Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Alexander Laube

dblp:232/1731 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 67% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation
0.812024
Label-Free Neural Semantic Image Synthesis · ECCV (53) 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation › conditional image synthesis
semantic image synthesis
0.812024
Label-Free Neural Semantic Image Synthesis · ECCV (53) 2024
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Label-Free Neural Semantic Image Synthesis
Kevin Alexander Laube, Jan Hendrik Metzen, Shin-I Cheng, Julio Borges, Anna Khoreva
ECCV (53)2
2019 Prune and Replace NAS
abstract
While recent Neural Architecture Search (NAS) algorithms are thousands of times faster than the pioneering works, it is often overlooked that they use fewer candidate operations, resulting in a significantly smaller search space. We present PR-DARTS, a NAS algorithm that discovers strong network configurations in a much larger search space and a single day. A small candidate operation pool is used, from which candidates are progressively pruned and replaced with better performing ones. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 achieve 2.51% and 15.53% test error, respectively, despite searching in a space where each cell has 150 times as many possible configurations than in the DARTS baseline. All of our code is available at https://github.com/cogsys-tuebingen/prdarts.
Kevin Alexander Laube, Andreas Zell
ICMLA1
2019 ShuffleNASNets: Efficient CNN models through modified Efficient Neural Architecture Search
abstract
Neural network architectures found by sophistic search algorithms achieve strikingly good test performance, surpassing most human-crafted network models by significant margins. Although computationally efficient, their design is often very complex, impairing execution speed. Additionally, finding models outside of the search space is not possible by design. While our space is still limited, we implement undiscoverable expert knowledge into the economic search algorithm Efficient Neural Architecture Search (ENAS), guided by the design principles and architecture of ShuffleNet V2. While maintaining baseline-like 2.85% test error on CIFAR-10, our ShuffleNASNets are significantly less complex, require fewer parameters, and are two times faster than the ENAS baseline in a classification task. These models also scale well to a low parameter space, achieving less than 5% test error with little regularization and only 236K parameters.
Kevin Alexander Laube, Andreas Zell
IJCNN1