Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rixon Crane

dblp:234/8796 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.412020
DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
distributed newton-type methods
0.412020
DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization
0.412020
DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
finite-sum optimization
0.412020
DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.412020
DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization
0.412019
DINGO: Distributed Newton-Type Method for Gradient-Norm Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning › distributed training
communication-efficient distributed training
0.112020
DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning
0.112020
DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020
Distributed systems › distributed optimization
communication-efficient optimization
0.112019
DINGO: Distributed Newton-Type Method for Gradient-Norm Optimization · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polyak-lojasiewicz inequality · 0.9newton's method · 0.9newton-type method · 0.8linear least squares · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method
abstract
We present a novel communication-efficient Newton-type algorithm for finite-sum optimization over a distributed computing environment. Our method, named DINO, overcomes both theoretical and practical shortcomings of similar existing methods. Under minimal assumptions, we guarantee global sub-linear convergence of DINO to a first-order stationary point for general non-convex functions and arbitrary data distribution over the network. Furthermore, for functions satisfying Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) inequality, we show that DINO enjoys a linear convergence rate. Our proposed algorithm is practically parameter free, in that it will converge regardless of the selected hyper-parameters, which are easy to tune. Additionally, its sub-problems are simple linear least-squares, for which efficient solvers exist, and numerical simulations demonstrate the efficiency of DINO as compared with similar alternatives.
Rixon Crane, Fred (Farbod) Roosta
ICML1
2019 DINGO: Distributed Newton-Type Method for Gradient-Norm Optimization
abstract
For optimization of a large sum of functions in a distributed computing environment, we present a novel communication efficient Newton-type algorithm that enjoys a variety of advantages over similar existing methods. Our algorithm, DINGO, is derived by optimization of the gradient's norm as a surrogate function. DINGO does not impose any specific form on the underlying functions and its application range extends far beyond convexity and smoothness. The underlying sub-problems of DINGO are simple linear least-squares, for which a plethora of efficient algorithms exist. DINGO involves a few hyper-parameters that are easy to tune and we theoretically show that a strict reduction in the surrogate objective is guaranteed, regardless of the selected hyper-parameters.
Rixon Crane, Fred (Farbod) Roosta
NeurIPS1