Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Francesco Formaggio
dblp:231/2650
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-3456-1557ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Wireless sensing and localization · 50% Physical-layer communications · 30% Internet of things and sensor networks · 20% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless sensing and localization › secure localization
location verification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine Learning for In-Region Location Verification in Wireless Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2019 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › motion sensing › inertial sensing
inertial measurement unit |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test for GNSS Spoofing Detection in Devices With IMU · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021 |
Physical-layer communications
channel modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Machine Learning for In-Region Location Verification in Wireless Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2019 |
Physical-layer communications › channel modeling
path loss modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Machine Learning for In-Region Location Verification in Wireless Networks · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum likelihood estimation · 1.0kalman filter · 1.0generalized likelihood ratio test · 1.0support vector machine · 0.4one-class classification · 0.4neyman-pearson test · 0.4neural network · 0.4autoencoder · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Robust Localization for Secure Navigation of UAV Formations Under GNSS Spoofing AttackabstractNowadays, aerial formations are frequently employed in outdoor scenarios to cooperatively explore and monitor wide areas of interest. In these applications, the vehicles are often exposed to relevant security vulnerabilities, as, for instance, the alteration of navigation signals from an attacker with map counterfeiting (if not even hijacking) purposes. In this work, we focus on an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) formation that monitors an area, wherein navigation spoofing attacks may occur. Letting the UAVs cooperate and exploiting the redundancy in the available sensing information, a distributed procedure is proposed to$i$) detect spoofing attacks, and$ii$) support the navigation in adverse conditions. The validity of the designed approach is confirmed by numerical results. Aerial vehicles for outdoor operation are generally endowed with inertial measurements, relative ranging, and GNSS sensing capability. In this work, two cascaded estimation algorithms for concurrent GNSS spoofing detection and localization in a multi-UAV scenario is proposed, to attain robust navigation in areas subject to GNSS spoofing attacks. The attack detection leverages on information theoretic tools to provide a practical threshold test by checking the multimodal measurement consistency. The localization procedures exploit a decision logic relying on measurement reliability to combine information sources that are different in nature, for UAV self-localization in both safe and under-attack conditions. Note to Practitioners—Aerial vehicles for outdoor operation are generally endowed with inertial measurements, relative ranging, and GNSS sensing capability. In this work, two cascaded estimation algorithms for concurrent GNSS spoofing detection and localization in a multi-UAV scenario is proposed, to attain robust navigation in areas subject to GNSS spoofing attacks. The attack detection leverages on information theoretic tools to provide a practical threshold test by checking the multimodal measurement consistency. The localization procedures exploit a decision logic relying on measurement reliability to combine information sources that are different in nature, for UAV self-localization in both safe and under-attack conditions. Giulia Michieletto, Francesco Formaggio, Angelo Cenedese, Stefano Tomasin |
IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng. | 2 |
| 2021 | Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test for GNSS Spoofing Detection in Devices With IMUabstractSpoofing attacks in global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) aim at inducing the estimation of a fake position at the victim receiver. Many devices, including smartphones, are nowadays equipped with both a GNSS receiver and an inertial measurement unit (IMU), which also provides location/movement information, while being immune from GNSS attacks. We propose a spoofing detection technique based on the comparison between GNSS and IMU measurements. The detection is performed through a generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT), which is efficiently implemented by a matrix multiplication approach. In particular, the device a) estimates its orientation from magnetometer and gyroscope measurements, b) estimates its position, acceleration, and velocity by a maximum likelihood approach, and c) performs the GLRT for spoofing detection. The performance of the proposed GLRT is compared with the Kalman filter innovation test and with the direct comparison method (DCM), both in terms of false alarm/missed detection probabilities and computational complexity. Marco Ceccato, Francesco Formaggio, Nicola Laurenti, Stefano Tomasin |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 2 |
| 2020 | On receiver diversity for grant-free based machine type communications
Francesco Formaggio, Andrea Munari, Federico Clazzer |
Ad Hoc Networks | 1 |
| 2019 | Location-Verification and Network Planning via Machine Learning ApproachesabstractIn-region location verification (IRLV) in wireless networks is the problem of deciding if user equipment (UE) is transmitting from inside or outside a specific physical region (e.g., a safe room). The decision process exploits the features of the channel between the UE and a set of network access points (APs). We propose a solution based on machine learning (ML) implemented by a neural network (NN) trained with the channel features (in particular, noisy attenuation values) collected by the APs for various positions both inside and outside the specific region. The output is a decision on the UE position (inside or outside the region). By seeing IRLV as an hypothesis testing problem, we address the optimal positioning of the APs for minimizing either the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) or the cross entropy (CE) between the NN output and ground truth (available during the training). In order to solve the minimization problem we propose a two-stage particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. We show that for a long training and a NN with enough neurons the proposed solution achieves the performance of the Neyman-Pearson (N-P) lemma. Alessandro Brighente, Francesco Formaggio, Marco Centenaro, Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio, Stefano Tomasin |
WiOpt | 2 |
| 2019 | Machine Learning for In-Region Location Verification in Wireless NetworksabstractIn-region location verification (IRLV) aims at verifying whether a user is inside a region of interest (ROI). In wireless networks, IRLV can exploit the features of the channel between the user and a set of trusted access points. In practice, the channel feature statistics is not available and we resort to machine learning (ML) solutions for IRLV. We first show that solutions based on either neural networks (NNs) or support vector machines (SVMs) with typical loss functions are Neyman-Pearson (N-P)-optimal at learning convergence for sufficiently complex learning machines and large training datasets. For a finite training, ML solutions are more accurate than the N-P test based on estimated channel statistics. Then, as estimating channel features outside the ROI may be difficult, we consider one-class classifiers, namely auto-encoder NNs and one-class SVMs which, however, are not equivalent to the generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT), typically replacing the N-P test in the one-class problem. Numerical examples support the results in realistic wireless networks, with channel models including path-loss, shadowing, and fading. Alessandro Brighente, Francesco Formaggio, Giorgio Maria Di Nunzio, Stefano Tomasin |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 2 |