Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Etienne Becht

dblp:233/4900 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-1859-9202ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cell population identification
0.412019
Reverse-engineering flow-cytometry gating strategies for phenotypic labelling and high-performance cell sorting · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cytometry data analysis
0.412019
Reverse-engineering flow-cytometry gating strategies for phenotypic labelling and high-performance cell sorting · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.4random forest · 0.4gating algorithm · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Reverse-engineering flow-cytometry gating strategies for phenotypic labelling and high-performance cell sorting
abstract
Motivation: Recent flow and mass cytometers generate datasets of dimensions 20 to 40 and a million single cells. From these, many tools facilitate the discovery of new cell populations associated with diseases or physiology. These new cell populations require the identification of new gating strategies, but gating strategies become exponentially more difficult to optimize when dimensionality increases. To facilitate this step, we developed Hypergate, an algorithm which given a cell population of interest identifies a gating strategy optimized for high yield and purity. Results: Hypergate achieves higher yield and purity than human experts, Support Vector Machines and Random-Forests on public datasets. We use it to revisit some established gating strategies for the identification of innate lymphoid cells, which identifies concise and efficient strategies that allow gating these cells with fewer parameters but higher yield and purity than the current standards. For phenotypic description, Hypergate's outputs are consistent with fields' knowledge and sparser than those from a competing method. Availability and implementation: Hypergate is implemented in R and available on CRAN. The source code is published at http://github.com/ebecht/hypergate under an Open Source Initiative-compliant licence. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Etienne Becht, Yannick Simoni, Elaine Coustan-Smith, Maximilien Evrard, Lai Guan Ng, Dario Campana, Evan W. Newell
Bioinform.1