EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Divyansh Garg
dblp:232/1714
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 51% 3D vision · 36% Autonomous driving · 7% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 24 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
1.7 | 4 | 2020 | Wasserstein Distances for Stereo Disparity Estimation · NeurIPS 2020 Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving · ICLR 2020 End-to-End Pseudo-LiDAR for Image-Based 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropy · ICLR 2023 IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
1.1 | 4 | 2020 | Wasserstein Distances for Stereo Disparity Estimation · NeurIPS 2020 Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving · ICLR 2020 End-to-End Pseudo-LiDAR for Image-Based 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | LISA: Learning Interpretable Skill Abstractions from Language · NeurIPS 2022 IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
agent evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real Websites · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real Websites · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
pseudo-LiDAR |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving · ICLR 2020 End-to-End Pseudo-LiDAR for Image-Based 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2020 |
Human-AI interaction › AI agent
web agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real Websites · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
image-based 3d object detection |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | End-to-End Pseudo-LiDAR for Image-Based 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2020 Pseudo-LiDAR From Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
maximum entropy reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropy · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-value estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropy · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropy · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
hierarchical imitation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | LISA: Learning Interpretable Skill Abstractions from Language · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning › skill learning
skill discovery |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | LISA: Learning Interpretable Skill Abstractions from Language · NeurIPS 2022 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.6 | 2 | 2020 | End-to-End Pseudo-LiDAR for Image-Based 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2020 Wasserstein Distances for Stereo Disparity Estimation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
soft q-learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
3d perception |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving · ICLR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
stereo matching |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Wasserstein Distances for Stereo Disparity Estimation · NeurIPS 2020 |
Information retrieval
web navigation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real Websites · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
stereo depth estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | End-to-End Pseudo-LiDAR for Image-Based 3D Object Detection · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Pseudo-LiDAR From Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Pseudo-LiDAR From Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
programmatic check · 2.6LLM-based judgment · 2.6maximum entropy RL · 0.7extreme q-learning · 0.7vector quantization · 0.6hierarchical policy learning · 0.6inverse soft-q learning · 0.5behavioral cloning · 0.5end-to-end training · 0.4differentiable change of representation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real WebsitesabstractWe introduce REAL, a benchmark and framework for multi-turn agent evaluations on deterministic simulations of real-world websites. REAL comprises high-fidelity, deterministic replicas of 11 widely-used websites across domains such as e-commerce, travel, communication, and professional networking. We also release a benchmark consisting of 112 practical tasks that mirror everyday complex user interactions requiring both accurate information retrieval and state-changing actions. All interactions occur within this fully controlled setting, eliminating safety risks and enabling robust, reproducible evaluation of agent capability and reliability. Our novel evaluation framework combines programmatic checks of website state for action-based tasks with rubric-guided LLM-based judgments for information retrieval. The framework supports both open-source and proprietary agent systems through a flexible evaluation harness that accommodates black-box commands within browser environments, allowing research labs to test agentic systems without modification. Our empirical results show that frontier language models achieve at most a 41% success rate on REAL, highlighting critical gaps in autonomous web navigation and task completion capabilities. Our framework supports easy integration of new tasks, reproducible evaluation, and scalable post-training data generation, marking a significant step forward in evaluating and advancing agent capabilities. Divyansh Garg, Diego Caples, Andis Draguns, Nikil Ravi, Pranav Putta, Naman Garg, Prannay Hebbar, Youngchul Joo, Jindong Gu, Charles London, Christian Schröder de Witt, Sumeet Ramesh Motwani |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropy
