Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ahsan S. Alvi
dblp:234/8854
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 83% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 17% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Asynchronous Batch Bayesian Optimisation with Improved Local Penalisation · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Asynchronous Batch Bayesian Optimisation with Improved Local Penalisation · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-armed bandit · 0.4gaussian process · 0.4batch selection · 0.4local penalisation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical InputsabstractEfficient optimisation of black-box problems that comprise both continuous and categorical inputs is important, yet poses significant challenges. Current approaches, like one-hot encoding, severely increase the dimension of the search space, while separate modelling of category-specific data is sample-inefficient. Both frameworks are not scalable to practical applications involving multiple categorical variables, each with multiple possible values. We propose a new approach, Continuous and Categorical Bayesian Optimisation (CoCaBO), which combines the strengths of multi-armed bandits and Bayesian optimisation to select values for both categorical and continuous inputs. We model this mixed-type space using a Gaussian Process kernel, designed to allow sharing of information across multiple categorical variables; this allows CoCaBO to leverage all available data efficiently. We extend our method to the batch setting and propose an efficient selection procedure that dynamically balances exploration and exploitation whilst encouraging batch diversity. We demonstrate empirically that our method outperforms existing approaches on both synthetic and real-world optimisation tasks with continuous and categorical inputs. Bin Xin Ru, Ahsan S. Alvi, Michael A. Osborne, Stephen J. Roberts |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | Asynchronous Batch Bayesian Optimisation with Improved Local PenalisationabstractBatch Bayesian optimisation (BO) has been successfully applied to hyperparameter tuning using parallel computing, but it is wasteful of resources: workers that complete jobs ahead of others are left idle. We address this problem by developing an approach, Penalising Locally for Asynchronous Bayesian Optimisation on K Workers (PLAyBOOK), for asynchronous parallel BO. We demonstrate empirically the efficacy of PLAyBOOK and its variants on synthetic tasks and a real-world problem. We undertake a comparison between synchronous and asynchronous BO, and show that asynchronous BO often outperforms synchronous batch BO in both wall-clock time and sample efficiency. Ahsan S. Alvi, Bin Xin Ru, Jan-P. Calliess, Stephen J. Roberts, Michael A. Osborne |
ICML | 1 |