Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cooper Stansbury
dblp:232/1577
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD · Bioinform. 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRAD · Bioinform. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 0.9large language model · 0.9agentic system · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Automatic biomarker discovery and enrichment with BRADabstractMOTIVATION: Integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with research tools presents technical and reproducibility challenges for biomedical research. While commercial artificial intelligence (AI) systems are easy to adopt, they obscure data provenance, lack transparency, and can generates false information, making them unfit for many research problems. To address these challenges, we developed the Bioinformatics Retrieval Augmented Digital (BRAD) agent software system. RESULTS: Here, we introduce BRAD, an agentic system that integrates LLMs with external tools and data to streamline research workflows. BRAD's modular agents retrieve information from literature, custom software, and online databases while maintaining transparent protocols to increase the reliability of AI generated results. We apply BRAD to a biomarker discovery pipeline, automating both execution and the generation of enrichment reports. This workflow contextualizes user data within the literature, enabling a level of interpretation and automation that surpasses conventional research tools. Beyond the workflow we highlight here, BRAD is a flexible system that has been deployed in other applications including a chatbot, video RAG, and analysis of single cell data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code for BRAD is available at https://github.com/Jpickard1/BRAD; Information for pip installation, tutorials, documentation, and further information can be found at: ReadTheDocs. Joshua Pickard, Ram Prakash, Marc Andrew Choi, Natalie Oliven, Cooper Stansbury, Jillian Cwycyshyn, Nicholas Galioto, Alex A. Gorodetsky, Alvaro Velasquez, Indika Rajapakse |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2023 | Machine learning-based donor permission extraction from informed consent documentsabstractBACKGROUND: With more clinical trials are offering optional participation in the collection of bio-specimens for biobanking comes the increasing complexity of requirements of informed consent forms. The aim of this study is to develop an automatic natural language processing (NLP) tool to annotate informed consent documents to promote biorepository data regulation, sharing, and decision support. We collected informed consent documents from several publicly available sources, then manually annotated them, covering sentences containing permission information about the sharing of either bio-specimens or donor data, or conducting genetic research or future research using bio-specimens or donor data. RESULTS: We evaluated a variety of machine learning algorithms including random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) for the automatic identification of these sentences. 120 informed consent documents containing 29,204 sentences were annotated, of which 1250 sentences (4.28%) provide answers to a permission question. A support vector machine (SVM) model achieved a F-1 score of 0.95 on classifying the sentences when using a gold standard, which is a prefiltered corpus containing all relevant sentences. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the feasibility of using machine learning tools to classify permission-related sentences in informed consent documents. Madhuri Sankaranarayanapillai, Jingcheng Du, Yang Xiang 0003, Frank J. Manion, Marcelline R. Harris, Cooper Stansbury, Huy Anh Pham, Cui Tao |
BMC Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2023 | HAT: Hypergraph analysis toolboxabstractRecent advances in biological technologies, such as multi-way chromosome conformation capture (3C), require development of methods for analysis of multi-way interactions. Hypergraphs are mathematically tractable objects that can be utilized to precisely represent and analyze multi-way interactions. Here we present the Hypergraph Analysis Toolbox (HAT), a software package for visualization and analysis of multi-way interactions in complex systems. Joshua Pickard, Can Chen 0003, Rahmy Salman, Cooper Stansbury, Sion Kim, Amit Surana, Anthony M. Bloch, Indika Rajapakse |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |
| 2021 | Expressing and Executing Informed Consent Permissions using SWRL: The All of Us Use Case
Muhammad Amith, Marcelline R. Harris, Cooper Stansbury, Kathleen Ford, Frank J. Manion, Cui Tao |
AMIA | 3 |
| 2019 | Toward large-scale management of clinical quality dashboard visualizations: The Performance Summary Display Ontology
Cooper Stansbury, Colin Gross, Veena Panicker, Zach Landis-Lewis |
AMIA | 1 |
| 2019 | Refactoring and Expanding the Informed Consent Ontology (ICO)
Jonathan Vajda, J. Neil Otte, Cooper Stansbury, Marcelline R. Harris, Frank J. Manion, Cui Tao |
AMIA | 3 |
| 2019 | Expanding the Representation of Permissions and Deontic Roles in the Informed Consent Ontology (ICO)
Jonathan Vajda, J. Neil Otte, Cooper Stansbury, Marcelline R. Harris, Elizabeth Umberfield, Frank J. Manion, Cui Tao |
AMIA | 3 |