Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dagmar Stemad

dblp:233/0079 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 44% Motion planning and robot control · 44% Robot manipulation · 13%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › locomotion control
balance control
0.412019
Human-inspired balance model to account for foot-beam interaction mechanics · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
bipedal robot
0.412019
Human-inspired balance model to account for foot-beam interaction mechanics · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

foot-beam interaction model · 0.8double inverted pendulum model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Human-inspired balance model to account for foot-beam interaction mechanics
abstract
The locomotion and balance capabilities of bipedal robots have greatly improved in recent years. However, maintaining balance on difficult terrain still poses a significant challenge. In this paper, we examined how humans maintain mediolateral balance when standing on a narrow beam with bare feet and wearing rigid soles. Our results show that foot-beam interaction dynamics critically influence balancing behavior. Importantly, this suggests that differences in human balancing behavior across different support surfaces may not solely result from changes in their neural control strategy. They may also result from changes in foot-ground interaction. Thus, the altered foot-ground interaction dynamics must be considered to accurately capture changes in the human controller across different support surfaces. A simplified model of foot-beam interaction was added to a double inverted pendulum model for human balancing. This extended model could replicate the change in human behavior across different foot contact conditions (bare feet vs. rigid feet). A better understanding of how humans coordinate whole-body behavior across a range of conditions may inform the development of balance controllers for bipedal robots.
Jongwoo Lee, Meghan E. Huber, Enrico Chiovetto, Martin A. Giese, Dagmar Stemad, Neville Hogan
ICRA5
2018 Robot Controllers Compatible with Human Beam Balancing Behavior
abstract
Standing on a beam is a challenging motor skill that requires the regulation of upright balance and stability. In this paper, we analyzed the behavior of humans balancing on a narrow beam without footwear. The results revealed high anti-correlation between lumped upper- and lower-body angular momentum. Despite differences in gross measures of balance, interlimb coordination was consistent between the novice and expert subjects, suggesting that both performances could be described with the same balance controller. By simulating a double inverted pendulum model utilizing different balancing controllers described in the robotics literature, we identified that the whole behavior observed from humans standing on a beam was best replicated with controllers that predominantly utilized hip actuation.
Jongwoo Lee, Meghan E. Huber, Dagmar Stemad, Neville Hogan
IROS3