Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lisa Tse
dblp:232/2241
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 72% Learning paradigms · 14% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 13% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Online Matrix Completion with Side Information · NeurIPS 2020 Online Multitask Learning with Long-Term Memory · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
matrix completion |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Online Matrix Completion with Side Information · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
mistake bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Online Matrix Completion with Side Information · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Online Multitask Learning with Long-Term Memory · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Online Multitask Learning with Long-Term Memory · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.3 | 2 | 2020 | Online Matrix Completion with Side Information · NeurIPS 2020 Online Multitask Learning with Long-Term Memory · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
reproducing kernel hilbert space |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Online Multitask Learning with Long-Term Memory · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
switching with long-term memory · 0.4side information · 0.4regret analysis · 0.4perceptron bounds · 0.4matrix factorization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Online Multitask Learning with Long-Term MemoryabstractWe introduce a novel online multitask setting. In this setting each task is partitioned into a sequence of segments that is unknown to the learner. Associated with each segment is a hypothesis from some hypothesis class. We give algorithms that are designed to exploit the scenario where there are many such segments but significantly fewer associated hypotheses. We prove regret bounds that hold for any segmentation of the tasks and any association of hypotheses to the segments. In the single-task setting this is equivalent to switching with long-term memory in the sense of [Bousquet and Warmuth 2011]. We provide an algorithm that predicts on each trial in time linear in the number of hypotheses when the hypothesis class is finite. We also consider infinite hypothesis classes from reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces for which we give an algorithm whose per trial time complexity is cubic in the number of cumulative trials. In the single-task special case this is the first example of an efficient regret-bounded switching algorithm with long-term memory for a non-parametric hypothesis class. Mark Herbster, Stephen Pasteris, Lisa Tse |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Online Matrix Completion with Side InformationabstractWe give an online algorithm and prove novel mistake and regret bounds for online binary matrix completion with side information. The mistake bounds we prove are of the form \tilde{O}(D/\gamma^2). The term 1/\gamma^2 is analogous to the usual margin term in SVM (perceptron) bounds. More specifically, if we assume that there is some factorization of the underlying m x n matrix into PQ^T, where the rows of P are interpreted as "classifiers" in R^d and the rows of Q as "instances" in R^d, then gamma is the maximum (normalized) margin over all factorizations PQ^T consistent with the observed matrix. The quasi-dimension term D measures the quality of side information. In the presence of vacuous side information, D = m+n. However, if the side information is predictive of the underlying factorization of the matrix, then in an ideal case, D \in O(k + l) where k is the number of distinct row factors and l is the number of distinct column factors. We additionally provide a generalization of our algorithm to the inductive setting. In this setting, we provide an example where the side information is not directly specified in advance. For this example, the quasi-dimension D is now bounded by O(k^2 + l^2). Mark Herbster, Stephen Pasteris, Lisa Tse |
NeurIPS | 3 |