Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anish Prasad Sevekari
dblp:231/7677
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 36% Learning theory · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
computational-statistical gap |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Provable benefits of score matching · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pitfalls of Gaussians as a noise distribution in NCE · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
ensemble distillation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Progressive Ensemble Distillation: Building Ensembles for Efficient Inference · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Progressive Ensemble Distillation: Building Ensembles for Efficient Inference · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Progressive Ensemble Distillation: Building Ensembles for Efficient Inference · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Progressive Ensemble Distillation: Building Ensembles for Efficient Inference · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
noise contrastive estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pitfalls of Gaussians as a noise distribution in NCE · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Provable benefits of score matching · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pitfalls of Gaussians as a noise distribution in NCE · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Universal Approximation Using Well-Conditioned Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory › neural network approximation
universal approximation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Universal Approximation Using Well-Conditioned Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2021 |
Algorithms and data structures › matrix approximation
subspace approximation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Robust Subspace Approximation in a Stream · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Universal Approximation Using Well-Conditioned Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Universal Approximation Using Well-Conditioned Normalizing Flows · NeurIPS 2021 |
Distributed systems
distributed algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Robust Subspace Approximation in a Stream · NeurIPS 2018 |
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Robust Subspace Approximation in a Stream · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zeroth-order oracle · 0.7oblivious dimensionality reduction · 0.7knowledge distillation · 0.7gradient-based optimization · 0.7gaussian noise distribution · 0.7boosting · 0.7approximation algorithm · 0.7underdamped langevin dynamics · 0.5hénon maps · 0.5gaussian padding · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Pitfalls of Gaussians as a noise distribution in NCE
Holden Lee, Chirag Pabbaraju, Anish Prasad Sevekari, Andrej Risteski |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Progressive Ensemble Distillation: Building Ensembles for Efficient InferenceabstractKnowledge distillation is commonly used to compress an ensemble of models into a single model. In this work we study the problem of progressive ensemble distillation: Given a large, pretrained teacher model , we seek to decompose the model into an ensemble of smaller, low-inference cost student models . The resulting ensemble allows for flexibly tuning accuracy vs. inference cost, which can be useful for a multitude of applications in efficient inference. Our method, B-DISTIL, uses a boosting procedure that allows function composition based aggregation rules to construct expressive ensembles with similar performance as using much smaller student models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of B-DISTIL by decomposing pretrained models across a variety of image, speech, and sensor datasets. Our method comes with strong theoretical guarantees in terms of convergence as well as generalization. Don Kurian Dennis, Abhishek Shetty, Anish Prasad Sevekari, Kazuhito Koishida, Virginia Smith |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Provable benefits of score matchingabstractScore matching is an alternative to maximum likelihood (ML) for estimating a probability distribution parametrized up to a constant of proportionality. By fitting the ''score'' of the distribution, it sidesteps the need to compute this constant of proportionality (which is often intractable).
While score matching and variants thereof are popular in practice, precise theoretical understanding of the benefits and tradeoffs with maximum likelihood---both computational and statistical---are not well understood. In this work, we give the first example of a natural exponential family of distributions such that the score matching loss is computationally efficient to optimize, and has a comparable statistical efficiency to ML, while the ML loss is intractable to optimize using a gradient-based method. The family consists of exponentials of polynomials of fixed degree, and our result can be viewed as a continuous analogue of recent developments in the discrete setting. Precisely, we show: (1) Designing a zeroth-order or first-order oracle for optimizing the maximum likelihood loss is NP-hard. (2) Maximum likelihood has a statistical efficiency polynomial in the ambient dimension and the radius of the parameters of the family. (3)
Minimizing the score matching loss is both computationally and statistically efficient, with complexity polynomial in the ambient dimension. Chirag Pabbaraju, Dhruv Rohatgi, Anish Prasad Sevekari, Holden Lee, Ankur Moitra, Andrej Risteski |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Universal Approximation Using Well-Conditioned Normalizing FlowsabstractNormalizing flows are a widely used class of latent-variable generative models with a tractable likelihood. Affine-coupling models [Dinh et al., 2014, 2016] are a particularly common type of normalizing flows, for which the Jacobian of the latent-to-observable-variable transformation is triangular, allowing the likelihood to be computed in linear time. Despite the widespread usage of affine couplings, the special structure of the architecture makes understanding their representational power challenging. The question of universal approximation was only recently resolved by three parallel papers [Huang et al., 2020, Zhang et al., 2020, Koehler et al., 2020] – who showed reasonably regular distributions can be approximated arbitrarily well using affine couplings – albeit with networks with a nearly-singular Jacobian. As ill-conditioned Jacobians are an obstacle for likelihood-based training, the fundamental question remains: which distributions can be approximated using well-conditioned affine coupling flows? In this paper, we show that any log-concave distribution can be approximated using well-conditioned affine-coupling flows. In terms of proof techniques, we uncover and leverage deep connections between affine coupling architectures, underdamped Langevin dynamics (a stochastic differential equation often used to sample from Gibbs measures) and Hénon maps (a structured dynamical system that appears in the study of symplectic diffeomorphisms). In terms of informing practice, we approximate a padded version of the input distribution with iid Gaussians – a strategy which Koehler et al. [2020] empirically observed to result in better-conditioned flows, but had hitherto no theoretical grounding. Our proof can thus be seen as providing theoretical evidence for the benefits of Gaussian padding when training normalizing flows. Holden Lee, Chirag Pabbaraju, Anish Prasad Sevekari, Andrej Risteski |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2018 | Robust Subspace Approximation in a StreamabstractWe study robust subspace estimation in the streaming and distributed settings. Given a set of n data points {ai}{i=1}^n in R^d and an integer k, we wish to find a linear subspace S of dimension k for which sumi M(dist(S, ai)) is minimized, where dist(S,x) := min_{y in S} |x-y|_2, and M() is some loss function. When M is the identity function, S gives a subspace that is more robust to outliers than that provided by the truncated SVD. Though the problem is NP-hard, it is approximable within a (1+epsilon) factor in polynomial time when k and epsilon are constant. We give the first sublinear approximation algorithm for this problem in the turnstile streaming and arbitrary partition distributed models, achieving the same time guarantees as in the offline case. Our algorithm is the first based entirely on oblivious dimensionality reduction, and significantly simplifies prior methods for this problem, which held in neither the streaming nor distributed models. Roie Levin, Anish Prasad Sevekari, David P. Woodruff |
NeurIPS | 2 |