Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guangju Wang
dblp:234/7567
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 54% Language models and text generation · 46% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 25% High-performance computing · 25% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › large-scale reinforcement learning
distributed reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SRL: Scaling Distributed Reinforcement Learning to Over Ten Thousand Cores · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study · ICML 2024 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SRL: Scaling Distributed Reinforcement Learning to Over Ten Thousand Cores · ICLR 2024 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SRL: Scaling Distributed Reinforcement Learning to Over Ten Thousand Cores · ICLR 2024 |
High-performance computing › large-scale training
large-scale distributed training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SRL: Scaling Distributed Reinforcement Learning to Over Ten Thousand Cores · ICLR 2024 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel machine learning
parallel training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SRL: Scaling Distributed Reinforcement Learning to Over Ten Thousand Cores · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dataflow abstraction · 1.5reward modeling · 0.8proximal policy optimization · 0.8direct preference optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SRL: Scaling Distributed Reinforcement Learning to Over Ten Thousand CoresabstractThe ever-growing complexity of reinforcement learning (RL) tasks demands a distributed system to efficiently generate and process a massive amount of data. However, existing open-source libraries suffer from various limitations, which impede their practical use in challenging scenarios where large-scale training is necessary. In this paper, we present a novel abstraction on the dataflows of RL
training, which unifies diverse RL training applications into a general framework. Following this abstraction, we develop a scalable, efficient, and extensible distributed RL system called ReaLly Scalable RL (SRL), which allows efficient and massively parallelized training and easy development of customized algorithms. Our evaluation shows that SRL outperforms existing academic libraries, reaching at most 21x higher training throughput in a distributed setting. On learning performance, beyond performing and scaling well on common RL benchmarks with different RL algorithms, SRL can reproduce the same solution in the challenging hide-and-seek environment as reported by OpenAI with up to 5x speedup in wallclock time. Notably, SRL is the first in the academic community to perform RL experiments at a large scale with over 15k CPU cores. SRL anonymous repository is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/srl-1E45/. Zhiyu Mei, Jiaxuan Gao, Guangju Wang, Huanchen Zhang, Yi Wu 0013 |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2024 | Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive StudyabstractReinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is currently the most widely used method to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Existing RLHF methods can be roughly categorized as either reward-based or reward-free. Novel applications such as ChatGPT and Claude leverage reward-based methods that first learn a reward model and apply actor-critic algorithms, such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). However, in academic benchmarks, state-of-the-art results are often achieved via reward-free methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Is DPO truly superior to PPO? Why does PPO perform poorly on these benchmarks? In this paper, we first conduct both theoretical and empirical studies on the algorithmic properties of DPO and show that DPO may have fundamental limitations. Moreover, we also comprehensively examine PPO and reveal the key factors for the best performances of PPO in fine-tuning LLMs. Finally, we benchmark DPO and PPO across a collection of RLHF testbeds, ranging from dialogue to code generation. Experiment results demonstrate that PPO is able to surpass other alignment methods in all cases and achieve state-of-the-art results in challenging code competitions. Shusheng Xu, Jiaxuan Gao, Zhiyu Mei, Guangju Wang, Chao Yu 0005, Yi Wu 0013 |
ICML | 7 |
| 2021 | Consensus mechanism design based on structured directed acyclic graphsabstractCapacity limit is a bottleneck for broader applications of blockchain systems. Scaling up capacity while preserving security and decentralization are major challenges in blockchain infrastructure design. In this paper, we design a proof of work-based mechanism by endowing directed acyclic graphs (DAG) with a novel structure so that peers can reach consensus at a large scale. At a high level, we break large blocks into smaller ones to improve utilization of broadcast network and embed a Nakamoto chain inside the DAG in a decent way to ensure security. We further exploit the DAG structure and design a mempool transaction assignment method. The method reduces the probability that a transaction is processed by multiple miners and hence improves processing efficiency. Without sacrificing security and decentralization, our design significant scales up capacity and also addresses important issues such as high latency and mining power concentration in existing blockchain systems. Guangju Wang, Guangyuan Zhang, Jiheng Zhang |
Blockchain Res. Appl. | 2 |