Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonathan M. Bloom

dblp:234/8469 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 53% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Reinforcement learning · 17%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically plausible learning
0.412020
Two Routes to Scalable Credit Assignment without Weight Symmetry · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
credit assignment
0.412020
Two Routes to Scalable Credit Assignment without Weight Symmetry · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training › local learning
local learning rule
0.412020
Two Routes to Scalable Credit Assignment without Weight Symmetry · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
0.412019
Loss Landscapes of Regularized Linear Autoencoders · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
linear autoencoder
0.412019
Loss Landscapes of Regularized Linear Autoencoders · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis
0.412019
Loss Landscapes of Regularized Linear Autoencoders · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape
0.112019
Loss Landscapes of Regularized Linear Autoencoders · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feedback alignment · 0.4backpropagation · 0.4singular value decomposition · 0.4probabilistic PCA · 0.4l2 regularization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Two Routes to Scalable Credit Assignment without Weight Symmetry
abstract
The neural plausibility of backpropagation has long been disputed, primarily for its use of non-local weight transport — the biologically dubious requirement that one neuron instantaneously measure the synaptic weights of another. Until recently, attempts to create local learning rules that avoid weight transport have typically failed in the large-scale learning scenarios where backpropagation shines, e.g. ImageNet categorization with deep convolutional networks. Here, we investigate a recently proposed local learning rule that yields competitive performance with backpropagation and find that it is highly sensitive to metaparameter choices, requiring laborious tuning that does not transfer across network architecture. Our analysis indicates the underlying mathematical reason for this instability, allowing us to identify a more robust local learning rule that better transfers without metaparameter tuning. Nonetheless, we find a performance and stability gap between this local rule and backpropagation that widens with increasing model depth. We then investigate several non-local learning rules that relax the need for instantaneous weight transport into a more biologically-plausible "weight estimation" process, showing that these rules match state-of-the-art performance on deep networks and operate effectively in the presence of noisy updates. Taken together, our results suggest two routes towards the discovery of neural implementations for credit assignment without weight symmetry: further improvement of local rules so that they perform consistently across architectures and the identification of biological implementations for non-local learning mechanisms.
Daniel Kunin, Aran Nayebi, Javier Sagastuy-Breña, Surya Ganguli, Jonathan M. Bloom, Dan Yamins
ICML5
2019 Loss Landscapes of Regularized Linear Autoencoders
abstract
Autoencoders are a deep learning model for representation learning. When trained to minimize the distance between the data and its reconstruction, linear autoencoders (LAEs) learn the subspace spanned by the top principal directions but cannot learn the principal directions themselves. In this paper, we prove that $L_2$-regularized LAEs are symmetric at all critical points and learn the principal directions as the left singular vectors of the decoder. We smoothly parameterize the critical manifold and relate the minima to the MAP estimate of probabilistic PCA. We illustrate these results empirically and consider implications for PCA algorithms, computational neuroscience, and the algebraic topology of learning.
Daniel Kunin, Jonathan M. Bloom, Aleksandrina Goeva, Cotton Seed
ICML2