Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jaehui Hwang

dblp:234/1038 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0003-7785-6886ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 70% Generative modeling · 13% Video understanding and tracking · 9%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
1.322024
Similarity of Neural Architectures Using Adversarial Attack Transferability · ECCV (68) 2024
Just One Moment: Structural Vulnerability of Deep Action Recognition against One Frame Attack · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial transferability
0.812024
Similarity of Neural Architectures Using Adversarial Attack Transferability · ECCV (68) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial vulnerability
0.812024
Anomaly Score: Evaluating Generative Models and Individual Generated Images Based on Complexity and Vulnerability · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model evaluation
0.812024
Anomaly Score: Evaluating Generative Models and Individual Generated Images Based on Complexity and Vulnerability · CVPR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Anomaly Score: Evaluating Generative Models and Individual Generated Images Based on Complexity and Vulnerability · CVPR 2024
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.512021
Just One Moment: Structural Vulnerability of Deep Action Recognition against One Frame Attack · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack
0.512021
Just One Moment: Structural Vulnerability of Deep Action Recognition against One Frame Attack · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation space analysis
0.212024
Anomaly Score: Evaluating Generative Models and Individual Generated Images Based on Complexity and Vulnerability · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adversarial perturbation · 1.3feature embedding · 0.8adversarial attack transferability · 0.8universal perturbation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Anomaly Score: Evaluating Generative Models and Individual Generated Images Based on Complexity and Vulnerability
abstract
With the advancement of generative models, the assessment of generated images becomes increasingly more important. Previous methods measure distances between features of reference and generated images from trained vision models. In this paper, we conduct an extensive investigation into the relationship between the representation space and input space around generated images. We first propose two measures related to the presence of unnatural elements within images: complexity, which indicates how nonlinear the representation space is, and vulnerability, which is related to how easily the extracted feature changes by adversarial input changes. Based on these, we introduce a new metric to evaluating image-generative models called anomaly score (AS). Moreover, we propose AS-i (anomaly score for individual images) that can effectively evaluate generated images individually. Experimental results demonstrate the validity of the proposed approach.
Jaehui Hwang, Junghyuk Lee, Jong-Seok Lee
CVPR1
2024 Similarity of Neural Architectures Using Adversarial Attack Transferability
Jaehui Hwang, Dongyoon Han, Byeongho Heo, Song Park, Sanghyuk Chun, Jong-Seok Lee
ECCV (68)1
2024 Temporal shuffling for defending deep action recognition models against adversarial attacks
Jaehui Hwang, Huan Zhang 0001, Jun-Ho Choi, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Jong-Seok Lee
Neural Networks1
2021 Just One Moment: Structural Vulnerability of Deep Action Recognition against One Frame Attack
abstract
The video-based action recognition task has been extensively studied in recent years. In this paper, we study the structural vulnerability of deep learning-based action recognition models against the adversarial attack using the one frame attack that adds an inconspicuous perturbation to only a single frame of a given video clip. Our analysis shows that the models are highly vulnerable against the one frame attack due to their structural properties. Experiments demonstrate high fooling rates and inconspicuous characteristics of the attack. Furthermore, we show that strong universal one frame perturbations can be obtained under various scenarios. Our work raises the serious issue of adversarial vulnerability of the state-of-the-art action recognition models in various perspectives.
Jaehui Hwang, Jun-Hyuk Kim, Jun-Ho Choi, Jong-Seok Lee
ICCV1
2018 On the Repeatability of EEG-Based Image Quality Assessment
abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) has attracted much attention because it allows to monitor user states in real time and is applicable to applications for improvement of multimedia user experience. The repeatability of EEG-based perceptual response analysis is critical for the reliability of such applications, which has not been sufficiently addressed in previous studies. In this paper, we evaluate the repeatability of EEG-based image quality assessment. We repeatedly perform the same experiment for three successive days. Then, we design a classification system that discriminates the quality of images based on EEG, whose performance is examined across the data collected in different days. We reveal that the repeatability of image quality evaluation using EEG decreases as time goes and the memory effect intensifies the loss of repeatability.
Jaehui Hwang, Seong-Eun Moon, Jong-Seok Lee
SMC1