Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yang Pian

dblp:232/5611 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1196-6743ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Learning and educational technologies · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph
0.512021
RadarMath: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Math Education · AAAI 2021
Learning and educational technologies › educational assessment
automated grading
0.512021
RadarMath: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Math Education · AAAI 2021
Learning and educational technologies
intelligent tutoring systems
0.512021
RadarMath: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Math Education · AAAI 2021
Learning and educational technologies
personalized learning
0.512021
RadarMath: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Math Education · AAAI 2021
Learning and educational technologies › online learning
web-based learning systems
0.412019
CogLearn: A Cognitive Graph-Oriented Online Learning System · ICDE 2019
Learning and educational technologies › student knowledge modeling › knowledge tracing
deep knowledge tracing
0.312018
Prerequisite-Driven Deep Knowledge Tracing · ICDM 2018
Learning and educational technologies › student knowledge modeling
knowledge tracing
0.312018
Prerequisite-Driven Deep Knowledge Tracing · ICDM 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph construction
0.112019
CogLearn: A Cognitive Graph-Oriented Online Learning System · ICDE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

learner knowledge state · 1.0knowledge graph · 1.0automatic grading models · 1.0machine learning · 0.8deep knowledge tracing · 0.3constraint-based modeling · 0.3bayesian knowledge tracing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Leveraging Large Language Models to Enhance the Inner Loops of Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Yang Pian, Yu Lu 0003
AIED (3)1
2021 RadarMath: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Math Education
abstract
We propose and implement a novel intelligent tutoring system, called RadarMath, to support intelligent and personalized learning for math education. The system provides the services including automatic grading and personalized learning guidance. Specifically, two automatic grading models are designed to accomplish the tasks for scoring the text-answer and formula-answer questions respectively. An education-oriented knowledge graph with the individual learner’s knowledge state is used as the key tool for guiding the personalized learning process. The system demonstrates how the relevant AI techniques could be applied in today's intelligent tutoring systems.
Yu Lu 0003, Yang Pian, Penghe Chen, Qinggang Meng, Yunbo Cao
AAAI2
2021 SLP: A Multi-Dimensional and Consecutive Dataset from K-12 Education
Yu Lu 0003, Yang Pian, Ziding Shen, Penghe Chen
ICCE2
2020 A Gamified Solution to the Cold-Start Problem of Intelligent Tutoring System
Yang Pian, Yu Lu 0003, Ig Ibert Bittencourt
AIED (2)1
2019 CogLearn: A Cognitive Graph-Oriented Online Learning System
abstract
We propose and implement a novel online learning system, called CogLearn, to support learner's self-awareness and reflective thinking, which urges a proper form of knowledge representation together with individual learner's cognitive status. We thus design and employ the machine learning techniques to estimate learner's cognitive status and identify educational relations to construct the desired knowledge representation, namely cognitive graph in our system. We further demonstrate the system by presenting two practical services, i.e., learning obstacle diagnosis and learning path planning, to demonstrate how the constructed cognitive graph effectively and adaptively supports individual system user's learning process.
Yang Pian, Yu Lu 0003, Penghe Chen, Qinglong Duan
ICDE1
2018 Prerequisite-Driven Deep Knowledge Tracing
abstract
Knowledge tracing serves as the key technique in the computer supported education environment (e.g., intelligent tutoring systems) to model student's knowledge states. While the Bayesian knowledge tracing and deep knowledge tracing models have been developed, the sparseness of student's exercise data still limits knowledge tracing's performance and applications. In order to address this issue, we advocate for and propose to incorporate the knowledge structure information, especially the prerequisite relations between pedagogical concepts, into the knowledge tracing model. Specifically, by considering how students master pedagogical concepts and their prerequisites, we model prerequisite concept pairs as ordering pairs. With a proper mathematical formulation, this property can be utilized as constraints in designing knowledge tracing model. As a result, the obtained model can have a better performance on student concept mastery prediction. In order to evaluate this model, we test it on five different real world datasets, and the experimental results show that the proposed model achieves a significant performance improvement by comparing with three knowledge tracing models.
Penghe Chen, Yu Lu 0003, Vincent Wenchen Zheng, Yang Pian
ICDM4