Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ellango Jothimurugesan
dblp:231/7664
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data stream processing · 67% Machine learning and data management · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning and data management
adaptive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DriftSurf: Stable-State / Reactive-State Learning under Concept Drift · ICML 2021 |
Data stream processing › evolving data
concept drift |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DriftSurf: Stable-State / Reactive-State Learning under Concept Drift · ICML 2021 |
Data stream processing › evolving data › concept drift
drift detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DriftSurf: Stable-State / Reactive-State Learning under Concept Drift · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Variance-Reduced Stochastic Gradient Descent on Streaming Data · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › online optimization
streaming optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Variance-Reduced Stochastic Gradient Descent on Streaming Data · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised learning · 0.5stable-state/reactive-state process · 0.5variance reduction · 0.3competitive analysis · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Federated Learning under Distributed Concept DriftabstractFederated Learning (FL) under distributed concept drift is a largely unexplored area. Although concept drift is itself a well-studied phenomenon, it poses particular challenges for FL, because drifts arise staggered in time and space (across clients). Our work is the first to explicitly study data heterogeneity in both dimensions. We first demonstrate that prior solutions to drift adaptation, with their single global model, are ill-suited to staggered drifts, necessitating multiple-model solutions. We identify the problem of drift adaptation as a time-varying clustering problem, and we propose two new clustering algorithms for reacting to drifts based on local drift detection and hierarchical clustering. Empirical evaluation shows that our solutions achieve significantly higher accuracy than existing baselines, and are comparable to an idealized algorithm with oracle knowledge of the ground-truth clustering of clients to concepts at each time step. Ellango Jothimurugesan, Kevin Hsieh, Gauri Joshi, Phillip B. Gibbons |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2021 | DriftSurf: Stable-State / Reactive-State Learning under Concept DriftabstractWhen learning from streaming data, a change in the data distribution, also known as concept drift, can render a previously-learned model inaccurate and require training a new model. We present an adaptive learning algorithm that extends previous drift-detection-based methods by incorporating drift detection into a broader stable-state/reactive-state process. The advantage of our approach is that we can use aggressive drift detection in the stable state to achieve a high detection rate, but mitigate the false positive rate of standalone drift detection via a reactive state that reacts quickly to true drifts while eliminating most false positives. The algorithm is generic in its base learner and can be applied across a variety of supervised learning problems. Our theoretical analysis shows that the risk of the algorithm is (i) statistically better than standalone drift detection and (ii) competitive to an algorithm with oracle knowledge of when (abrupt) drifts occur. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets with concept drifts confirm our theoretical analysis. Ashraf Tahmasbi, Ellango Jothimurugesan, Srikanta Tirthapura, Phillip B. Gibbons |
ICML | 2 |
| 2018 | Variance-Reduced Stochastic Gradient Descent on Streaming DataabstractWe present an algorithm STRSAGA for efficiently maintaining a machine learning model over data points that arrive over time, quickly updating the model as new training data is observed. We present a competitive analysis comparing the sub-optimality of the model maintained by STRSAGA with that of an offline algorithm that is given the entire data beforehand, and analyze the risk-competitiveness of STRSAGA under different arrival patterns. Our theoretical and experimental results show that the risk of STRSAGA is comparable to that of offline algorithms on a variety of input arrival patterns, and its experimental performance is significantly better than prior algorithms suited for streaming data, such as SGD and SSVRG. Ellango Jothimurugesan, Ashraf Tahmasbi, Phillip B. Gibbons, Srikanta Tirthapura |
NeurIPS | 1 |