While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at many reasoning tasks, their native inability to produce calibrated, multi-class probability distributions limits their use in high-stakes Web applications like content moderation and fraud detection. Existing methods to elicit probabilities from LLMs either sacrifice their crucial Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning capabilities or suffer from poor calibration. To address this, we introduce a new paradigm, Verbalized Probability Distribution, and a novel training framework, RLVP (Reinforcement Learning with Verbalized Probabilities). RLVP fine-tunes an LLM to generate both an interpretable CoT and a complete, verbalized probability distribution. We overcome the ''insufficient reward granularity'' problem in standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) for classification by using soft probabilities from expert tabular models as a dense reward curriculum. Through large-scale joint training on 169 tabular tasks, we demonstrate that a single RLVP-trained model can surpass a strong, task-specific XGBoost baseline on up to 55% of tasks. More importantly, the trained model achieves state-of-the-art few-shot performance on unseen, heterogeneous Web benchmarks that mix structured data with free text, achieving performance comparable to or superior than expert models trained on the same limited data. This showcases a strong capability for generalization and knowledge transfer to complex Web data. Our work presents a viable path toward building general-purpose, probabilistically-sound, and interpretable foundation models for the Web.

To migrate the remarkable successes of Large Language Models (LLMs), the community has made numerous efforts to generalize them to the table reasoning tasks for the widely deployed tabular data. Despite that, in this work, by showing a probing experiment on our proposed StructQA benchmark, we postulate that even the most advanced LLMs (such as GPTs) may still fall short of coping with tabular data. More specifically, the current scheme often simply relies on serializing the tabular data, together with the meta information, then inputting them through the LLMs. We argue that the loss of structural information is the root of this shortcoming. In this work, we further propose TAMO, which bears an ideology to treat the tables as an independent modality integrated with the text tokens. The resulting model in TAMO is a multimodal framework consisting of a hypergraph neural network as the global table encoder seamlessly integrated with the mainstream LLM. Empirical results on various benchmarking datasets, including HiTab, WikiTQ, WikiSQL, FeTaQA, and StructQA, have demonstrated significant improvements on generalization with an average relative gain of **42.65%**.

Leveraging GPUs' high parallelism can significantly improve the real-time computation efficiency of streaming graph processing. However, when a large-scale graph exceeds GPU memory capacity, CPU-GPU cooperative processing often results in substantial and irregular CPU-to-GPU data transfer overhead. This stems from the extensive redundant graph accesses during continuous computation, which can hardly be addressed by existing solutions. In this work, we present Grapin, an out-of-memory GPU streaming graph processing system designed to minimize graph data transfer via two effective techniques for eliminating redundant accesses: (1) Extending advanced incremental processing algorithms to GPUs by converting their heavyweight data dependency processing into GPU-friendly forms, eliminating redundant graph accesses from the computation side; and (2) providing a lightweight yet efficient GPU hot subgraph management framework that finely caches the frequently accessed dynamic subgraphs in a vertex-centric manner. Experimental results demonstrate that Grapin can efficiently process large-scale streaming graphs with billions of edges on a single NVIDIA A5000 GPU. Enabling incremental computation reduces data transfer by 61%, and the integration of GPU hot subgraph reuse further reduces the remaining transfer by 72%, resulting in a total reduction of 89%. Compared with CPU-based solutions, Grapin achieves speedups ranging from 1.8x to 96.9x (17.9x on average).