Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Artem Betlei

dblp:231/1003 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-2628-9617ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 66% Information retrieval · 34%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 87% Learning theory · 13%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory
bidding strategy
0.812024
Maximizing the Success Probability of Policy Allocations in Online Systems · AAAI 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
online advertising
0.812024
Maximizing the Success Probability of Policy Allocations in Online Systems · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.512021
Uplift Modeling with Generalization Guarantees · KDD 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › heterogeneous treatment effect estimation
uplift modeling
0.512021
Uplift Modeling with Generalization Guarantees · KDD 2021
Information retrieval › online advertising
display advertising
0.312026
Abacus: Self-Supervised Event Counting-Aligned Distributional Pretraining for Sequential User Modeling · WSDM 2026
Information retrieval › online advertising
real-time bidding
0.312026
Abacus: Self-Supervised Event Counting-Aligned Distributional Pretraining for Sequential User Modeling · WSDM 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.112021
Uplift Modeling with Generalization Guarantees · KDD 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential modeling · 1.0self-supervised learning · 1.0hybrid objective · 1.0multiple treatment allocation · 0.8knapsack optimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Abacus: Self-Supervised Event Counting-Aligned Distributional Pretraining for Sequential User Modeling
abstract
Modeling user purchase behavior is a critical challenge in display advertising systems, necessary for real-time bidding. The difficulty arises from the sparsity of positive user events and the stochasticity of user actions, leading to severe class imbalance and irregular event timing. Predictive systems usually rely on hand-crafted "counter" features, overlooking the fine-grained temporal evolution of user intent. Meanwhile, current sequential models extract direct sequential signal, missing useful event-counting statistics. We enhance deep sequential models with self-supervised pretraining strategies for display advertising. Especially, we introduce Abacus, a novel approach of predicting the empirical frequency distribution of user events. We further propose a hybrid objective unifying Abacus with sequential learning objectives, combining stability of aggregated statistics with the sequence modeling sensitivity. Experiments on two real-world datasets show that Abacus pretraining outperforms existing methods accelerating downstream task convergence, while hybrid approach yields up to +6.1% AUC compared to the baselines.
Sullivan Castro, Artem Betlei, Thomas Di Martino, Nadir El Manouzi
WSDM2
2024 Maximizing the Success Probability of Policy Allocations in Online Systems
abstract
The effectiveness of advertising in e-commerce largely depends on the ability of merchants to bid on and win impressions for their targeted users. The bidding procedure is highly complex due to various factors such as market competition, user behavior, and the diverse objectives of advertisers. In this paper we consider the problem at the level of user timelines instead of individual bid requests, manipulating full policies (i.e. pre-defined bidding strategies) and not bid values. In order to optimally allocate policies to users, typical multiple treatments allocation methods solve knapsack-like problems which aim at maximizing an expected value under constraints. In the specific context of online advertising, we argue that optimizing for the probability of success is a more suited objective than expected value maximization, and we introduce the SuccessProbaMax algorithm that aims at finding the policy allocation which is the most likely to outperform a fixed reference policy. Finally, we conduct comprehensive experiments both on synthetic and real-world data to evaluate its performance. The results demonstrate that our proposed algorithm outperforms conventional expected-value maximization algorithms in terms of success rate.
Artem Betlei, Mariia Vladimirova, Mehdi Sebbar, Nicolas Urien, Thibaud Rahier, Benjamin Heymann
AAAI1
2021 Uplift Modeling with Generalization Guarantees
abstract
In this paper, we consider the task of ranking individuals based on the potential benefit of being "treated" (e.g. by a drug or exposure to recommendations or ads), referred to as Uplift Modeling in the literature. This application has gained a surge of interest in recent years and it is found in many applications such as personalized medicine, recommender systems or targeted advertising. In real life scenarios the capacity of models to rank individuals by potential benefit is measured by the Area Under the Uplift Curve (AUUC), a ranking metric related to the well known Area Under ROC Curve. In the case where the objective function, for learning model parameters, is different from AUUC, the capacity of the resulting system to generalize on AUUC is limited. To tackle this issue, we propose to learn a model that directly optimizes an upper bound on AUUC. To find such a model we first develop a generalization bound on AUUC and then derive from it a learning objective called AUUC-max, usable with linear and deep models. We empirically study the tightness of this generalization bound, its effectiveness for hyperparameters tuning and show the efficiency of the proposed learning objective compared to a wide range of competitive baselines on two classical uplift modeling benchmarks using real-world datasets.
Artem Betlei, Eustache Diemert, Massih-Reza Amini
KDD1
2018 Uplift Prediction with Dependent Feature Representation in Imbalanced Treatment and Control Conditions
Artem Betlei, Eustache Diemert, Massih-Reza Amini
ICONIP (5)1