EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yashaswini Murthy
dblp:230/4629
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › infinite-horizon markov decision process
average-reward MDP |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Global Convergence of Policy Gradient in Average Reward MDPs · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Global Convergence of Policy Gradient in Average Reward MDPs · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming › policy iteration
approximate policy iteration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Performance Bounds for Policy-Based Average Reward Reinforcement Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
average-reward reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Performance Bounds for Policy-Based Average Reward Reinforcement Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy-based reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Performance Bounds for Policy-Based Average Reward Reinforcement Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › sequential decision making
markov decision processes |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Global Convergence of Policy Gradient in Average Reward MDPs · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
policy gradient · 1.7finite-time analysis · 1.7markov decision process · 0.7approximate policy iteration · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Global Convergence of Policy Gradient in Average Reward MDPsabstractWe present the first comprehensive finite-time global convergence analysis of policy gradient for infinite horizon average reward Markov decision processes (MDPs). Specifically, we focus on ergodic tabular MDPs with finite state and action spaces. Our analysis shows that the policy gradient iterates converge to the optimal policy at a sublinear rate of $O(\frac{1}{T})$, where $T$ represents the number of iterations. Performance bounds for discounted reward MDPs cannot be easily extended to average reward MDPs as the bounds grow proportional to the fifth power of the effective horizon. Recent work on such extensions makes a smoothness assumption that has not been verified. Thus, our primary contribution is in providing the first complete proof that the policy gradient algorithm converges globally for average-reward MDPs, without such an assumption. We also obtain the corresponding finite-time performance guarantees. In contrast to the existing discounted reward performance bounds, our performance bounds have an explicit dependence on constants that capture the complexity of the underlying MDP. Motivated by this observation, we reexamine and improve the existing performance bounds for discounted reward MDPs. We also present simulations that empirically validate the result. Navdeep Kumar, Yashaswini Murthy, Itai Shufaro, Kfir Y. Levy, R. Srikant 0001, Shie Mannor |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Performance Bounds for Policy-Based Average Reward Reinforcement Learning AlgorithmsabstractMany policy-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms can be viewed as instantiations of approximate policy iteration (PI), i.e., where policy improvement and policy evaluation are both performed approximately. In applications where the average reward objective is the meaningful performance metric, often discounted reward formulations are used with the discount factor being close to $1,$ which is equivalent to making the expected horizon very large. However, the corresponding theoretical bounds for error performance scale with the square of the horizon. Thus, even after dividing the total reward by the length of the horizon, the corresponding performance bounds for average reward problems go to infinity. Therefore, an open problem has been to obtain meaningful performance bounds for approximate PI and RL algorithms for the average-reward setting. In this paper, we solve this open problem by obtaining the first non-trivial finite time error bounds for average-reward MDPs which go to zero in the limit as policy evaluation and policy improvement errors go to zero. Yashaswini Murthy, Mehrdad Moharrami, R. Srikant 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | The Twelvefold Way of Non-Sequential Lossless CompressionabstractMany information sources are not just sequences of distinguishable symbols but rather have invariances governed by alternative counting paradigms such as permutations, combinations, and partitions. We consider an entire classification of these invariances called the twelvefold way in enumerative combinatorics and develop a method to characterize lossless compression limits. Explicit computations for all twelve settings are carried out for i.i.d. uniform and Bernoulli distributions. Comparisons among settings provide quantitative insight. Taha Ameen ur Rahman, Alton S. Barbehenn, Xinan Chen 0003, Hassan Dbouk, James A. Douglas, Yuncong Geng, Ian George, John B. Harvill, Sung Woo Jeon, Kartik K. Kansal, Kiwook Lee, Kelly A. Levick, Bochao Li, Yashaswini Murthy, Adarsh Muthuveeru-Subramaniam, S. Yagiz Olmez, Matthew J. Tomei, Tanya Veeravalli, Xuechao Wang, Eric A. Wayman, Fan Wu 0011, Heling Zhang, Sourya Basu, Lav R. Varshney |
DCC | 15 |