Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rixon Crane
dblp:234/8796
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
distributed newton-type methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
finite-sum optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | DINGO: Distributed Newton-Type Method for Gradient-Norm Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning › distributed training
communication-efficient distributed training |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020 |
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization Method · ICML 2020 |
Distributed systems › distributed optimization
communication-efficient optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | DINGO: Distributed Newton-Type Method for Gradient-Norm Optimization · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polyak-lojasiewicz inequality · 0.9newton's method · 0.9newton-type method · 0.8linear least squares · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | DINO: Distributed Newton-Type Optimization MethodabstractWe present a novel communication-efficient Newton-type algorithm for finite-sum optimization over a distributed computing environment. Our method, named DINO, overcomes both theoretical and practical shortcomings of similar existing methods. Under minimal assumptions, we guarantee global sub-linear convergence of DINO to a first-order stationary point for general non-convex functions and arbitrary data distribution over the network. Furthermore, for functions satisfying Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) inequality, we show that DINO enjoys a linear convergence rate. Our proposed algorithm is practically parameter free, in that it will converge regardless of the selected hyper-parameters, which are easy to tune. Additionally, its sub-problems are simple linear least-squares, for which efficient solvers exist, and numerical simulations demonstrate the efficiency of DINO as compared with similar alternatives. Rixon Crane, Fred (Farbod) Roosta |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | DINGO: Distributed Newton-Type Method for Gradient-Norm OptimizationabstractFor optimization of a large sum of functions in a distributed computing environment, we present a novel communication efficient Newton-type algorithm that enjoys a variety of advantages over similar existing methods. Our algorithm, DINGO, is derived by optimization of the gradient's norm as a surrogate function. DINGO does not impose any specific form on the underlying functions and its application range extends far beyond convexity and smoothness. The underlying sub-problems of DINGO are simple linear least-squares, for which a plethora of efficient algorithms exist. DINGO involves a few hyper-parameters that are easy to tune and we theoretically show that a strict reduction in the surrogate objective is guaranteed, regardless of the selected hyper-parameters. Rixon Crane, Fred (Farbod) Roosta |
NeurIPS | 1 |