Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amirhossein Yazdani Abyaneh

dblp:232/1828 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless networking · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking › cognitive radio › spectrum sharing
coexistence
0.512021
Signal Detection and Classification in Shared Spectrum: A Deep Learning Approach · INFOCOM 2021
Wireless networking › cognitive radio
spectrum sharing
0.112021
Signal Detection and Classification in Shared Spectrum: A Deep Learning Approach · INFOCOM 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

short-time fourier transform · 0.5recurrent neural network · 0.5convolutional neural network · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Signal Detection and Classification in Shared Spectrum: A Deep Learning Approach
abstract
Accurate identification of the signal type in shared-spectrum networks is critical for efficient resource allocation and fair coexistence. It can be used for scheduling transmission opportunities to avoid collisions and improve system throughput, especially when the environment changes rapidly. In this paper, we develop deep neural networks (DNNs) to detect coexisting signal types based on In-phase/Quadrature (I/Q) samples without decoding them. By using segments of the samples of the received signal as input, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) are combined and trained using categorical cross-entropy (CE) optimization. Classification results for coexisting Wi-Fi, LTE LAA, and 5G NR-U signals in the 5-6 GHz unlicensed band show high accuracy of the proposed design. We then exploit spectrum analysis of the I/Q sequences to further improve the classification accuracy. By applying Short-time Fourier Transform (STFT), additional information in the frequency domain can be presented as a spectrogram. Accordingly, we enlarge the input size of the DNN. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed detection framework, we conduct over-the-air (OTA) experiments using USRP radios. The proposed approach can achieve accurate classification in both simulations and hardware experiments.
Wenhan Zhang 0003, Mingjie Feng, Marwan Krunz, Amirhossein Yazdani Abyaneh
INFOCOM4
2021 CWmin Estimation and Collision Identification in Wi-Fi Systems
abstract
Wi-Fi networks are susceptible to aggressive behavior caused by selfish or malicious devices that reduce their minimum contention window size (CWmin) to below the standard CWmin. In this paper, we propose a scheme called Minimum Contention Window Estimation (CWE) to detect aggressive stations with low CWmin’s, where the AP estimates the CWminvalue of all stations transmitting uplink by monitoring their backoff values over a period of time and keeping track of the idle time each station spends during backoff. To correctly estimate each backoff value, we present a cross-correlation based technique that uses the frequency offset between the AP and each station to identify stations involved in uplink collisions. The AP constructs empirical distributions for the monitored backoff values and compares them with a set of nominal PMF’s, created via Markov analysis of the DCF protocol to estimate CWminof various stations. After detecting the aggressive stations, the AP can choose to stop serving those stations. Simulation results show that the accuracy of our collision detection technique is 96%, 94%, and 88% when there are 3, 6, and 9 stations in the WLAN, respectively. For the former WLAN settings, the estimation accuracy of CWE scheme is 100%, 98.81%, and 96.3%, respectively.
Amirhossein Yazdani Abyaneh, Marwan Krunz
MASS1