Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Evan Nichols

dblp:232/3209 · also Evan L. Nichols · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising
0.412019
A Poisson-Gaussian Denoising Dataset With Real Fluorescence Microscopy Images · CVPR 2019
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising › mixed noise removal
poisson-gaussian denoising
0.412019
A Poisson-Gaussian Denoising Dataset With Real Fluorescence Microscopy Images · CVPR 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › bioimage analysis › microscopy image analysis
fluorescence microscopy
0.112019
A Poisson-Gaussian Denoising Dataset With Real Fluorescence Microscopy Images · CVPR 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

image averaging · 0.8denoising benchmarking · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 A Poisson-Gaussian Denoising Dataset With Real Fluorescence Microscopy Images
abstract
Fluorescence microscopy has enabled a dramatic development in modern biology. Due to its inherently weak signal, fluorescence microscopy is not only much noisier than photography, but also presented with Poisson-Gaussian noise where Poisson noise, or shot noise, is the dominating noise source. To get clean fluorescence microscopy images, it is highly desirable to have effective denoising algorithms and datasets that are specifically designed to denoise fluorescence microscopy images. While such algorithms exist, no such datasets are available. In this paper, we fill this gap by constructing a dataset - the Fluorescence Microscopy Denoising (FMD) dataset - that is dedicated to Poisson-Gaussian denoising. The dataset consists of 12,000 real fluorescence microscopy images obtained with commercial confocal, two-photon, and wide-field microscopes and representative biological samples such as cells, zebrafish, and mouse brain tissues. We use image averaging to effectively obtain ground truth images and 60,000 noisy images with different noise levels. We use this dataset to benchmark 10 representative denoising algorithms and find that deep learning methods have the best performance. To our knowledge, this is the first real microscopy image dataset for Poisson-Gaussian denoising purposes and it could be an important tool for high-quality, real-time denoising applications in biomedical research.
Yide Zhang, Yinhao Zhu, Evan Nichols, Qingfei Wang, Cody J. Smith, Scott S. Howard
CVPR3