EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Setareh Taki
dblp:232/8361
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0478-803XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 74% Approximation and online algorithms · 24% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 2% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division |
3.4 | 6 | 2024 | Improving Approximation Guarantees for Maximin Share · EC 2024 Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation · IJCAI 2023 An improved approximation algorithm for maximin shares · Artif. Intell. 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division › share-based fairness
maximin share |
3.4 | 6 | 2024 | Improving Approximation Guarantees for Maximin Share · EC 2024 Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation · IJCAI 2023 An improved approximation algorithm for maximin shares · Artif. Intell. 2021 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
1.6 | 3 | 2023 | Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation · IJCAI 2023 An improved approximation algorithm for maximin shares · Artif. Intell. 2021 An Improved Approximation Algorithm for Maximin Shares · EC 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
approximation guarantees |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improving Approximation Guarantees for Maximin Share · EC 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division
indivisible goods allocation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation · IJCAI 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
mechanism design |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Indivisible Mixed Manna: On the Computability of MMS+PO Allocations · EC 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
pareto optimality |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Indivisible Mixed Manna: On the Computability of MMS+PO Allocations · EC 2021 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
polynomial-time approximation scheme |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On the PTAS for Maximin Shares in an Indivisible Mixed Manna · AAAI 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division › share-based fairness
maximin share approximation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Improved Approximation Algorithm for Maximin Shares · EC 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ordinal approximation · 0.8multiplicative approximation · 0.8garg-taki algorithm · 0.7PTAS · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Improving Approximation Guarantees for Maximin ShareabstractWe consider fair division of a set of indivisible goods among n agents with additive valuations using the fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). MMS is the most popular share-based notion, in which an agent finds an allocation fair to her if she receives goods worth at least her (1-out-of-n) MMS value. An allocation is called MMS if all agents receive their MMS values. However, since MMS allocations do not always exist [Kurokawa et al., JACM'18], the focus shifted to investigating its ordinal and multiplicative approximations. Hannaneh Akrami, Jugal Garg, Eklavya Sharma, Setareh Taki |
EC | 4 |
| 2023 | Simplification and Improvement of MMS ApproximationabstractWe consider the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among n agents with additive valuations, using the popular fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). Since MMS allocations do not always exist, a series of works provided existence and algorithms for approximate MMS allocations. The Garg-Taki algorithm gives the current best approximation factor of (3/4 + 1/12n). Most of these results are based on complicated analyses, especially those providing better than 2/3 factor. Moreover, since no tight example is known of the Garg-Taki algorithm, it is unclear if this is the best factor of this approach. In this paper, we significantly simplify the analysis of this algorithm and also improve the existence guarantee to a factor of (3/4 + min(1/36, 3/(16n-4))). For small n, this provides a noticeable improvement. Furthermore, we present a tight example of this algorithm, showing that this may be the best factor one can hope for with the current techniques. Hannaneh Akrami, Jugal Garg, Eklavya Sharma, Setareh Taki |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 2021 | On the PTAS for Maximin Shares in an Indivisible Mixed MannaabstractWe study fair allocation of indivisible items, both goods and chores, under the popular fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). The problem is well-studied when there are only goods (or chores), where a PTAS to compute the MMS values of agents is well-known. In contrast, for the mixed manna, a recent result showed that finding even an approximate MMS value of an agent up to any approximation factor in (0,1] is NP-hard for general instances. In this paper, we complement the hardness result by obtaining a PTAS to compute the MMS value when its absolute value is at least 1/p times either the total value of all the goods or total cost of all the chores, for some constant p valued at least 1. Rucha Kulkarni, Ruta Mehta, Setareh Taki |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2021 | Indivisible Mixed Manna: On the Computability of MMS+PO AllocationsabstractNo abstract available. Rucha Kulkarni, Ruta Mehta, Setareh Taki |
EC | 3 |
| 2021 | An improved approximation algorithm for maximin shares
Jugal Garg, Setareh Taki |
Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 2020 | An Improved Approximation Algorithm for Maximin SharesabstractWe study the problem of fair allocation of m indivisible items among n agents with additive valuations using the popular notion of maximin share (MMS) as our measure of fairness. An MMS allocation provides each agent a bundle worth at least her maximin share. While it is known that such an allocation need not exist [5, 7], a series of remarkable work [1-3, 6, 7] provided 2/3 approximation algorithms in which each agent receives a bundle worth at least 2/3 times her maximin share. More recently, [4] showed the existence of 3/4 MMS allocations and a PTAS to find a 3/4 - ε MMS allocation. Most of the previous works utilize intricate algorithms and require agents' approximate MMS values, which are computationally expensive to obtain. Jugal Garg, Setareh Taki |
EC | 2 |