Pranoy Panda

dblp:232/2445 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-4457-9909ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 77% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 8%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
coarse-to-fine detection
0.812024
C2FDrone: Coarse-to-Fine Drone-to-Drone Detection using Vision Transformer Networks · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.812024
C2FDrone: Coarse-to-Fine Drone-to-Drone Detection using Vision Transformer Networks · ICRA 2024
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
small object detection
0.812024
C2FDrone: Coarse-to-Fine Drone-to-Drone Detection using Vision Transformer Networks · ICRA 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model deployment
edge deployment
0.212024
C2FDrone: Coarse-to-Fine Drone-to-Drone Detection using Vision Transformer Networks · ICRA 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.212024
C2FDrone: Coarse-to-Fine Drone-to-Drone Detection using Vision Transformer Networks · ICRA 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph
0.212024
HOLMES: Hyper-Relational Knowledge Graphs for Multi-hop Question Answering using LLMs · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision transformer · 0.8multi-scale feature fusion · 0.8large language model · 0.8knowledge graph distillation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 HOLMES: Hyper-Relational Knowledge Graphs for Multi-hop Question Answering using LLMs
abstract
Given unstructured text, Large Language Models (LLMs) are adept at answering simple (single-hop) questions.However, as the complexity of the questions increase, the performance of LLMs degrade.We believe this is due to the overhead associated with understanding the complex question followed by filtering and aggregating unstructured information in the raw text.Recent methods try to reduce this burden by integrating structured knowledge triples into the raw text, aiming to provide a structured overview that simplifies information processing.However, this simplistic approach is query-agnostic and the extracted facts are ambiguous as they lack context.To address these drawbacks and to enable LLMs to answer complex (multi-hop) questions with ease, we propose to use a knowledge graph (KG) that is context-aware and is distilled to contain query-relevant information.The use of our compressed distilled KG as input to the LLM results in our method utilizing up to 67% fewer tokens to represent the query relevant information present in the supporting documents, compared to the state-of-the-art (SoTA) method.Our experiments show consistent improvements over the SoTA across several metrics (EM, F1, BERTScore, and Human Eval) on two popular benchmark datasets (HotpotQA and MuSiQue).
Pranoy Panda, Ankush Agarwal, Chaitanya Devaguptapu, Manohar Kaul, Prathosh A. P.
ACL (1)1
2024 FW-Shapley: Real-Time Estimation of Weighted Shapley Values
abstract
Fair credit assignment is essential in various machine learning (ML) applications, and Shapley values have emerged as a valuable tool for this purpose. However, in critical ML applications such as data valuation and feature attribution, the uniform weighting of Shapley values across subset cardinalities leads to unintuitive credit assignments. To address this, weighted Shapley values were proposed as a generalization, allowing different weights for subsets with different cardinalities. Despite their advantages, similar to Shapley values, Weighted Shapley values suffer from exponential compute costs, making them impractical for high-dimensional datasets. To tackle this issue, we present two key contributions. Firstly, we provide a weighted least squares characterization of weighted Shapley values. Next, using this characterization, we propose Fast Weighted Shapley (FW-Shapley), an amortized framework for efficiently computing weighted Shapley values using a learned estimator. We further show that our estimator's training procedure is theoretically valid even though we do not use ground truth Weighted Shapley values during training. On the feature attribution task, we outperform the learned estimator FastSHAP by 27% (on average) in terms of Inclusion AUC. For data valuation, we are much faster (14 times) while being comparable to the state-of-the-art KNN Shapley.
Pranoy Panda, Siddharth Tandon, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian
ICASSP1
2024 C2FDrone: Coarse-to-Fine Drone-to-Drone Detection using Vision Transformer Networks
abstract
A vision-based drone-to-drone detection system is crucial for various applications like collision avoidance, countering hostile drones, and search-and-rescue operations. However, detecting drones presents unique challenges, including small object sizes, distortion, occlusion, and real-time processing requirements. Current methods integrating multi-scale feature fusion and temporal information have limitations in handling extreme blur and minuscule objects. To address this, we propose a novel coarse-to-fine detection strategy based on vision transformers. We evaluate our approach on three challenging drone- to-drone detection datasets, achieving F1 score enhancements of 7%, 3%, and 1% on the FL-Drones, AOT, and NPS-Drones datasets, respectively. Additionally, we demonstrate real-time processing capabilities by deploying our model on an edge-computing device. Our code will be made publicly available.
Sairam VC Rebbapragada, Pranoy Panda, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian
ICRA2