Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Laura Mercurio
dblp:232/8275
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › biomedical information retrieval
health search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream Consequences · SIGIR 2022 |
Information retrieval › ranking
ranking calibration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream Consequences · SIGIR 2022 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
neural retrieval |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream Consequences · SIGIR 2022 |
Information retrieval › ranking
relevance estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream Consequences · SIGIR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
re-ranking · 0.6none-of-the-above classification · 0.6cutoff prediction · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream ConsequencesabstractGiven a query, neural retrieval models predict point estimates of relevance for each document; however, a significant drawback of relying solely on point estimates is that they contain no indication of the model's confidence in its predictions. Despite this lack of information, downstream methods such as reranking, cutoff prediction, and none-of-the-above classification are still able to learn effective functions to accomplish their respective tasks. Unfortunately, these downstream methods can suffer poor performance when the initial ranking model loses confidence in its score predictions. This becomes increasingly important in high-stakes settings, such as medical searches that can influence health decision making. Kevin Du, Bhaskar Mitra 0001, Laura Mercurio, Navid Rekabsaz, Carsten Eickhoff |
SIGIR | 4 |