Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Niv Giladi
dblp:234/8654
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 34% Optimization for machine learning · 16% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Parallel and multicore computing · 84% Distributed systems · 16% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 77% Environmental and earth informatics · 23% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › large model training
distributed training of large language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tensor-Parallelism with Partially Synchronized Activations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Parallel and multicore computing › distributed deep learning training
tensor parallelism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tensor-Parallelism with Partially Synchronized Activations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
straggler mitigation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Physics-Aware Downsampling with Deep Learning for Scalable Flood Modeling · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
asynchronous training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | At Stability's Edge: How to Adjust Hyperparameters to Preserve Minima Selection in Asynchronous Training of Neural Networks? · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | At Stability's Edge: How to Adjust Hyperparameters to Preserve Minima Selection in Asynchronous Training of Neural Networks? · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
large-batch training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
training regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance Repetition · CVPR 2020 |
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed synchronization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and runtimes |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Environmental and earth informatics › hydrology
flood forecasting |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Physics-Aware Downsampling with Deep Learning for Scalable Flood Modeling · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tensor parallelism · 1.7partial activation synchronization · 1.7variance reduction · 1.3allreduce · 1.3partial differential equation simulation · 1.0deep neural network · 1.0data augmentation · 0.4batch augmentation · 0.4asynchronous training · 0.4SGD · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Tensor-Parallelism with Partially Synchronized ActivationsabstractTraining and inference of Large Language Models (LLMs) with tensor-parallelism requires substantial communication to synchronize activations. Our findings suggest that with a few minor adjustments to current practices, LLMs can be trained without fully synchronizing activations, reducing bandwidth demands. We name this “Communication-Aware Architecture for Tensor-parallelism” (CAAT-Net). We train a 7B parameter CAAT-Net model and show that tensor-parallel communication can be reduced by up to 50% with no significant drop in pretraining accuracy across nearly all evaluated benchmarks. We also experiment with smaller 130M and 1.1B models to show the robustness and scalability of our method. We find that, in some scenarios, validation loss can even improve when reducing communication. Finally, we demonstrate how CAAT-Net accelerates both training and inference workloads across various settings and model sizes. Itay Lamprecht, Asaf Karnieli, Yair Hanani, Niv Giladi, Daniel Soudry |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reductionabstractBackground: Distributed training is essential for large scale training of deep neural networks (DNNs). The dominant methods for large scale DNN training are synchronous (e.g. All-Reduce), but these require waiting for all workers in each step. Thus, these methods are limited by the delays caused by straggling workers.
Results: We study a typical scenario in which workers are straggling due to variability in compute time. We find an analytical relation between compute time properties and scalability limitations, caused by such straggling workers. With these findings, we propose a simple yet effective decentralized method to reduce the variation among workers and thus improve the robustness of synchronous training. This method can be integrated with the widely used All-Reduce. Our findings are validated on large-scale training tasks using 200 Gaudi Accelerators. Niv Giladi, Shahar Gottlieb, Moran Shkolnik, Asaf Karnieli, Ron Banner, Elad Hoffer, Kfir Y. Levy, Daniel Soudry |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Physics-Aware Downsampling with Deep Learning for Scalable Flood ModelingabstractBackground. Floods are the most common natural disaster in the world, affecting the lives of hundreds of millions. Flood forecasting is therefore a vitally important endeavor, typically achieved using physical water flow simulations, which rely on accurate terrain elevation maps. However, such simulations, based on solving partial differential equations, are computationally prohibitive on a large scale. This scalability issue is commonly alleviated using a coarse grid representation of the elevation map, though this representation may distort crucial terrain details, leading to significant inaccuracies in the simulation.\Contributions. We train a deep neural network to perform physics-informed downsampling of the terrain map: we optimize the coarse grid representation of the terrain maps, so that the flood prediction will match the fine grid solution. For the learning process to succeed, we configure a dataset specifically for this task. We demonstrate that with this method, it is possible to achieve a significant reduction in computational cost, while maintaining an accurate solution. A reference implementation accompanies the paper as well as documentation and code for dataset reproduction. Niv Giladi, Zvika Ben-Haim, Sella Nevo, Yossi Matias, Daniel Soudry |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Augment Your Batch: Improving Generalization Through Instance RepetitionabstractLarge-batch SGD is important for scaling training of deep neural networks. However, without fine-tuning hyperparameter schedules, the generalization of the model may be hampered. We propose to use batch augmentation: replicating instances of samples within the same batch with different data augmentations. Batch augmentation acts as a regularizer and an accelerator, increasing both generalization and performance scaling for a fixed budget of optimization steps. We analyze the effect of batch augmentation on gradient variance and show that it empirically improves convergence for a wide variety of networks and datasets. Our results show that batch augmentation reduces the number of necessary SGD updates to achieve the same accuracy as the state-of-the-art. Overall, this simple yet effective method enables faster training and better generalization by allowing more computational resources to be used concurrently. Elad Hoffer, Tal Ben-Nun, Itay Hubara, Niv Giladi, Torsten Hoefler, Daniel Soudry |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2020 | At Stability's Edge: How to Adjust Hyperparameters to Preserve Minima Selection in Asynchronous Training of Neural Networks?
Niv Giladi, Mor Shpigel Nacson, Elad Hoffer, Daniel Soudry |
ICLR | 1 |