EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Klaus Winter
dblp:231/7080
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-7940-1653ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
design patterns |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Challenges and Common Solutions in Smart Contract Development · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › smart contract security
smart contract vulnerability |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Challenges and Common Solutions in Smart Contract Development · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Electronic design automation › physical design › routing › VLSI routing
gate array routing |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Hierarchical Loose Routing for Gate Arrays · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1987 |
Electronic design automation
physical design |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Hierarchical Loose Routing for Gate Arrays · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1987 |
Electronic design automation › physical design
routing |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Hierarchical Loose Routing for Gate Arrays · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
literature review · 1.1expert interview · 1.1minimum spanning tree · 0.0hierarchical decomposition · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Challenges and Common Solutions in Smart Contract DevelopmentabstractSmart contracts are a promising means of formalizing and reliably enforcing agreements between entities using distributed ledger technology (DLT). Research has revealed that a significant number of smart contracts are subject to programming flaws, making them vulnerable to attacks and leading to detrimental effects, such as asset loss. Researchers and developers call for a thorough analysis of challenges to identify their causes and propose solutions. To respond to these calls, we conducted two literature reviews and diverse expert interviews and synthesized scattered knowledge on challenges and solutions. We identified 29 challenges (e.g., code visibility, code updateability, and encapsulation) and 60 solutions (e.g., gas limit specification, off-ledger computations, and shadowing). Moreover, we developed 20 software design patterns (SDPs) in collaboration with smart contract developers. The SDPs help developers adjust their programming habits and thus support them in their daily development practices. Our results provide actionable knowledge for smart contract developers to overcome the identified challenges and offer support for comparing smart contract integration concepts across three fundamentally different DLT protocols (i.e., Ethereum, EOSIO, and Hyperledger Fabric). Moreover, we support developers in becoming aware of peculiarities in smart contract development and the resulting benefits and drawbacks. Niclas Kannengießer, Sebastian Lins, Christian Sander, Klaus Winter, Hellmuth Frey, Ali Sunyaev |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 4 |
| 1987 | Hierarchical Loose Routing for Gate ArraysabstractIn this paper, we present a new, quasi-parallel approach to the loose routing problem for gate array LSI design. It is based on a new modeling for the decomposition problem of each net using a compact net graph which maps sets of feed-throughs instead of individual ones. The loose routing is done by calculation of a minimum spanning tree in this net graph and by a proper embedding of the tree as a set of single-channel subnets and feed-throughs. Moreover, a hierarchical approach is proposed, leading to a quasi-parallel embedding of all nets. It also allows different routing priorities for single connections within multiterminal nets. The hierarchical loose routing concept presented here is implemented in the fully integrated gate array design system MEGA and has been successfully tested on several industrial design examples. Klaus Winter, Dieter A. Mlynski |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |