Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Johannes Lehner

dblp:232/0972 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 54% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 11%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
1.322024
Contrastive Tuning: A Little Help to Make Masked Autoencoders Forget · AAAI 2024
CLOOB: Modern Hopfield Networks with InfoLOOB Outperform CLIP · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation
0.812024
Overcoming Saturation in Density Ratio Estimation by Iterated Regularization · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory › regularization theory
iterative regularization
0.812024
Overcoming Saturation in Density Ratio Estimation by Iterated Regularization · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
masked image modeling
0.812024
Contrastive Tuning: A Little Help to Make Masked Autoencoders Forget · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation
0.812024
Overcoming Saturation in Density Ratio Estimation by Iterated Regularization · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › associative memory
modern hopfield model
0.612022
CLOOB: Modern Hopfield Networks with InfoLOOB Outperform CLIP · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning
0.612022
CLOOB: Modern Hopfield Networks with InfoLOOB Outperform CLIP · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
associative memory
0.512021
Hopfield Networks is All You Need · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
hopfield network
0.512021
Hopfield Networks is All You Need · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot classification
0.212024
Contrastive Tuning: A Little Help to Make Masked Autoencoders Forget · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer
0.212022
CLOOB: Modern Hopfield Networks with InfoLOOB Outperform CLIP · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nearest neighbor contrastive learning · 0.8masked autoencoder · 0.8kernel methods · 0.8modern hopfield networks · 0.6InfoNCE · 0.6InfoLOOB · 0.6energy-based model · 0.5attention mechanism · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Contrastive Tuning: A Little Help to Make Masked Autoencoders Forget
abstract
Masked Image Modeling (MIM) methods, like Masked Autoencoders (MAE), efficiently learn a rich representation of the input. However, for adapting to downstream tasks, they require a sufficient amount of labeled data since their rich features code not only objects but also less relevant image background. In contrast, Instance Discrimination (ID) methods focus on objects. In this work, we study how to combine the efficiency and scalability of MIM with the ability of ID to perform downstream classification in the absence of large amounts of labeled data. To this end, we introduce Masked Autoencoder Contrastive Tuning (MAE-CT), a sequential approach that utilizes the implicit clustering of the Nearest Neighbor Contrastive Learning (NNCLR) objective to induce abstraction in the topmost layers of a pre-trained MAE. MAE-CT tunes the rich features such that they form semantic clusters of objects without using any labels. Notably, MAE-CT does not rely on hand-crafted augmentations and frequently achieves its best performances while using only minimal augmentations (crop & flip). Further, MAE-CT is compute efficient as it requires at most 10% overhead compared to MAE re-training. Applied to large and huge Vision Transformer (ViT) models, MAE-CT excels over previous self-supervised methods trained on ImageNet in linear probing, k-NN and low-shot classification accuracy as well as in unsupervised clustering accuracy. With ViT-H/16 MAE-CT achieves a new state-of-the-art in linear probing of 82.2%. Project page: github.com/ml-jku/MAE-CT.
Johannes Lehner, Benedikt Alkin, Andreas Fürst, Elisabeth Rumetshofer, Lukas Miklautz, Sepp Hochreiter
AAAI1
2024 Overcoming Saturation in Density Ratio Estimation by Iterated Regularization
abstract
Estimating the ratio of two probability densities from finitely many samples, is a central task in machine learning and statistics. In this work, we show that a large class of kernel methods for density ratio estimation suffers from error saturation, which prevents algorithms from achieving fast error convergence rates on highly regular learning problems. To resolve saturation, we introduce iterated regularization in density ratio estimation to achieve fast error rates. Our methods outperform its non-iteratively regularized versions on benchmarks for density ratio estimation as well as on large-scale evaluations for importance-weighted ensembling of deep unsupervised domain adaptation models.
Lukas Gruber, Markus Holzleitner, Johannes Lehner, Sepp Hochreiter, Werner Zellinger
ICML3
2022 CLOOB: Modern Hopfield Networks with InfoLOOB Outperform CLIP
abstract
CLIP yielded impressive results on zero-shot transfer learning tasks and is considered as a foundation model like BERT or GPT3. CLIP vision models that have a rich representation are pre-trained using the InfoNCE objective and natural language supervision before they are fine-tuned on particular tasks. Though CLIP excels at zero-shot transfer learning, it suffers from an explaining away problem, that is, it focuses on one or few features, while neglecting other relevant features. This problem is caused by insufficiently extracting the covariance structure in the original multi-modal data. We suggest to use modern Hopfield networks to tackle the problem of explaining away. Their retrieved embeddings have an enriched covariance structure derived from co-occurrences of features in the stored embeddings. However, modern Hopfield networks increase the saturation effect of the InfoNCE objective which hampers learning. We propose to use the InfoLOOB objective to mitigate this saturation effect. We introduce the novel "Contrastive Leave One Out Boost" (CLOOB), which uses modern Hopfield networks for covariance enrichment together with the InfoLOOB objective. In experiments we compare CLOOB to CLIP after pre-training on the Conceptual Captions and the YFCC dataset with respect to their zero-shot transfer learning performance on other datasets. CLOOB consistently outperforms CLIP at zero-shot transfer learning across all considered architectures and datasets.
Andreas Fürst, Elisabeth Rumetshofer, Johannes Lehner, Viet T. Tran, Hubert Ramsauer, David P. Kreil, Michael Kopp 0001, Günter Klambauer, Angela Bitto-Nemling, Sepp Hochreiter
NeurIPS3
2021 Hopfield Networks is All You Need
Hubert Ramsauer, Bernhard Schäfl, Johannes Lehner, Philipp Seidl, Michael Widrich, Lukas Gruber, Markus Holzleitner, Thomas Adler, David P. Kreil, Michael Kopp 0001, Günter Klambauer, Johannes Brandstetter, Sepp Hochreiter
ICLR3