation · 0.5weight sharing · 0.4symbolic programming · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Long-form factuality in large language models
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) often generate content that contains factual errors when responding to fact-seeking prompts on open-ended topics. To benchmark a model’s long-form factuality in open domains, we first use GPT-4 to generate LongFact, a prompt set comprising thousands of questions spanning 38 topics. We then propose that LLM agents can be used as automated evaluators for long-form factuality through a method which we call Search-Augmented Factuality Evaluator (SAFE). SAFE utilizes an LLM to break down a long-form response into a set of individual facts and to evaluate the accuracy of each fact using a multi-step reasoning process comprising sending search queries to Google Search and determining whether a fact is supported by the search results. Furthermore, we propose extending F1 score as an aggregated metric for long-form factuality. To do so, we balance the percentage of supported facts in a response (precision) with the percentage of provided facts relative to a hyperparameter representing a user’s preferred response length (recall). Empirically, we demonstrate that LLM agents can outperform crowdsourced human annotators—on a set of∼16k individual facts, SAFE agrees with crowdsourced human annotators 72% of the time, and on a random subset of 100 disagreement cases, SAFE wins 76% of the time. At the same time, SAFE is more than 20 times cheaper than human annotators. We also benchmark thirteen language models on LongFact across four model families (Gemini, GPT, Claude, and PaLM-2), finding that larger language models generally achieve better long-form factuality. LongFact, SAFE, and all experimental code are available at https://github.com/google-deepmind/long-form-factuality.
Jerry Wei, Chengrun Yang, Xinying Song, Yifeng Lu, Nathan Hu, Jie Huang 0009, Dustin Tran, Daiyi Peng, Ruibo Liu, Cosmo Du, Quoc V. Le
NeurIPS8
2023 Brainformers: Trading Simplicity for Efficiency
abstract
Transformers are central to recent successes in natural language processing and computer vision. Transformers have a mostly uniform backbone where layers alternate between feed-forward and self-attention in order to build a deep network. Here we investigate this design choice and find that more complex blocks that have different permutations of layer primitives can be more efficient. Using this insight, we develop a complex block, named Brainformer, that consists of a diverse sets of layers such as sparsely gated feed-forward layers, dense feed-forward layers, attention layers, and various forms of layer normalization and activation functions. Brainformer consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art dense and sparse Transformers, in terms of both quality and efficiency. A Brainformer model with 8 billion activated parameters per token demonstrates 2x faster training convergence and 5x faster step time compared to its GLaM counterpart. In downstream task evaluation, Brainformer also demonstrates a 3% higher SuperGLUE score with fine-tuning compared to GLaM with a similar number of activated parameters. Finally, Brainformer largely outperforms a Primer dense model derived with NAS with similar computation per token on fewshot evaluations.
Yanqi Zhou, Nan Du 0002, Yanping Huang, Daiyi Peng, Chang Lan, Siamak Shakeri, David R. So, Andrew M. Dai, Yifeng Lu, Quoc V. Le, Claire Cui, James Laudon, Jeffrey Dean
ICML4
2022 DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection
abstract
Lidars and cameras are critical sensors that provide complementary information for 3D detection in autonomous driving. While prevalent multi-modal methods [34], [36] simply decorate raw lidar point clouds with camera features and feed them directly to existing 3D detection models, our study shows that fusing camera features with deep lidar features instead of raw points, can lead to better performance. However, as those features are often augmented and aggregated, a key challenge in fusion is how to effectively align the transformed features from two modalities. In this paper, we propose two novel techniques: InverseAug that inverses geometric-related augmentations, e.g., rotation, to enable accurate geometric alignment between lidar points and image pixels, and LearnableAlign that leverages cross-attention to dynamically capture the correlations between image and lidar features during fusion. Based on InverseAug and LearnableAlign, we develop a family of generic multi-modal 3D detection models named DeepFusion, which is more accurate than previous methods. For example, DeepFusion improves Point-Pillars, CenterPoint, and 3D-MAN baselines on Pedestrian detection for 6.7,8.9, and 6.2 LEVEL_2 APH, respectively. Notably, our models achieve state-of-the-art performance on Waymo Open Dataset, and show strong model robustness against input corruptions and out-of-distribution data. Code will be publicly available at https://github.com/tensorflow/lingvo.
Yingwei Li 0002, Adams Wei Yu, Tianjian Meng, Benjamin Caine, Jiquan Ngiam, Daiyi Peng, Junyang Shen, Yifeng Lu, Denny Zhou, Quoc V. Le, Alan L. Yuille, Mingxing Tan
CVPR6
2021 Evolving Reinforcement Learning Algorithms
John D. Co-Reyes, Yingjie Miao, Daiyi Peng, Esteban Real, Quoc V. Le, Sergey Levine, Honglak Lee, Aleksandra Faust
ICLR3
2020 PyGlove: Symbolic Programming for Automated Machine Learning
abstract
Neural networks are sensitive to hyper-parameter and architecture choices. Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) is a promising paradigm for automating these choices. Current ML software libraries, however, are quite limited in handling the dynamic interactions among the components of AutoML. For example, efficient NAS algorithms, such as ENAS and DARTS, typically require an implementation coupling between the search space and search algorithm, the two key components in AutoML. Furthermore, implementing a complex search flow, such as searching architectures within a loop of searching hardware configurations, is difficult. To summarize, changing the search space, search algorithm, or search flow in current ML libraries usually requires a significant change in the program logic. In this paper, we introduce a new way of programming AutoML based on symbolic programming. Under this paradigm, ML programs are mutable, thus can be manipulated easily by another program. As a result, AutoML can be reformulated as an automated process of symbolic manipulation. With this formulation, we decouple the triangle of the search algorithm, the search space and the child program. This decoupling makes it easy to change the search space and search algorithm (without and with weight sharing), as well as to add search capabilities to existing code and implement complex search flows. We then introduce PyGlove, a new Python library that implements this paradigm. Through case studies on ImageNet and NAS-Bench-101, we show that with PyGlove users can easily convert a static program into a search space, quickly iterate on the search spaces and search algorithms, and craft complex search flows to achieve better results.
Daiyi Peng, Xuanyi Dong, Esteban Real, Mingxing Tan, Yifeng Lu, Gabriel Bender, Hanxiao Liu, Adam Kraft, Quoc V. Le
NeurIPS1