Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Niv Giladi

dblp:234/8654 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 34% Optimization for machine learning · 16%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Parallel and multicore computing · 84% Distributed systems · 16%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 77% Environmental and earth informatics · 23%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › large model training
distributed training of large language models
0.912025
Tensor-Parallelism with Partially Synchronized Activations · NeurIPS 2025
Parallel and multicore computing › distributed deep learning training
tensor parallelism
0.912025
Tensor-Parallelism with Partially Synchronized Activations · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.712023
DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
straggler mitigation
0.712023
DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network
0.512021
Physics-Aware Downsampling with Deep Learning for Scalable Flood Modeling · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
asynchronous training
0.412020
At Stability's Edge: How to Adjust Hyperparameters to Preserve Minima Selection in Asynchronous Training of Neural Networks? · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.412020
Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition · CVPR 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.412020
At Stability's Edge: How to Adjust Hyperparameters to Preserve Minima Selection in Asynchronous Training of Neural Networks? · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
large-batch training
0.412020
Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition · CVPR 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.412020
Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition · CVPR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
training regularization
0.412020
Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition · CVPR 2020
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed synchronization
0.212023
DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and runtimes
0.212023
DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023
Environmental and earth informatics › hydrology
flood forecasting
0.112021
Physics-Aware Downsampling with Deep Learning for Scalable Flood Modeling · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tensor parallelism · 1.7partial activation synchronization · 1.7variance reduction · 1.3allreduce · 1.3partial differential equation simulation · 1.0deep neural network · 1.0data augmentation · 0.4batch augmentation · 0.4asynchronous training · 0.4SGD · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Tensor-Parallelism with Partially Synchronized Activations
abstract
Training and inference of Large Language Models (LLMs) with tensor-parallelism requires substantial communication to synchronize activations. Our findings suggest that with a few minor adjustments to current practices, LLMs can be trained without fully synchronizing activations, reducing bandwidth demands. We name this “Communication-Aware Architecture for Tensor-parallelism” (CAAT-Net). We train a 7B parameter CAAT-Net model and show that tensor-parallel communication can be reduced by up to 50% with no significant drop in pretraining accuracy across nearly all evaluated benchmarks. We also experiment with smaller 130M and 1.1B models to show the robustness and scalability of our method. We find that, in some scenarios, validation loss can even improve when reducing communication. Finally, we demonstrate how CAAT-Net accelerates both training and inference workloads across various settings and model sizes.
Itay Lamprecht, Asaf Karnieli, Yair Hanani, Niv Giladi, Daniel Soudry
NeurIPS4
2023 DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction
abstract
Background: Distributed training is essential for large scale training of deep neural networks (DNNs). The dominant methods for large scale DNN training are synchronous (e.g. All-Reduce), but these require waiting for all workers in each step. Thus, these methods are limited by the delays caused by straggling workers. Results: We study a typical scenario in which workers are straggling due to variability in compute time. We find an analytical relation between compute time properties and scalability limitations, caused by such straggling workers. With these findings, we propose a simple yet effective decentralized method to reduce the variation among workers and thus improve the robustness of synchronous training. This method can be integrated with the widely used All-Reduce. Our findings are validated on large-scale training tasks using 200 Gaudi Accelerators.
Niv Giladi, Shahar Gottlieb, Moran Shkolnik, Asaf Karnieli, Ron Banner, Elad Hoffer, Kfir Y. Levy, Daniel Soudry
NeurIPS1
2021 Physics-Aware Downsampling with Deep Learning for Scalable Flood Modeling
abstract
Background. Floods are the most common natural disaster in the world, affecting the lives of hundreds of millions. Flood forecasting is therefore a vitally important endeavor, typically achieved using physical water flow simulations, which rely on accurate terrain elevation maps. However, such simulations, based on solving partial differential equations, are computationally prohibitive on a large scale. This scalability issue is commonly alleviated using a coarse grid representation of the elevation map, though this representation may distort crucial terrain details, leading to significant inaccuracies in the simulation.\Contributions. We train a deep neural network to perform physics-informed downsampling of the terrain map: we optimize the coarse grid representation of the terrain maps, so that the flood prediction will match the fine grid solution. For the learning process to succeed, we configure a dataset specifically for this task. We demonstrate that with this method, it is possible to achieve a significant reduction in computational cost, while maintaining an accurate solution. A reference implementation accompanies the paper as well as documentation and code for dataset reproduction.
Niv Giladi, Zvika Ben-Haim, Sella Nevo, Yossi Matias, Daniel Soudry
NeurIPS1
2020 Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition
abstract
Large-batch SGD is important for scaling training of deep neural networks. However, without fine-tuning hyperparameter schedules, the generalization of the model may be hampered. We propose to use batch augmentation: replicating instances of samples within the same batch with different data augmentations. Batch augmentation acts as a regularizer and an accelerator, increasing both generalization and performance scaling for a fixed budget of optimization steps. We analyze the effect of batch augmentation on gradient variance and show that it empirically improves convergence for a wide variety of networks and datasets. Our results show that batch augmentation reduces the number of necessary SGD updates to achieve the same accuracy as the state-of-the-art. Overall, this simple yet effective method enables faster training and better generalization by allowing more computational resources to be used concurrently.
Elad Hoffer, Tal Ben-Nun, Itay Hubara, Niv Giladi, Torsten Hoefler, Daniel Soudry
CVPR4
2020 At Stability's Edge: How to Adjust Hyperparameters to Preserve Minima Selection in Asynchronous Training of Neural Networks?
Niv Giladi, Mor Shpigel Nacson, Elad Hoffer, Daniel Soudry
ICLR1