Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniil Gavrilov

dblp:234/8563 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 8 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Language models and text generation · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Efficient and distributed learning · 17%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
2.632025
Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language Models · ICML 2025
Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across Layers · ICLR 2025
Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
1.722025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Steering LLM Reasoning Through Bias-Only Adaptation · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.922024
Linear Transformers with Learnable Kernel Functions are Better In-Context Models · ACL (1) 2024
PALBERT: Teaching ALBERT to Ponder · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
0.912025
Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across Layers · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
model steering
0.912025
Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language Models · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
offline alignment
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder
0.912025
Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparsity
0.912025
Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.812024
Linear Transformers with Learnable Kernel Functions are Better In-Context Models · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer › efficient transformer
linear transformer
0.812024
Linear Transformers with Learnable Kernel Functions are Better In-Context Models · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
adaptive computation
0.612022
PALBERT: Teaching ALBERT to Ponder · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
early exit
0.612022
PALBERT: Teaching ALBERT to Ponder · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
pre-trained language model inference
0.612022
PALBERT: Teaching ALBERT to Ponder · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
reward overoptimization
0.312025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse autoencoder · 2.6trust region · 0.9parameter-efficient fine-tuning · 0.9feature matching · 0.9cosine similarity · 0.9bias-only adaptation · 0.9KTO · 0.9IPO · 0.9DPO · 0.9learnable kernel functions · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy
abstract
Nikita Balagansky, Yaroslav Aksenov, Daniil Laptev, Vadim Kurochkin, Gleb Gerasimov, Nikita Koriagin, Daniil Gavrilov. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Nikita Balagansky, Yaroslav Aksenov, Daniil Laptev, Vadim Kurochkin, Gleb Gerasimov, Nikita Koriagin, Daniil Gavrilov
EMNLP7
2025 Steering LLM Reasoning Through Bias-Only Adaptation
abstract
Viacheslav Sinii, Alexey Gorbatovski, Artem Cherepanov, Boris Shaposhnikov, Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Viacheslav Sinii, Alexey Gorbatovski, Artem Cherepanov, Boris Shaposhnikov, Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov
EMNLP6
2025 Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across Layers
abstract
Understanding how features evolve across layers in deep neural networks is a fundamental challenge in mechanistic interpretability, particularly due to polysemanticity and feature superposition. While Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have been used to extract interpretable features from individual layers, aligning these features across layers has remained an open problem. In this paper, we introduce SAE Match, a novel, data-free method for aligning SAE features across different layers of a neural network. Our approach involves matching features by minimizing the mean squared error between the folded parameters of SAEs, a technique that incorporates activation thresholds into the encoder and decoder weights to account for differences in feature scales. Through extensive experiments on the Gemma 2 language model, we demonstrate that our method effectively captures feature evolution across layers, improving feature matching quality. We also show that features persist over several layers and that our approach can approximate hidden states across layers. Our work advances the understanding of feature dynamics in neural networks and provides a new tool for mechanistic interpretability studies.
Nikita Balagansky, Ian Maksimov, Daniil Gavrilov
ICLR3
2025 Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment
abstract
Despite the fact that offline methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment do not require a direct reward model, they remain susceptible to overoptimization. This issue arises when the trained model deviates excessively from the reference policy, leading to a decrease in sample quality. We propose a novel approach of offline alignment methods, called Trust Region (including variants TR-DPO, TR-IPO, TR-KTO), which dynamically updates the reference policy throughout the training process. Our results show that TR alignment methods effectively mitigate overoptimization, enabling models to maintain strong performance even when substantially deviating from the initial reference policy. We demonstrate the efficacy of these approaches not only through toy examples that exhibit reduced overoptimization, but also through direct, side-by-side comparisons in specific tasks such as helpful and harmless dialogue, as well as summarization, where they surpass conventional methods. Additionally, we report significant improvements in general-purpose assistant setups with the Llama3 model on the AlpacaEval 2 and Arena-Hard benchmarks, highlighting the advantages of Trust Region methods over classical approaches.
Alexey Gorbatovski, Boris Shaposhnikov, Alexey Malakhov, Nikita Surnachev, Yaroslav Aksenov, Ian Maksimov, Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov
ICLR8
2025 Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language Models
abstract
We introduce a new approach to systematically map features discovered by sparse autoencoder across consecutive layers of large language models, extending earlier work that examined inter-layer feature links. By using a data-free cosine similarity technique, we trace how specific features persist, transform, or first appear at each stage. This method yields granular flow graphs of feature evolution, enabling fine-grained interpretability and mechanistic insights into model computations. Crucially, we demonstrate how these cross-layer feature maps facilitate direct steering of model behavior by amplifying or suppressing chosen features, achieving targeted thematic control in text generation. Together, our findings highlight the utility of a causal, cross-layer interpretability framework that not only clarifies how features develop through forward passes but also provides new means for transparent manipulation of large language models.
Daniil Laptev, Nikita Balagansky, Yaroslav Aksenov, Daniil Gavrilov
ICML4
2024 Linear Transformers with Learnable Kernel Functions are Better In-Context Models
abstract
Yaroslav Aksenov, Nikita Balagansky, Sofia Lo Cicero Vaina, Boris Shaposhnikov, Alexey Gorbatovski, Daniil Gavrilov. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Yaroslav Aksenov, Nikita Balagansky, Sofia Maria Lo Cicero Vaina, Boris Shaposhnikov, Alexey Gorbatovski, Daniil Gavrilov
ACL (1)6
2022 PALBERT: Teaching ALBERT to Ponder
abstract
Currently, pre-trained models can be considered the default choice for a wide range of NLP tasks. Despite their SoTA results, there is practical evidence that these models may require a different number of computing layers for different input sequences, since evaluating all layers leads to overconfidence in wrong predictions (namely overthinking). This problem can potentially be solved by implementing adaptive computation time approaches, which were first designed to improve inference speed. Recently proposed PonderNet may be a promising solution for performing an early exit by treating the exit layer's index as a latent variable. However, the originally proposed exit criterion, relying on sampling from trained posterior distribution on the probability of exiting from the $i$-th layer, introduces major variance in exit layer indices, significantly reducing the resulting model's performance. In this paper, we propose improving PonderNet with a novel deterministic Q-exit criterion and a revisited model architecture. We adapted the proposed mechanism to ALBERT and RoBERTa and compared it with recent methods for performing an early exit. We observed that the proposed changes can be considered significant improvements on the original PonderNet architecture and outperform PABEE on a wide range of GLUE tasks. In addition, we also performed an in-depth ablation study of the proposed architecture to further understand Lambda layers and their performance.
Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov
NeurIPS2
2021 Implicit Unlikelihood Training: Improving Neural Text Generation with Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Likelihood training and maximization-based decoding result in dull and repetitive generated texts even when using powerful language models (Holtzman et al., 2019).Adding a loss function for regularization was shown to improve text generation output by helping avoid unwanted properties, such as contradiction or repetition (Li et al., 2020).In this work, we propose fine-tuning a language model by using policy gradient reinforcement learning, directly optimizing for better generation.We apply this approach to minimizing repetition in generated text, and show that, when combined with unlikelihood training (Welleck et al., 2020), our method further reduces repetition without impacting the language model quality.We also evaluate other methods for improving generation at training and decoding time, and compare them using various metrics aimed at control for better text generation output.
Evgeny Lagutin, Daniil Gavrilov, Pavel Kalaidin
EACL2
2019 Self-attentive Model for Headline Generation
Daniil Gavrilov, Pavel Kalaidin, Valentin Malykh
ECIR (2)1