Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Setareh Taki

dblp:232/8361 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0478-803XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
6 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 74% Approximation and online algorithms · 24% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 2%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division
3.462024
Improving Approximation Guarantees for Maximin Share · EC 2024
Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation · IJCAI 2023
An improved approximation algorithm for maximin shares · Artif. Intell. 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division › share-based fairness
maximin share
3.462024
Improving Approximation Guarantees for Maximin Share · EC 2024
Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation · IJCAI 2023
An improved approximation algorithm for maximin shares · Artif. Intell. 2021
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
1.632023
Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation · IJCAI 2023
An improved approximation algorithm for maximin shares · Artif. Intell. 2021
An Improved Approximation Algorithm for Maximin Shares · EC 2020
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
approximation guarantees
0.812024
Improving Approximation Guarantees for Maximin Share · EC 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division
indivisible goods allocation
0.712023
Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation · IJCAI 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
mechanism design
0.512021
Indivisible Mixed Manna: On the Computability of MMS+PO Allocations · EC 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
pareto optimality
0.512021
Indivisible Mixed Manna: On the Computability of MMS+PO Allocations · EC 2021
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation schemes
polynomial-time approximation scheme
0.512021
On the PTAS for Maximin Shares in an Indivisible Mixed Manna · AAAI 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division › share-based fairness
maximin share approximation
0.412020
An Improved Approximation Algorithm for Maximin Shares · EC 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ordinal approximation · 0.8multiplicative approximation · 0.8garg-taki algorithm · 0.7PTAS · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Improving Approximation Guarantees for Maximin Share
abstract
We consider fair division of a set of indivisible goods among n agents with additive valuations using the fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). MMS is the most popular share-based notion, in which an agent finds an allocation fair to her if she receives goods worth at least her (1-out-of-n) MMS value. An allocation is called MMS if all agents receive their MMS values. However, since MMS allocations do not always exist [Kurokawa et al., JACM'18], the focus shifted to investigating its ordinal and multiplicative approximations.
Hannaneh Akrami, Jugal Garg, Eklavya Sharma, Setareh Taki
EC4
2023 Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation
abstract
We consider the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among n agents with additive valuations, using the popular fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). Since MMS allocations do not always exist, a series of works provided existence and algorithms for approximate MMS allocations. The Garg-Taki algorithm gives the current best approximation factor of (3/4 + 1/12n). Most of these results are based on complicated analyses, especially those providing better than 2/3 factor. Moreover, since no tight example is known of the Garg-Taki algorithm, it is unclear if this is the best factor of this approach. In this paper, we significantly simplify the analysis of this algorithm and also improve the existence guarantee to a factor of (3/4 + min(1/36, 3/(16n-4))). For small n, this provides a noticeable improvement. Furthermore, we present a tight example of this algorithm, showing that this may be the best factor one can hope for with the current techniques.
Hannaneh Akrami, Jugal Garg, Eklavya Sharma, Setareh Taki
IJCAI4
2021 On the PTAS for Maximin Shares in an Indivisible Mixed Manna
abstract
We study fair allocation of indivisible items, both goods and chores, under the popular fairness notion of maximin share (MMS). The problem is well-studied when there are only goods (or chores), where a PTAS to compute the MMS values of agents is well-known. In contrast, for the mixed manna, a recent result showed that finding even an approximate MMS value of an agent up to any approximation factor in (0,1] is NP-hard for general instances. In this paper, we complement the hardness result by obtaining a PTAS to compute the MMS value when its absolute value is at least 1/p times either the total value of all the goods or total cost of all the chores, for some constant p valued at least 1.
Rucha Kulkarni, Ruta Mehta, Setareh Taki
AAAI3
2021 Indivisible Mixed Manna: On the Computability of MMS+PO Allocations
abstract
No abstract available.
Rucha Kulkarni, Ruta Mehta, Setareh Taki
EC3
2021 An improved approximation algorithm for maximin shares
Jugal Garg, Setareh Taki
Artif. Intell.2
2020 An Improved Approximation Algorithm for Maximin Shares
abstract
We study the problem of fair allocation of m indivisible items among n agents with additive valuations using the popular notion of maximin share (MMS) as our measure of fairness. An MMS allocation provides each agent a bundle worth at least her maximin share. While it is known that such an allocation need not exist [5, 7], a series of remarkable work [1-3, 6, 7] provided 2/3 approximation algorithms in which each agent receives a bundle worth at least 2/3 times her maximin share. More recently, [4] showed the existence of 3/4 MMS allocations and a PTAS to find a 3/4 - ε MMS allocation. Most of the previous works utilize intricate algorithms and require agents' approximate MMS values, which are computationally expensive to obtain.
Jugal Garg, Setareh Taki
EC2