Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ayush Bharti
dblp:232/3957
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4577-8049ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 9 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
simulation-based inference |
3.6 | 5 | 2025 | Multilevel neural simulation-based inference · NeurIPS 2025 Robust Simulation-Based Inference under Missing Data via Neural Processes · ICLR 2025 Learning Robust Statistics for Simulation-based Inference under Model Misspecification · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference › simulation-based inference
neural posterior estimation |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Robust Simulation-Based Inference under Missing Data via Neural Processes · ICLR 2025 Learning Robust Statistics for Simulation-based Inference under Model Misspecification · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
approximate bayesian computation |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Optimally-weighted Estimators of the Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Likelihood-Free Inference · ICML 2023 Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | ALINE: Joint Amortization for Bayesian Inference and Active Data Acquisition · NeurIPS 2025 Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
amortized bayesian inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ALINE: Joint Amortization for Bayesian Inference and Active Data Acquisition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › experimental design
bayesian experimental design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ALINE: Joint Amortization for Bayesian Inference and Active Data Acquisition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
missing data |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Robust Simulation-Based Inference under Missing Data via Neural Processes · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
multilevel monte carlo |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multilevel neural simulation-based inference · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
model misspecification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Robust Statistics for Simulation-based Inference under Model Misspecification · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
divergence estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Optimally-weighted Estimators of the Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Likelihood-Free Inference · ICML 2023 |
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
maximum mean discrepancy |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Optimally-weighted Estimators of the Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Likelihood-Free Inference · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sample complexity analysis · 1.3optimally-weighted estimators · 1.3transformer · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9neural processes · 0.9neural posterior estimation · 0.9multilevel monte carlo · 0.9amortized inference · 0.9regularized loss function · 0.7approximate bayesian computation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Cost-aware simulation-based inferenceabstractSimulation-based inference (SBI) is rapidly becoming the preferred framework for estimating parameters of intractable models in science and engineering. A significant challenge in this context is the large computational cost of simulating data from complex models, and the fact that this cost often depends on parameter values. We therefore propose \emph{cost-aware SBI methods} which can significantly reduce the cost of existing sampling-based SBI methods, such as neural SBI and approximate Bayesian computation. This is achieved through a combination of rejection and self-normalised importance sampling, which significantly reduces the number of expensive simulations needed. Our approach is studied extensively on models from epidemiology to telecommunications engineering, where we obtain significant reductions in the overall cost of inference. Ayush Bharti, Daolang Huang, Samuel Kaski, François-Xavier Briol |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2025 | Robust Simulation-Based Inference under Missing Data via Neural ProcessesabstractSimulation-based inference (SBI) methods typically require fully observed data to infer parameters of models with intractable likelihood functions. However, datasets often contain missing values due to incomplete observations, data corruptions (common in astrophysics), or instrument limitations (e.g., in high-energy physics applications). In such scenarios, missing data must be imputed before applying any SBI method. We formalize the problem of missing data in SBI and demonstrate that naive imputation methods can introduce bias in the estimation of SBI posterior. We also introduce a novel amortized method that addresses this issue by jointly learning the imputation model and the inference network within a neural posterior estimation (NPE) framework. Extensive empirical results on SBI benchmarks show that our approach provides robust inference outcomes compared to standard baselines for varying levels of missing data. Moreover, we demonstrate the merits of our imputation model on two real-world bioactivity datasets (Adrenergic and Kinase assays). Code is available at https://github.com/Aalto-QuML/RISE. Yogesh Verma, Ayush Bharti, Vikas Garg 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Multilevel neural simulation-based inferenceabstractNeural simulation-based inference (SBI) is a popular set of methods for Bayesian inference when models are only available in the form of a simulator. These methods are widely used in the sciences and engineering, where writing down a likelihood can be significantly more challenging than constructing a simulator. However, the performance of neural SBI can suffer when simulators are computationally expensive, thereby limiting the number of simulations that can be performed. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to neural SBI which leverages multilevel Monte Carlo techniques for settings where several simulators of varying cost and fidelity are available. We demonstrate through both theoretical analysis and extensive experiments that our method can significantly enhance the accuracy of SBI methods given a fixed computational budget. Yuga Hikida, Ayush Bharti, Niall Jeffrey, François-Xavier Briol |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | ALINE: Joint Amortization for Bayesian Inference and Active Data AcquisitionabstractMany critical applications, from autonomous scientific discovery to personalized medicine, demand systems that can both strategically acquire the most informative data and instantaneously perform inference based upon it. While amortized methods for Bayesian inference and experimental design offer part of the solution, neither approach is optimal in the most general and challenging task, where new data needs to be collected for instant inference. To tackle this issue, we introduce the Amortized Active Learning and Inference Engine (ALINE), a unified framework for amortized Bayesian inference and active data acquisition. ALINE leverages a transformer architecture trained via reinforcement learning with a reward based on self-estimated information gain provided by its own integrated inference component. This allows it to strategically query informative data points while simultaneously refining its predictions. Moreover, ALINE can selectively direct its querying strategy towards specific subsets of model parameters or designated predictive tasks, optimizing for posterior estimation, data prediction, or