Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hima P. Karanam

dblp:230/8590 · also Hima Karanam · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 52% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 8%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Knowledge graphs · 28% Information retrieval · 24% Data models and query languages · 24%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering
0.712023
Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
temporal question answering
0.712023
Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction · EMNLP 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › distributed knowledge representation
knowledge base embedding
0.412020
Inductive Quantum Embedding · NeurIPS 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning
0.412019
Quantum Embedding of Knowledge for Reasoning · NeurIPS 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum foundations
quantum logic
0.412019
Quantum Embedding of Knowledge for Reasoning · NeurIPS 2019
Data models and query languages › natural language interface
natural language interface to database
0.312018
Tooling Framework for Instantiating Natural Language Querying System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018
Information retrieval › query formulation
natural language querying
0.312018
Tooling Framework for Instantiating Natural Language Querying System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction
0.312017
Creation and Interaction with Large-scale Domain-Specific Knowledge Bases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
fact extraction
0.212023
Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › entity typing
fine-grained entity typing
0.112020
Inductive Quantum Embedding · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
natural language query
0.112017
Creation and Interaction with Large-scale Domain-Specific Knowledge Bases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical relational learning · 0.8quantum logic · 0.8open-domain question answering · 0.7language model · 0.7inductive learning · 0.4geometric analysis · 0.4tooling framework · 0.3ontology mapping · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Best of Both Worlds: Towards Improving Temporal Knowledge Base Question Answering via Targeted Fact Extraction
abstract
Temporal question answering (QA) is a special category of complex question answering task that requires reasoning over facts asserting time intervals of events.Previous works have predominately relied on Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) for temporal QA.One of the major challenges faced by these systems is their inability to retrieve all relevant facts due to factors such as incomplete KB and entity/relation linking errors (Patidar et al., 2022).A failure to fetch even a single fact will block KBQA from computing the answer.Such cases of KB incompleteness are even more profound in the temporal context.To address this issue, we explore an interesting direction where a targeted temporal fact extraction technique is used to assist KBQA whenever it fails to retrieve temporal facts from the KB.We model the extraction problem as an open-domain question answering task using offthe-shelf language models.This way, we target to extract from textual resources those facts that failed to get retrieved from the KB.Experimental results on two temporal QA benchmarks show promising ~30% & ~10% relative improvements in answer accuracies without any additional training cost.
Nithish Kannen, Udit Sharma, Sumit Neelam, Dinesh Khandelwal, Shajith Ikbal, Hima P. Karanam, L. Venkata Subramaniam
EMNLP6
2020 Inductive Quantum Embedding
abstract
Quantum logic inspired embedding (aka Quantum Embedding (QE)) of a Knowledge-Base (KB) was proposed recently by Garg:2019. It is claimed that the QE preserves the logical structure of the input KB given in the form of unary and binary predicates hierarchy. Such structure preservation allows one to perform Boolean logic style deductive reasoning directly over these embedding vectors. The original QE idea, however, is limited to the transductive (not inductive) setting. Moreover, the original QE scheme runs quite slow on real applications involving millions of entities. This paper alleviates both of these key limitations. We start by reformulating the original QE problem to allow for the induction. On the way, we also underscore some interesting analytic and geometric properties of the solution and leverage them to design a faster training scheme. As an application, we show that one can achieve state-of-the-art performance on the well-known NLP task of fine-grained entity type classification by using the inductive QE approach. Our training runs 9-times faster than the original QE scheme on this task.
Santosh K. Srivastava, Dinesh Khandelwal, Dhiraj Madan, Dinesh Garg, Hima P. Karanam, L. Venkata Subramaniam
NeurIPS5
2019 Quantum Embedding of Knowledge for Reasoning
abstract
Statistical Relational Learning (SRL) methods are the most widely used techniques to generate distributional representations of the symbolic Knowledge Bases (KBs). These methods embed any given KB into a vector space by exploiting statistical similarities among its entities and predicates but without any guarantee of preserving the underlying logical structure of the KB. This, in turn, results in poor performance of logical reasoning tasks that are solved using such distributional representations. We present a novel approach called Embed2Reason (E2R) that embeds a symbolic KB into a vector space in a logical structure preserving manner. This approach is inspired by the theory of Quantum Logic. Such an embedding allows answering membership based complex logical reasoning queries with impressive accuracy improvements over popular SRL baselines.
Dinesh Garg, Shajith Ikbal, Santosh K. Srivastava, Harit Vishwakarma, Hima P. Karanam, L. Venkata Subramaniam
NeurIPS5
2018 Tooling Framework for Instantiating Natural Language Querying System
abstract
Recent times have seen a growing demand for natural language querying (NLQ) interfaces to retrieve information from the structured data sources such as knowledge bases. Using this interface, business users can directly interact with a database without the knowledge of the query language or the data schema. Our earlier work describes a natural language query engine called ATHENA which has several shortcoming around ease of use and compatibility with data stores, formats and flows. In this demonstration paper, we present a tooling framework to address these challenges so that one can instantiate an NLQ system with utmost ease. Our framework makes it easy and practically applicable to all NLIDB scenarios involving different sources of structured data, file formats, and ontologies to enable natural language querying on top of them with minimal human configuration. We present the tool design and the solution to the challenges towards building such a system and demonstrate its applicability in the medical domain.
Manasa Jammi, Jaydeep Sen, Ashish R. Mittal, Sagar Verma, Vardaan Pahuja, Rema Ananthanarayanan, Pranay Lohia, Hima P. Karanam, Diptikalyan Saha, Karthik Sankaranarayanan
Proc. VLDB Endow.8
2017 Creation and Interaction with Large-scale Domain-Specific Knowledge Bases
abstract
The ability to create and interact with large-scale domain-specific knowledge bases from unstructured/semi-structured data is the foundation for many industry-focused cognitive systems. We will demonstrate the Content Services system that provides cloud services for creating and querying high-quality domain-specific knowledge bases by analyzing and integrating multiple (un/semi)structured content sources. We will showcase an instantiation of the system for a financial domain. We will also demonstrate both cross-lingual natural language queries and programmatic API calls for interacting with this knowledge base.
Shreyas Bharadwaj, Laura Chiticariu, Marina Danilevsky, Samarth Dhingra, Samved Divekar, Arnaldo Carreno-Fuentes, Nitin Gupta 0005, Sang-Don Han, Mauricio A. Hernández, C. T. Howard Ho, Parag Jain, Salil Joshi 0001, Hima P. Karanam, Saravanan Krishnan, Rajasekar Krishnamurthy, Yunyao Li 0001, Satishkumaar Manivannan, Ashish R. Mittal, Fatma Özcan 0001, Abdul Quamar, Poornima Chozhiyath Raman, Diptikalyan Saha, Karthik Sankaranarayanan, Jaydeep Sen, Prithviraj Sen, Shivakumar Vaithyanathan, Mitesh Vasa, Huaiyu Zhu 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.14
2012 Fusing biographical and biometric classifiers for improved person identification
Vivek Tyagi, Hima P. Karanam, Tanveer A. Faruquie, L. Venkata Subramaniam, Nalini K. Ratha
ICPR2