Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nianqiao Ju

dblp:234/6896 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8861-4087ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 67% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular epidemiology
0.812024
SNP-slice resolves mixed infections: simultaneously unveiling strain haplotypes and linking them to hosts · Bioinform. 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.612022
Data Augmentation MCMC for Bayesian Inference from Privatized Data · NeurIPS 2022
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.612022
Data Augmentation MCMC for Bayesian Inference from Privatized Data · NeurIPS 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit
0.412019
A Sequential Test for Selecting the Better Variant: Online A/B testing, Adaptive Allocation, and Continuous Monitoring · WSDM 2019
Information theory › statistical inference
sequential analysis
0.412019
A Sequential Test for Selecting the Better Variant: Online A/B testing, Adaptive Allocation, and Continuous Monitoring · WSDM 2019
Information theory › hypothesis testing
sequential hypothesis testing
0.412019
A Sequential Test for Selecting the Better Variant: Online A/B testing, Adaptive Allocation, and Continuous Monitoring · WSDM 2019
Empirical software engineering › controlled experiment › online controlled experiments
a/b testing
0.112019
A Sequential Test for Selecting the Better Variant: Online A/B testing, Adaptive Allocation, and Continuous Monitoring · WSDM 2019
Empirical software engineering › controlled experiment
online controlled experiments
0.112019
A Sequential Test for Selecting the Better Variant: Online A/B testing, Adaptive Allocation, and Continuous Monitoring · WSDM 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data augmentation · 1.1MCMC · 1.1thompson sampling · 0.8slice sampling · 0.8sequential girshick test · 0.8markov chain monte carlo · 0.8imputation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 SNP-slice resolves mixed infections: simultaneously unveiling strain haplotypes and linking them to hosts
abstract
MOTIVATION: Multi-strain infection is a common yet under-investigated phenomenon of many pathogens. Currently, biologists analyzing SNP information sometimes have to discard mixed infection samples as many downstream analyses require monogenomic inputs. Such a protocol impedes our understanding of the underlying genetic diversity, co-infection patterns, and genomic relatedness of pathogens. A scalable tool to learn and resolve the SNP-haplotypes from polygenomic data is an urgent need in molecular epidemiology. RESULTS: We develop a slice sampling Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, named SNP-Slice, to learn not only the SNP-haplotypes of all strains in the populations but also which strains infect which hosts. Our method reconstructs SNP-haplotypes and individual heterozygosities accurately without reference panels and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods at estimating the multiplicity of infections and allele frequencies. Thus, SNP-Slice introduces a novel approach to address polygenomic data and opens a new avenue for resolving complex infection patterns in molecular surveillance. We illustrate the performance of SNP-Slice on empirical malaria and HIV datasets and provide recommendations for using our method on empirical datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The implementation of the SNP-Slice algorithm, as well as scripts to analyze SNP-Slice outputs, are available at https://github.com/nianqiaoju/snp-slice.
Nianqiao Ju, Qixin He
Bioinform.1
2022 Data Augmentation MCMC for Bayesian Inference from Privatized Data
abstract
Differentially private mechanisms protect privacy by introducing additional randomness into the data. Restricting access to only the privatized data makes it challenging to perform valid statistical inference on parameters underlying the confidential data. Specifically, the likelihood function of the privatized data requires integrating over the large space of confidential databases and is typically intractable. For Bayesian analysis, this results in a posterior distribution that is doubly intractable, rendering traditional MCMC techniques inapplicable. We propose an MCMC framework to perform Bayesian inference from the privatized data, which is applicable to a wide range of statistical models and privacy mechanisms. Our MCMC algorithm augments the model parameters with the unobserved confidential data, and alternately updates each one. For the potentially challenging step of updating the confidential data, we propose a generic approach that exploits the privacy guarantee of the mechanism to ensure efficiency. We give results on the computational complexity, acceptance rate, and mixing properties of our MCMC. We illustrate the efficacy and applicability of our methods on a naïve-Bayes log-linear model and on a linear regression model.
Nianqiao Ju, Jordan Awan, Ruobin Gong, Vinayak Rao
NeurIPS1
2019 A Sequential Test for Selecting the Better Variant: Online A/B testing, Adaptive Allocation, and Continuous Monitoring
abstract
Online A/B tests play an instrumental role for Internet companies to improve products and technologies in a data-driven manner. An online A/B test, in its most straightforward form, can be treated as a static hypothesis test where traditional statistical tools such as p-values and power analysis might be applied to help decision makers determine which variant performs better. However, a static A/B test presents both time cost and the opportunity cost for rapid product iterations. For time cost, a fast-paced product evolution pushes its shareholders to consistently monitor results from online A/B experiments, which usually invites peeking and altering experimental designs as data collected. It is recognized that this flexibility might harm statistical guarantees if not introduced in the right way, especially when online tests are considered as static hypothesis tests. For opportunity cost, a static test usually entails a static allocation of users into different variants, which prevents an immediate roll-out of the better version to larger audience or risks of alienating users who may suffer from a bad experience. While some works try to tackle these challenges, no prior method focuses on a holistic solution to both issues. In this paper, we propose a unified framework utilizing sequential analysis and multi-armed bandit to address time cost and the opportunity cost of static online tests simultaneously. In particular, we present an imputed sequential Girshick test that accommodates online data and dynamic allocation of data. The unobserved potential outcomes are treated as missing data and are imputed using empirical averages. Focusing on the binomial model, we demonstrate that the proposed imputed Girshick test achieves Type-I error and power control with both a fixed allocation ratio and an adaptive allocation such as Thompson Sampling through extensive experiments. In addition, we also run experiments on historical Etsy.com A/B tests to show the reduction in opportunity cost when using the proposed method.
Nianqiao Ju, Diane Hu, Adam Henderson, Liangjie Hong
WSDM1