Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yiwei Yang 0009

dblp:233/9195-9 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-0136-6465ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 71% Vision and language · 29%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
spurious correlation
1.622025
Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025
Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept Curation · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.912025
Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept Curation · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
group robustness
0.812024
Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept Curation · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift
0.312025
Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations? · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic data generation · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9counterfactual evaluation · 0.9distributionally robust optimization · 0.8concept set curation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Escaping the SpuriVerse: Can Large Vision-Language Models Generalize Beyond Seen Spurious Correlations?
abstract
Spurious correlations occur when models rely on non-essential features that coincidentally co-vary with target labels, leading to incorrect reasoning under distribution shift. We consider spurious correlations in multi-modal Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) pretrained on extensive and diverse datasets without explicit task supervision. We develop a benchmark by sourcing GPT-4o errors on real-world visual-question-answering (VQA) benchmarks, then curating a subset through LVLM-human annotation and synthetic counterfactual evaluation to identify errors caused by spurious correlations. This process yields SpuriVerse, a novel benchmark comprised of 124 distinct types of spurious correlations extracted from real-world datasets, each containing 1 realistic and 10 synthetic VQA samples for a total of 1364 multiple choice questions. We evaluate 15 open and closed-source LVLMs on SpuriVerse, finding that even state-of-the-art closed-source models struggle significantly, achieving at best only 35.0\% accuracy. Fine-tuning on synthetic examples that emphasize the spurious correlation improves performance to 78.4\%, suggesting that training on diverse spurious patterns generalizes to unseen situations: models appear to learn to avoid "shortcuts" and attend to the overall image context.
Yiwei Yang 0009, Chung Peng Lee, Shangbin Feng, Dora Zhao, Bingbing Wen, Anthony Z. Liu, Yulia Tsvetkov, Bill Howe
NeurIPS1
2024 Label-Efficient Group Robustness via Out-of-Distribution Concept Curation
abstract
Deep neural networks are prone to capture correlations between spurious attributes and class labels, leading to low accuracy on some combinations of class labels and spurious attribute values. When a spurious attribute represents a protected class, these low-accuracy groups can manifest discriminatory bias. Existing methods attempting to improve worst-group accuracy assume the training data, validation data, or both are reliably labeled by the spurious attribute. But a model may be perceived to be biased towards a concept that is not represented by pre-existing labels on the training data. In these situations, the spurious attribute must be defined with external information. We propose Concept Correction, a framework that represents a concept as a curated set of images from any source, then labels each training sample by its similarity to the concept set to control spurious correlations. For example, concept sets representing gender can be used to measure and control gender bias even without explicit labels. We demonstrate and evaluate an instance of the framework as Concept DRO, which uses concept sets to estimate group labels, then uses these labels to train with a state of the art distributively robust optimization objective. We show that Concept DRO outperforms existing methods that do not require labels of spurious attributes by up to 33.1 % on three image classification datasets and is competitive with the best methods that assume access to labels. We consider how the size and quality of the concept set influences performance and find that even smaller, manually curated sets of noisy AI-generated images are effective at controlling spurious correlations, suggesting that high-quality, reusable concept sets are easy to create and effective in reducing bias.
Yiwei Yang 0009, Anthony Z. Liu, Robert Wolfe, Aylin Caliskan, Bill Howe
CVPR1
2024 Towards Zero-Shot Annotation of the Built Environment with Vision-Language Models
abstract
Equitable urban transportation applications require high-fidelity digital representations of the built environment (streets, crossings, curb ramps and more). Direct inspections and manual annotations are costly at scale, while conventional machine learning methods require substantial annotated training data for adequate performance. This study explores vision language models as a tool for annotating diverse urban features from satellite images, reducing the dependence on human annotation. Although these models excel at describing common objects in human-centric images, their training sets may lack signals for esoteric built environment features, making their performance uncertain. We demonstrate a proof-of-concept using a vision language model and a visual prompting strategy that considers segmented image elements. Experiments on two urban features --- stop lines and raised tables --- show that while zero-shot prompting rarely works, the segmentation and visual prompting strategies achieve nearly 40% intersection-over-union accuracy. We describe how these results motivate further research in automatic annotation of the built environment to improve equity, accessibility, and safety at scale and in diverse environments.
Bin Han 0011, Yiwei Yang 0009, Anat Caspi, Bill Howe
SIGSPATIAL/GIS2