Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Akansha Dey
dblp:231/7710
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 50% Efficient and distributed learning · 25% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning from discriminative feature feedback · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning from discriminative feature feedback · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
mistake bounds |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning from discriminative feature feedback · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning from discriminative feature feedback · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
discriminative feature feedback · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Learning from discriminative feature feedbackabstractWe consider the problem of learning a multi-class classifier from labels as well as simple explanations that we call "discriminative features". We show that such explanations can be provided whenever the target concept is a decision tree, or more generally belongs to a particular subclass of DNF formulas. We present an efficient online algorithm for learning from such feedback and we give tight bounds on the number of mistakes made during the learning process. These bounds depend only on the size of the target concept and not on the overall number of available features, which could be infinite. We also demonstrate the learning procedure experimentally. Sanjoy Dasgupta, Akansha Dey, Nicholas Roberts, Sivan Sabato |
NeurIPS | 2 |