Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Danny Stoll

dblp:232/3297 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7748-4512ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 49% Optimization for machine learning · 43% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 3%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
1.732023
Construction of Hierarchical Neural Architecture Search Spaces based on Context-free Grammars · NeurIPS 2023
JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022
Winning Solutions and Post-Challenge Analyses of the ChaLearn AutoDL Challenge 2019 · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.712023
PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
multi-fidelity hyperparameter tuning
0.712023
PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function
0.612022
$\pi$BO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.612022
$\pi$BO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian Optimization · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
hyperparameter and architecture selection
0.612022
JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.612022
JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › parallel benchmark suites
NAS parallel benchmarks
0.612022
JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
automated machine learning
0.512021
Winning Solutions and Post-Challenge Analyses of the ChaLearn AutoDL Challenge 2019 · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA design
0.412019
Learning to Design RNA · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA design
RNA inverse folding
0.412019
Learning to Design RNA · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Automata and formal languages › formal grammars
context-free grammar
0.212023
Construction of Hierarchical Neural Architecture Search Spaces based on Context-free Grammars · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.112021
Winning Solutions and Post-Challenge Analyses of the ChaLearn AutoDL Challenge 2019 · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.112021
Winning Solutions and Post-Challenge Analyses of the ChaLearn AutoDL Challenge 2019 · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian optimization · 2.0context-free grammar · 1.3surrogate benchmarks · 1.1multi-fidelity optimization · 1.1proxy task · 0.7pre-trained network fine-tuning · 0.5model selection · 0.5data ingestion · 0.5machine learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learning
abstract
Hyperparameters of Deep Learning (DL) pipelines are crucial for their downstream performance. While a large number of methods for Hyperparameter Optimization (HPO) have been developed, their incurred costs are often untenable for modern DL. Consequently, manual experimentation is still the most prevalent approach to optimize hyperparameters, relying on the researcher's intuition, domain knowledge, and cheap preliminary explorations. To resolve this misalignment between HPO algorithms and DL researchers, we propose PriorBand, an HPO algorithm tailored to DL, able to utilize both expert beliefs and cheap proxy tasks. Empirically, we demonstrate PriorBand's efficiency across a range of DL benchmarks and show its gains under informative expert input and robustness against poor expert beliefs.
Neeratyoy Mallik, Edward Bergman, Carl Hvarfner, Danny Stoll, Maciej Janowski, Marius Lindauer, Luigi Nardi, Frank Hutter
NeurIPS4
2023 Construction of Hierarchical Neural Architecture Search Spaces based on Context-free Grammars
abstract
The discovery of neural architectures from simple building blocks is a long-standing goal of Neural Architecture Search (NAS). Hierarchical search spaces are a promising step towards this goal but lack a unifying search space design framework and typically only search over some limited aspect of architectures. In this work, we introduce a unifying search space design framework based on context-free grammars that can naturally and compactly generate expressive hierarchical search spaces that are 100s of orders of magnitude larger than common spaces from the literature. By enhancing and using their properties, we effectively enable search over the complete architecture and can foster regularity. Further, we propose an efficient hierarchical kernel design for a Bayesian Optimization search strategy to efficiently search over such huge spaces. We demonstrate the versatility of our search space design framework and show that our search strategy can be superior to existing NAS approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/automl/hierarchical_nas_construction.
Simon Schrodi, Danny Stoll, Binxin Ru, Rhea Sanjay Sukthanker, Thomas Brox, Frank Hutter
NeurIPS2
2022 $\pi$BO: Augmenting Acquisition Functions with User Beliefs for Bayesian Optimization
Carl Hvarfner, Danny Stoll, Artur L. F. Souza, Marius Lindauer, Frank Hutter, Luigi Nardi
ICLR2
2022 JAHS-Bench-201: A Foundation For Research On Joint Architecture And Hyperparameter Search
abstract
The past few years have seen the development of many benchmarks for Neural Architecture Search (NAS), fueling rapid progress in NAS research. However, recent work, which shows that good hyperparameter settings can be more important than using the best architecture, calls for a shift in focus towards Joint Architecture and Hyperparameter Search (JAHS). Therefore, we present JAHS-Bench-201, the first collection of surrogate benchmarks for JAHS, built to also facilitate research on multi-objective, cost-aware and (multi) multi-fidelity optimization algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, JAHS-Bench-201 is based on the most extensive dataset of neural network performance data in the public domain. It is composed of approximately 161 million data points and 20 performance metrics for three deep learning tasks, while featuring a 14-dimensional search and fidelity space that extends the popular NAS-Bench-201 space. With JAHS-Bench-201, we hope to democratize research on JAHS and lower the barrier to entry of an extremely compute intensive field, e.g., by reducing the compute time to run a JAHS algorithm from 5 days to only a few seconds.
Archit Bansal, Danny Stoll, Maciej Janowski, Arber Zela, Frank Hutter
NeurIPS2
2021 Winning Solutions and Post-Challenge Analyses of the ChaLearn AutoDL Challenge 2019
abstract
This paper reports the results and post-challenge analyses of ChaLearn's AutoDL challenge series, which helped sorting out a profusion of AutoML solutions for Deep Learning (DL) that had been introduced in a variety of settings, but lacked fair comparisons. All input data modalities (time series, images, videos, text, tabular) were formatted as tensors and all tasks were multi-label classification problems. Code submissions were executed on hidden tasks, with limited time and computational resources, pushing solutions that get results quickly. In this setting, DL methods dominated, though popular Neural Architecture Search (NAS) was impractical. Solutions relied on fine-tuned pre-trained networks, with architectures matching data modality. Post-challenge tests did not reveal improvements beyond the imposed time limit. While no component is particularly original or novel, a high level modular organization emerged featuring a "meta-learner", "data ingestor", "model selector", "model/learner", and "evaluator". This modularity enabled ablation studies, which revealed the importance of (off-platform) meta-learning, ensembling, and efficient data management. Experiments on heterogeneous module combinations further confirm the (local) optimality of the winning solutions. Our challenge legacy includes an ever-lasting benchmark (http://autodl.chalearn.org), the open-sourced code of the winners, and a free "AutoDL self-service."
Zhengying Liu, Adrien Pavão, Zhen Xu 0007, Sergio Escalera, Fabio Ferreira, Isabelle Guyon, Sirui Hong, Frank Hutter, Rongrong Ji, Júlio C. S. Jacques Júnior, Marius Lindauer, Meysam Madadi, Thomas Nierhoff, Kangning Niu, Chunguang Pan, Danny Stoll, Sébastien Treguer, Peng Wang 0095, Chenglin Wu 0001, Youcheng Xiong, Arber Zela, Yang Zhang 0079
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.18
2019 Learning to Design RNA
Frederic Runge, Danny Stoll, Stefan Falkner, Frank Hutter
ICLR (Poster)2