Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rajendra Ugrani

dblp:232/2029 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0009-0002-6397-0226ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 44% Question answering and dialogue systems · 29% Learning paradigms · 27%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.822020
Iterative Data Programming for Expanding Text Classification Corpora · AAAI 2020
Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning
0.822020
Iterative Data Programming for Expanding Text Classification Corpora · AAAI 2020
Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
data programming
0.522020
Iterative Data Programming for Expanding Text Classification Corpora · AAAI 2020
Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
intent detection
0.522020
Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019
Iterative Data Programming for Expanding Text Classification Corpora · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
conversational agents
0.412019
Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

labeling functions · 0.4iterative data programming · 0.4ensemble learning · 0.4weak supervision · 0.4search-label-propagate · 0.4data programming · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Iterative Data Programming for Expanding Text Classification Corpora
abstract
Real-world text classification tasks often require many labeled training examples that are expensive to obtain. Recent advancements in machine teaching, specifically the data programming paradigm, facilitate the creation of training data sets quickly via a general framework for building weak models, also known as labeling functions, and denoising them through ensemble learning techniques. We present a fast, simple data programming method for augmenting text data sets by generating neighborhood-based weak models with minimal supervision. Furthermore, our method employs an iterative procedure to identify sparsely distributed examples from large volumes of unlabeled data. The iterative data programming techniques improve newer weak models as more labeled data is confirmed with human-in-loop. We show empirical results on sentence classification tasks, including those from a task of improving intent recognition in conversational agents.
Neil Mallinar, Abhishek Shah, Tin Kam Ho, Rajendra Ugrani
AAAI4
2019 Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision
abstract
Many conversational agents in the market today follow a standard bot development framework which requires training intent classifiers to recognize user input. The need to create a proper set of training examples is often the bottleneck in the development process. In many occasions agent developers have access to historical chat logs that can provide a good quantity as well as coverage of training examples. However, the cost of labeling them with tens to hundreds of intents often prohibits taking full advantage of these chat logs. In this paper, we present a framework called search, label, and propagate (SLP) for bootstrapping intents from existing chat logs using weak supervision. The framework reduces hours to days of labeling effort down to minutes of work by using a search engine to find examples, then relies on a data programming approach to automatically expand the labels. We report on a user study that shows positive user feedback for this new approach to build conversational agents, and demonstrates the effectiveness of using data programming for autolabeling. While the system is developed for training conversational agents, the framework has broader application in significantly reducing labeling effort for training text classifiers.
Neil Mallinar, Abhishek Shah, Rajendra Ugrani, Manikandan Gurusankar, Tin Kam Ho, Qingzi Vera Liao, Rachel K. E. Bellamy, Robert Yates, Chris Desmarais, Blake McGregor
AAAI3