Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ying-Yong Zhao
dblp:232/3628
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-0239-7342ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
functional annotation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | AnnoGen: annotating genome-wide pragmatic features · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | AnnoGen: annotating genome-wide pragmatic features · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequence entropy · 0.4homology scoring · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | MutEx: a multifaceted gateway for exploring integrative pan-cancer genomic dataabstractSomatic mutation and gene expression dysregulation are considered two major tumorigenesis factors. While independent investigations of either factor pervade, studies of associations between somatic mutations and gene expression changes have been sporadic and nonsystematic. Utilizing genomic data collected from 11 315 subjects of 33 distinct cancer types, we constructed MutEx, a pan-cancer integrative genomic database. This database records the relationships among gene expression, somatic mutation and survival data for cancer patients. MutEx can be used to swiftly explore the relationship between these genomic/clinic features within and across cancer types and, more importantly, search for corroborating evidence for hypothesis inception. Our database also incorporated Gene Ontology and several pathway databases to enhance functional annotation, and elastic net and a gene expression composite score to aid in survival analysis. To demonstrate the usability of MutEx, we provide several application examples, including top somatic mutations associated with the most extensive expression dysregulation in breast cancer, differential mutational burden downstream of DNA mismatch repair gene mutations and composite gene expression score-based survival difference in breast cancer. MutEx can be accessed at http://www.innovebioinfo.com/Databases/Mutationdb_About.php. Jie Ping, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji, Scott Ness, Jeremy Chien, Huining Kang, David C. Samuels, Danqian Chen, Ying-Yong Zhao, Yan Guo 0015 |
Briefings Bioinform. | 11 |
| 2020 | Cancer-specific expression quantitative loci are affected by expression dysregulationabstractExpression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) have been touted as the missing piece that can bridge the gap between genetic variants and phenotypes. Over the past decade, we have witnessed a sharp rise of effort in the identification and application of eQTLs. The successful application of eQTLs relies heavily on their reproducibility. The current eQTL databases such as Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) were populated primarily with eQTLs deriving from germline single nucleotide polymorphisms and normal tissue gene expression. The novel scenarios that employ eQTL models for prediction purposes often involve disease phenotypes characterized by altered gene expressions. To evaluate eQTL reproducibility across diverse data sources and the effect of disease-specific gene expression alteration on eQTL identification, we conducted an eQTL study using 5178 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We found that the reproducibility of eQTLs between normal and tumor tissues was low in terms of the number of shared eQTLs. However, among the shared eQTLs, the effect directions were generally concordant. This suggests that the source of the gene expression (normal or tumor tissue) has a strong effect on the detectable eQTLs and the effect direction of the eQTLs. Additional analyses demonstrated good directional concordance of eQTLs between GTEx and TCGA. Furthermore, we found that multi-tissue eQTLs may exert opposite effects across multiple tissue types. In summary, our results suggest that eQTL prediction models need to carefully address tissue and disease dependency of eQTLs. Tissue-disease-specific eQTL databases can afford more accurate prediction models for future studies. Quanhu Sheng, David C. Samuels, Scott Ness, Ying-Yong Zhao, Yan Guo 0015 |
Briefings Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2020 | AnnoGen: annotating genome-wide pragmatic featuresabstractMOTIVATION: Genome annotation is an important step for all in-depth bioinformatics analysis. It is imperative to augment quantity and diversity of genome-wide annotation data for the latest reference genome to promote its adoption by ongoing and future impactful studies. RESULTS: We developed a python toolkit AnnoGen, which at the first time, allows the annotation of three pragmatic genomic features for the GRCh38 genome in enormous base-wise quantities. The three features are chemical binding Energy, sequence information Entropy and Homology Score. The Homology Score is an exceptional feature that captures the genome-wide homology through single-base-offset tiling windows of 100 continual nucleotide bases. AnnoGen is capable of annotating the proprietary pragmatic features for variable user-interested genomic regions and optionally comparing two parallel sets of genomic regions. AnnoGen is characterized with simple utility modes and succinct HTML report of informative statistical tables and plots. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/shengqh/annogen. Quanhu Sheng, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji, Danqian Chen, Scott Ness, Ying-Yong Zhao, Yan Guo 0015 |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2020 | Non-canonical RNA-DNA differences and other human genomic features are enriched within very short tandem repeatsabstractVery short tandem repeats bear substantial genetic, evolutional, and pathological significance in genome analyses. Here, we compiled a census of tandem mono-nucleotide/di-nucleotide/tri-nucleotide repeats (MNRs/DNRs/TNRs) in GRCh38, which we term "polytracts" in general. Of the human genome, 144.4 million nucleotides (4.7%) are occupied by polytracts, and 0.47 million single nucleotides are identified as polytract hinges, i.e., break-points of tandem polytracts. Preliminary exploration of the census suggested polytract hinge sites and boundaries of AAC polytracts may bear a higher mapping error rate than other polytract regions. Further, we revealed landscapes of polytract enrichment with respect to nearly a hundred genomic features. We found MNRs, DNRs, and TNRs displayed noticeable difference in terms of locational enrichment for miscellaneous genomic features, especially RNA editing events. Non-canonical and C-to-U RNA-editing events are enriched inside and/or adjacent to MNRs, while all categories of RNA-editing events are under-represented in DNRs. A-to-I RNA-editing events are generally under-represented in polytracts. The selective enrichment of non-canonical RNA-editing events within MNR adjacency provides a negative evidence against their authenticity. To enable similar locational enrichment analyses in relation to polytracts, we developed a software Polytrap which can handle 11 reference genomes. Additionally, we compiled polytracts of four model organisms into a Track Hub which can be integrated into USCS Genome Browser as an official track for convenient visualization of polytracts. Shilin Zhao, Scott Ness, Huining Kang, Quanhu Sheng, David C. Samuels, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji, Ying-Yong Zhao |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 8 |
| 2018 | Power and sample size calculations for high-throughput sequencing-based experimentsabstractPower/sample size (power) analysis estimates the likelihood of successfully finding the statistical significance in a data set. There has been a growing recognition of the importance of power analysis in the proper design of experiments. Power analysis is complex, yet necessary for the success of large studies. It is important to design a study that produces statistically accurate and reliable results. Power computation methods have been well established for both microarray-based gene expression studies and genotyping microarray-based genome-wide association studies. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) has greatly enhanced our ability to conduct biomedical studies at the highest possible resolution (per nucleotide). However, the complexity of power computations is much greater for sequencing data than for the simpler genotyping array data. Research on methods of power computations for HTS-based studies has been recently conducted but is not yet well known or widely used. In this article, we describe the power computation methods that are currently available for a range of HTS-based studies, including DNA sequencing, RNA-sequencing, microbiome sequencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing. Most importantly, we review the methods of power analysis for several types of sequencing data and guide the reader to the relevant methods for each data type. Chung-I Li, David C. Samuels, Ying-Yong Zhao, Shyr Yu |
Briefings Bioinform. | 3 |