Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ahsan S. Alvi

dblp:234/8854 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 83% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 17%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
bayesian optimization
0.412020
Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization
0.412020
Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.412020
Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.412020
Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.412020
Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit
0.412020
Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization
0.412019
Asynchronous Batch Bayesian Optimisation with Improved Local Penalisation · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.412019
Asynchronous Batch Bayesian Optimisation with Improved Local Penalisation · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-armed bandit · 0.4gaussian process · 0.4batch selection · 0.4local penalisation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs
abstract
Efficient optimisation of black-box problems that comprise both continuous and categorical inputs is important, yet poses significant challenges. Current approaches, like one-hot encoding, severely increase the dimension of the search space, while separate modelling of category-specific data is sample-inefficient. Both frameworks are not scalable to practical applications involving multiple categorical variables, each with multiple possible values. We propose a new approach, Continuous and Categorical Bayesian Optimisation (CoCaBO), which combines the strengths of multi-armed bandits and Bayesian optimisation to select values for both categorical and continuous inputs. We model this mixed-type space using a Gaussian Process kernel, designed to allow sharing of information across multiple categorical variables; this allows CoCaBO to leverage all available data efficiently. We extend our method to the batch setting and propose an efficient selection procedure that dynamically balances exploration and exploitation whilst encouraging batch diversity. We demonstrate empirically that our method outperforms existing approaches on both synthetic and real-world optimisation tasks with continuous and categorical inputs.
Bin Xin Ru, Ahsan S. Alvi, Michael A. Osborne, Stephen J. Roberts
ICML2
2019 Asynchronous Batch Bayesian Optimisation with Improved Local Penalisation
abstract
Batch Bayesian optimisation (BO) has been successfully applied to hyperparameter tuning using parallel computing, but it is wasteful of resources: workers that complete jobs ahead of others are left idle. We address this problem by developing an approach, Penalising Locally for Asynchronous Bayesian Optimisation on K Workers (PLAyBOOK), for asynchronous parallel BO. We demonstrate empirically the efficacy of PLAyBOOK and its variants on synthetic tasks and a real-world problem. We undertake a comparison between synchronous and asynchronous BO, and show that asynchronous BO often outperforms synchronous batch BO in both wall-clock time and sample efficiency.
Ahsan S. Alvi, Bin Xin Ru, Jan-P. Calliess, Stephen J. Roberts, Michael A. Osborne
ICML1