Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Laura Mercurio

dblp:232/8275 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › biomedical information retrieval
health search
0.612022
Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream Consequences · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval › ranking
ranking calibration
0.612022
Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream Consequences · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval › retrieval models
neural retrieval
0.212022
Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream Consequences · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval › ranking
relevance estimation
0.212022
Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream Consequences · SIGIR 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

re-ranking · 0.6none-of-the-above classification · 0.6cutoff prediction · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Inconsistent Ranking Assumptions in Medical Search and Their Downstream Consequences
abstract
Given a query, neural retrieval models predict point estimates of relevance for each document; however, a significant drawback of relying solely on point estimates is that they contain no indication of the model's confidence in its predictions. Despite this lack of information, downstream methods such as reranking, cutoff prediction, and none-of-the-above classification are still able to learn effective functions to accomplish their respective tasks. Unfortunately, these downstream methods can suffer poor performance when the initial ranking model loses confidence in its score predictions. This becomes increasingly important in high-stakes settings, such as medical searches that can influence health decision making.
Kevin Du, Bhaskar Mitra 0001, Laura Mercurio, Navid Rekabsaz, Carsten Eickhoff
SIGIR4