EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pulkit Rustagi
dblp:233/0397
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-9749-2401ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 77% Reinforcement learning · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › multi-agent planning
cooperative multi-agent planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating Side Effects in Multi-Agent Systems Using Blame Assignment · ICRA 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Mitigating Side Effects in Multi-Agent Systems Using Blame Assignment · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
decentralized markov decision process · 0.9credit assignment · 0.9blame assignment · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mitigating Side Effects in Multi-Agent Systems Using Blame AssignmentabstractWhen independently trained or designed robots are deployed in a shared environment, their combined actions can lead to unintended negative side effects (NSEs). To ensure safe and efficient operation, robots must optimize task performance while minimizing the penalties associated with NSEs, balancing individual objectives with collective impact. We model the problem of mitigating NSEs in a cooperative multi-agent system as a bi-objective lexicographic decentralized Markov decision process. We assume independence of transitions and rewards with respect to the robots' tasks, but the joint NSE penalty creates a form of dependence in this setting. To improve scalability, the joint NSE penalty is decomposed into individual penalties for each robot using credit assignment, which facilitates decentralized policy computation. We empirically demonstrate, using mobile robots and in simulation, the effectiveness and scalability of our approach in mitigating NSEs. Code: https://tinyurl.com/RECON-NSE-Mitigation Pulkit Rustagi, Sandhya Saisubramanian |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2025 | Multi-Agent Multi-Objective Planning with Contextual Lexicographic Reward Preferences
Pulkit Rustagi |
AAMAS | 1 |
| 2025 | Multi-Objective Planning with Contextual Lexicographic Reward Preferences
Pulkit Rustagi, Yashwanthi Anand, Sandhya Saisubramanian |
AAMAS | 1 |
| 2018 | Recovery Control for Quadrotor UAV Colliding with a PoleabstractSmall quadrotor UAVs are projected to fly increasingly in urban environments for a wide variety of applications such as disaster response, police surveillance, civil infrastructure inspection, and air quality measurement. Micro UAVs can detect and avoid obstacles using onboard cameras; nevertheless, disturbances such as wind gusts, operator error, or failure of onboard vision can still result in dangerous collisions with objects. In the urban setting, the most predominant obstacles are walls and poles. With the aim of developing collision recovery control solutions for quadrotor UAVs, this paper investigates the collision dynamics between a propeller-protected quadrotor UAV and a vertical pole. Simulations provide insight into a quadrotor's post-collision dynamics and experimental trials demonstrate the feasibility of autonomously recovering to stable flight using only inertial onboard sensing in real-time. Gareth Dicker, Inna Sharf, Pulkit Rustagi |
IROS | 3 |