Divyansh Garg, Joey Hejna, Matthieu Geist, Stefano Ermon |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | LISA: Learning Interpretable Skill Abstractions from LanguageabstractLearning policies that effectively utilize language instructions in complex, multi-task environments is an important problem in imitation learning. While it is possible to condition on the entire language instruction directly, such an approach could suffer from generalization issues. To encode complex instructions into skills that can generalize to unseen instructions, we propose Learning Interpretable Skill Abstractions (LISA), a hierarchical imitation learning framework that can learn diverse, interpretable skills from language-conditioned demonstrations. LISA uses vector quantization to learn discrete skill codes that are highly correlated with language instructions and the behavior of the learned policy. In navigation and robotic manipulation environments, LISA is able to outperform a strong non-hierarchical baseline in the low data regime and compose learned skills to solve tasks containing unseen long-range instructions. Our method demonstrates a more natural way to condition on language in sequential decision-making problems and achieve interpretable and controllable behavior with the learned skills. Divyansh Garg, Skanda Vaidyanath, Kuno Kim, Jiaming Song, Stefano Ermon |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationabstractIn many sequential decision-making problems (e.g., robotics control, game playing, sequential prediction), human or expert data is available containing useful information about the task. However, imitation learning (IL) from a small amount of expert data can be challenging in high-dimensional environments with complex dynamics. Behavioral cloning is a simple method that is widely used due to its simplicity of implementation and stable convergence but doesn't utilize any information involving the environment’s dynamics. Many existing methods that exploit dynamics information are difficult to train in practice due to an adversarial optimization process over reward and policy approximators or biased, high variance gradient estimators. We introduce a method for dynamics-aware IL which avoids adversarial training by learning a single Q-function, implicitly representing both reward and policy. On standard benchmarks, the implicitly learned rewards show a high positive correlation with the ground-truth rewards, illustrating our method can also be used for inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). Our method, Inverse soft-Q learning (IQ-Learn) obtains state-of-the-art results in offline and online imitation learning settings, significantly outperforming existing methods both in the number of required environment interactions and scalability in high-dimensional spaces, often by more than 3x. Divyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song, Stefano Ermon |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | End-to-End Pseudo-LiDAR for Image-Based 3D Object DetectionabstractReliable and accurate 3D object detection is a necessity for safe autonomous driving. Although LiDAR sensors can provide accurate 3D point cloud estimates of the environment, they are also prohibitively expensive for many settings. Recently, the introduction of pseudo-LiDAR (PL) has led to a drastic reduction in the accuracy gap between methods based on LiDAR sensors and those based on cheap stereo cameras. PL combines state-of-the-art deep neural networks for 3D depth estimation with those for 3D object detection by converting 2D depth map outputs to 3D point cloud inputs. However, so far these two networks have to be trained separately. In this paper, we introduce a new framework based on differentiable Change of Representation (CoR) modules that allow the entire PL pipeline to be trained end-to-end. The resulting framework is compatible with most state-of-the-art networks for both tasks and in combination with PointRCNN improves over PL consistently across all benchmarks --- yielding the highest entry on the KITTI image-based 3D object detection leaderboard at the time of submission. Our code will be made available at https://github.com/mileyan/pseudo-LiDAR_e2e. Rui Qian 0003, Divyansh Garg, Yan Wang 0051, Yurong You, Serge J. Belongie, Bharath Hariharan, Mark E. Campbell, Kilian Q. Weinberger, Wei-Lun Chao |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2020 | Pseudo-LiDAR++: Accurate Depth for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving
Yurong You, Yan Wang 0051, Wei-Lun Chao, Divyansh Garg, Geoff Pleiss, Bharath Hariharan, Mark E. Campbell, Kilian Q. Weinberger |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2020 | Wasserstein Distances for Stereo Disparity EstimationabstractExisting approaches to depth or disparity estimation output a distribution over a set of pre-defined discrete values. This leads to inaccurate results when the true depth or disparity does not match any of these values. The fact that this distribution is usually learned indirectly through a regression loss causes further problems in ambiguous regions around object boundaries. We address these issues using a new neural network architecture that is capable of outputting arbitrary depth values, and a new loss function that is derived from the Wasserstein distance between the true and the predicted distributions. We validate our approach on a variety of tasks, including stereo disparity and depth estimation, and the downstream 3D object detection. Our approach drastically reduces the error in ambiguous regions, especially around object boundaries that greatly affect the localization of objects in 3D, achieving the state-of-the-art in 3D object detection for autonomous driving. Divyansh Garg, Yan Wang 0051, Bharath Hariharan, Mark E. Campbell, Kilian Q. Weinberger, Wei-Lun Chao |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Pseudo-LiDAR From Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingabstract3D object detection is an essential task in autonomous driving. Recent techniques excel with highly accurate detection rates, provided the 3D input data is obtained from precise but expensive LiDAR technology. Approaches based on cheaper monocular or stereo imagery data have, until now, resulted in drastically lower accuracies --- a gap that is commonly attributed to poor image-based depth estimation. However, in this paper we argue that it is not the quality of the data but its representation that accounts for the majority of the difference. Taking the inner workings of convolutional neural networks into consideration, we propose to convert image-based depth maps to pseudo-LiDAR representations --- essentially mimicking the LiDAR signal. With this representation we can apply different existing LiDAR-based detection algorithms. On the popular KITTI benchmark, our approach achieves impressive improvements over the existing state-of-the-art in image-based performance --- raising the detection accuracy of objects within the 30m range from the previous state-of-the-art of 22% to an unprecedented 74%. At the time of submission our algorithm holds the highest entry on the KITTI 3D object detection leaderboard for stereo-image-based approaches. Yan Wang 0051, Wei-Lun Chao, Divyansh Garg, Bharath Hariharan, Mark E. Campbell, Kilian Q. Weinberger |
CVPR | 3 |