Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shijia Hua

dblp:233/4640 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8230-060XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › social computing
crowdsourcing
1.012026
Evolutionary Game Dynamics in Tripartite Crowdsourcing With Incentive Regulation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › incentive mechanism
crowdsourcing incentive design
1.012026
Evolutionary Game Dynamics in Tripartite Crowdsourcing With Incentive Regulation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
evolutionary game theory
1.012026
Evolutionary Game Dynamics in Tripartite Crowdsourcing With Incentive Regulation · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

numerical simulation · 2.0evolutionary game theory · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Adaptive target regulation for multi-agent cooperation in collective-risk dilemmas
Shijia Hua, Linjie Liu, Attila Szolnoki
Expert Syst. Appl.1
2026 Evolutionary dynamics of trust with voluntary participation and group-shared sanctions
Yuyuan Liu, Lichen Wang, Ruqiang Guo, Shijia Hua, Linjie Liu, Liang Zhang 0017, Xiaojie Chen 0003
Expert Syst. Appl.4
2026 Dynamic sanctioning mechanism for cooperative multi-agent systems
Linjie Liu, Lichen Wang, Weiyan Niu, Shijia Hua
Expert Syst. Appl.4
2026 Coevolutionary dynamics of cooperation, risk, and cost in collective risk games
abstract
Addressing both natural and societal challenges requires collective cooperation. Studies on collective-risk social dilemmas have shown that individual decisions are influenced by the perceived risk of collective failure. However, existing feedback-evolving game models often focus on a single feedback mechanism, such as the coupling between cooperation and risk or between cooperation and cost. In many real-world scenarios, however, the level of cooperation, the cost of cooperating, and the collective risk are dynamically interlinked. Here, we present an evolutionary game model that considers the interplay of these three variables. Our analysis shows that the worst-case scenario, characterized by full defection, maximum risk, and the highest cost of cooperation, remains a stable evolutionary attractor. Nevertheless, cooperation can emerge and persist because the system also supports stable equilibria with non-zero cooperation. The system exhibits multistability, meaning that different initial conditions lead to either sustained cooperation or a tragedy of the commons. These findings highlight that initial levels of cooperation, cost, and risk collectively determine whether a population can avert a tragic outcome.
Lichen Wang, Shijia Hua, Yuyuan Liu, Liang Zhang 0017, Linjie Liu, Attila Szolnoki
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2026 Evolutionary Game Dynamics in Tripartite Crowdsourcing With Incentive Regulation
abstract
Crowdsourcing, which decomposes tasks or projects through the internet platform and outsources them to a large number of people, has gained significant academic and industry interest due to its efficiency. Although prior theoretical studies have employed evolutionary game theory to study crowdsourcing systems, existing studies have predominantly focused on the game interactions between crowdsourcing worker and requester, often neglecting the platform as a stakeholder. Here we propose an evolutionary game model for tripartite crowdsourcing, accounting for bounded rationality and potential collusion between platform and crowdsourcing worker, with incentives designed to counteract free-riding and deceptive feedback. Our theoretical results indicate that the system can achieve a desired state where worker is certain to choose to provide high-quality work, platform is certain to implement diligent monitoring, and requester is certain to adopt an integrity strategy. Moreover, when the platform consistently adopts the monitoring strategy, the system exhibits oscillatory dynamics, with the probabilities of the worker providing high-quality work and the requester adopting an integrity strategy fluctuating within a bounded interval. Finally, we present numerical examples to validate our theoretical results.
Zishuai Zhu, Shijia Hua, Linjie Liu, Xiaojie Chen 0003
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2024 Coevolutionary dynamics of population and institutional rewards in public goods games
Shijia Hua, Linjie Liu
Expert Syst. Appl.1