a mixture thereof. Empirical results on regression-based active learning, classical Bayesian experimental design benchmarks, and a psychometric model with selectively targeted parameters demonstrate that ALINE delivers both instant and accurate inference along with efficient selection of informative points. Daolang Huang, Xinyi Wen, Ayush Bharti, Samuel Kaski, Luigi Acerbi |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Learning relevant contextual variables within Bayesian optimizationabstractContextual Bayesian Optimization (CBO) efficiently optimizes black-box functions with respect to design variables, while simultaneously integrating _contextual_ information regarding the environment, such as experimental conditions. However, the relevance of contextual variables is not necessarily known beforehand. Moreover, contextual variables can sometimes be optimized themselves at additional cost, a setting overlooked by current CBO algorithms. Cost-sensitive CBO would simply include optimizable contextual variables as part of the design variables based on their cost. Instead, we adaptively select a subset of contextual variables to include in the optimization, based on the trade-off between their _relevance_ and the additional cost incurred by optimizing them compared to leaving them to be determined by the environment. We learn the relevance of contextual variables by sensitivity analysis of the posterior surrogate model while minimizing the cost of optimization by leveraging recent developments on early stopping for BO. We empirically evaluate our proposed Sensitivity-Analysis-Driven Contextual BO (_SADCBO_) method against alternatives on both synthetic and real-world experiments, together with extensive ablation studies, and demonstrate a consistent improvement across examples. Julien Martinelli, Ayush Bharti, Armi Tiihonen, S. T. John, Louis Filstroff, Sabina Sloman, Patrick Rinke, Samuel Kaski |
UAI | 2 |
| 2024 | Bayesian Active Learning in the Presence of Nuisance ParametersabstractIn many settings, such as scientific inference, optimization, and transfer learning, the learner has a well-defined objective, which can be treated as estimation of a target parameter, and no intrinsic interest in characterizing the entire data-generating process. Usually, the learner must also contend with additional sources of uncertainty or variables — with nuisance parameters. Bayesian active learning, or sequential optimal experimental design, can straightforwardly accommodate the presence of nuisance parameters, and so is a natural active learning framework for such problems. However, the introduction of nuisance parameters can lead to bias in the Bayesian learner’s estimate of the target parameters, a phenomenon we refer to as negative interference. We characterize the threat of negative interference and how it fundamentally changes the nature of the Bayesian active learner’s task. We show that the extent of negative interference can be extremely large, and that accurate estimation of the nuisance parameters is critical to reducing it. The Bayesian active learner is confronted with a dilemma: whether to spend a finite acquisition budget in pursuit of estimation of the target or of the nuisance parameters. Our setting encompasses Bayesian transfer learning as a special case, and our results shed light on the phenomenon of negative transfer between learning environments. Sabina Sloman, Ayush Bharti, Julien Martinelli, Samuel Kaski |
UAI | 2 |
| 2023 | Optimally-weighted Estimators of the Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Likelihood-Free InferenceabstractLikelihood-free inference methods typically make use of a distance between simulated and real data. A common example is the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), which has previously been used for approximate Bayesian computation, minimum distance estimation, generalised Bayesian inference, and within the nonparametric learning framework. The MMD is commonly estimated at a root-$m$ rate, where $m$ is the number of simulated samples. This can lead to significant computational challenges since a large $m$ is required to obtain an accurate estimate, which is crucial for parameter estimation. In this paper, we propose a novel estimator for the MMD with significantly improved sample complexity. The estimator is particularly well suited for computationally expensive smooth simulators with low- to mid-dimensional inputs. This claim is supported through both theoretical results and an extensive simulation study on benchmark simulators. Ayush Bharti, Masha Naslidnyk, Oscar Key, Samuel Kaski, François-Xavier Briol |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Learning Robust Statistics for Simulation-based Inference under Model MisspecificationabstractSimulation-based inference (SBI) methods such as approximate Bayesian computation (ABC), synthetic likelihood, and neural posterior estimation (NPE) rely on simulating statistics to infer parameters of intractable likelihood models. However, such methods are known to yield untrustworthy and misleading inference outcomes under model misspecification, thus hindering their widespread applicability. In this work, we propose the first general approach to handle model misspecification that works across different classes of SBI methods. Leveraging the fact that the choice of statistics determines the degree of misspecification in SBI, we introduce a regularized loss function that penalizes those statistics that increase the mismatch between the data and the model. Taking NPE and ABC as use cases, we demonstrate the superior performance of our method on high-dimensional time-series models that are artificially misspecified. We also apply our method to real data from the field of radio propagation where the model is known to be misspecified. We show empirically that the method yields robust inference in misspecified scenarios, whilst still being accurate when the model is well-specified. Daolang Huang, Ayush Bharti, Amauri H. Souza, Luigi Acerbi, Samuel Kaski |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the LoopabstractApproximate Bayesian computation (ABC) is a popular likelihood-free inference method for models with intractable likelihood functions. As ABC methods usually rely on comparing summary statistics of observed and simulated data, the choice of the statistics is crucial. This choice involves a trade-off between loss of information and dimensionality reduction, and is often determined based on domain knowledge. However, handcrafting and selecting suitable statistics is a laborious task involving multiple trial-and-error steps. In this work, we introduce an active learning method for ABC statistics selection which reduces the domain expert’s work considerably. By involving the experts, we are able to handle misspecified models, unlike the existing dimension reduction methods. Moreover, empirical results show better posterior estimates than with existing methods, when the simulation budget is limited. Ayush Bharti, Louis Filstroff, Samuel Kaski |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Transfer Function Computation for Complex Indoor Channels Using Propagation GraphsabstractThis paper presents a low complexity method for computation of the transfer matrix of wireless channels in complex indoor environments using propagation graphs. Multi-room indoor environments can be represented in a vector signal flow graph with with rooms in the complex structure as nodes and propagation between rooms as branches. The transfer matrix can be computed using Masons theorem which lead to a much-reduced computational complexity. Ramoni O. Adeogun, Troels Pedersen, Ayush Bharti |
PIMRC | 3 |