Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qilong Wu 0002

dblp:233/1786-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0699-941XORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 49% Language models and text generation · 19% Learning paradigms · 16%
Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 50% Security and privacy of machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › machine-generated text detection
LLM-generated text detection
0.812024
Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutions · ACL (1) 2024
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › text watermarking
LLM watermarking
0.812024
Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutions · ACL (1) 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
watermark removal attack
0.812024
Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutions · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-objective optimization
0.712023
Revisiting Scalarization in Multi-Task Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.712023
Revisiting Scalarization in Multi-Task Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › multi-objective optimization
pareto front exploration
0.712023
Revisiting Scalarization in Multi-Task Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
scalarization
0.712023
Revisiting Scalarization in Multi-Task Learning: A Theoretical Perspective · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompting · 1.5color-aware substitution · 1.5specialized multi-task optimizer · 0.7linear scalarization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutions
abstract
Watermarking approaches are proposed to identify if text being circulated is human-or large language model-(LLM) generated.The stateof-the-art watermarking strategy of Kirchenbauer et al. (2023a) biases the LLM to generate specific ("green") tokens.However, determining the robustness of this watermarking method under finite (low) edit budgets is an open problem.Additionally, existing attack methods fail to evade detection for longer text segments.We overcome these limitations, and propose Self Color Testing-based Substitution (SCTS), the first "color-aware" attack.SCTS obtains color information by strategically prompting the watermarked LLM and comparing output tokens frequencies.It uses this information to determine token colors, and substitutes green tokens with non-green ones.In our experiments, SCTS successfully evades watermark detection using fewer number of edits than related work.Additionally, we show both theoretically and empirically that SCTS can remove the watermark for arbitrarily long watermarked text.
Qilong Wu 0002, Varun Chandrasekaran
ACL (1)1
2023 Revisiting Scalarization in Multi-Task Learning: A Theoretical Perspective
abstract
Linear scalarization, i.e., combining all loss functions by a weighted sum, has been the default choice in the literature of multi-task learning (MTL) since its inception. In recent years, there is a surge of interest in developing Specialized Multi-Task Optimizers (SMTOs) that treat MTL as a multi-objective optimization problem. However, it remains open whether there is a fundamental advantage of SMTOs over scalarization. In fact, heated debates exist in the community comparing these two types of algorithms, mostly from an empirical perspective. To approach the above question, in this paper, we revisit scalarization from a theoretical perspective. We focus on linear MTL models and study whether scalarization is capable of fully exploring the Pareto front. Our findings reveal that, in contrast to recent works that claimed empirical advantages of scalarization, scalarization is inherently incapable of full exploration, especially for those Pareto optimal solutions that strike the balanced trade-offs between multiple tasks. More concretely, when the model is under-parametrized, we reveal a multi-surface structure of the feasible region and identify necessary and sufficient conditions for full exploration. This leads to the conclusion that scalarization is in general incapable of tracing out the Pareto front. Our theoretical results partially answer the open questions in Xin et al. (2021), and provide a more intuitive explanation on why scalarization fails beyond non-convexity. We additionally perform experiments on a real-world dataset using both scalarization and state-of-the-art SMTOs. The experimental results not only corroborate our theoretical findings, but also unveil the potential of SMTOs in finding balanced solutions, which cannot be achieved by scalarization.
Yuzheng Hu, Ruicheng Xian, Qilong Wu 0002, Qiuling Fan, Lang Yin, Han Zhao 0002
NeurIPS3