Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yukun Liang

dblp:234/9338 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0008-5091-5942ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Query processing and optimization · 33% Database system architecture and tuning · 26% Distributed and cloud data management · 26%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed and cloud data management › cloud database
cloud-native database
0.712023
PolarDB-IMCI: A Cloud-Native HTAP Database System at Alibaba · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Database system architecture and tuning
hybrid transactional and analytical processing
0.712023
PolarDB-IMCI: A Cloud-Native HTAP Database System at Alibaba · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Indexing and storage engines
column store
0.212023
ROVEC: Runtime Optimization of Vectorized Expression Evaluation for Column Store · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Query processing and optimization
OLAP
0.212023
PolarDB-IMCI: A Cloud-Native HTAP Database System at Alibaba · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Transaction processing and concurrency control
OLTP
0.212023
PolarDB-IMCI: A Cloud-Native HTAP Database System at Alibaba · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

run-time optimization · 0.7lightweight compression · 0.7fine-grained statistics · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Manned and Unmanned Collaborative Combat
abstract
With the extensive application of unmanned systems in the military domain, human-unmanned collaborative combat has become an important mode of warfare. However, accurately assessing the effectiveness of collaborative combat remains a challenging issue. This paper presents an assessment framework based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, which can assist decision-makers in better understanding and evaluating the outcomes of human-unmanned collaborative combat. To validate the effectiveness of this framework, we conducted empirical research and analyzed the assessment results. Through case analysis, we found that this method can accurately assess the efficiency of human-unmanned collaborative combat and provide valuable decision support for policymakers.
Chengjia Yu, Yukun Liang
CSCWD4
2023 PolarDB-IMCI: A Cloud-Native HTAP Database System at Alibaba
abstract
Cloud-native databases have become the de-facto choice for mission-critical applications on the cloud due to the need for high availability, resource elasticity, and cost efficiency. Meanwhile, driven by the increasing connectivity between data generation and analysis, users prefer a single database to efficiently process both OLTP and OLAP workloads, which enhances data freshness and reduces the complexity of data synchronization and the overall business cost. In this paper, we summarize five crucial design goals for a cloud-native HTAP database based on our experience and customers' feedback, i.e., transparency, competitive OLAP performance, minimal perturbation on OLTP workloads, high data freshness, and excellent resource elasticity. As our solution to realize these goals, we present PolarDB-IMCI, a cloud-native HTAP database system designed and deployed at Alibaba Cloud. Our evaluation results show that PolarDB-IMCI is able to handle HTAP efficiently on both experimental and production workloads; notably, it speeds up analytical queries up to ×149 on TPC-H (100GB). PolarDB-IMCI introduces low visibility delay and little performance perturbation on OLTP workloads (<5%), and resource elasticity can be achieved by scaling out in tens of seconds.
Tongliang Li, Haoze Song, Xinjun Yang, Wenchao Zhou, Feifei Li 0001, Baoyue Yan, Qianqian Wu 0007, Yukun Liang, Chengjun Ying, Baokai Chen, Yubin Ruan, Xiaoyi Weng, Shibin Chen, Chengzhong Yang, Hongyan Xing, Nanlong Yu, Dapeng Huang, Jianling Sun
Proc. ACM Manag. Data9
2023 ROVEC: Runtime Optimization of Vectorized Expression Evaluation for Column Store
abstract
Due to the increasing demand for scalable and interactive data analytics, column stores have become the de-facto choice in many analytical databases. As a common and fundamental operation in column stores, expression evaluation has a remarkable effect on many queries. To speed up expression evaluation, vectorized techniques such as Single-Instruction-Multiple-Data (SIMD) instructions are widely used. However, there are few works concerning dedicated optimizations for SIMD-based expression evaluation for column stores. In this paper, we propose a runtime optimization framework named ROVEC that enables effective optimizations for SIMD-based expression evaluation. The key idea is to optimize logical expression at execution time, by leveraging lightweight compression and fine-grained statistics associated with the compressed data. ROVEC removes unnecessary type casting and finds the tightest type during evaluation, which maximizes the concurrent operands in SIMD instructions. ROVEC can be applied to many expression-evaluation-intensive operators (e.g., table scan and theta join) for different data types (e.g., numeric, time and string). To validate the effectiveness of ROVEC, we integrate it into a columnar database PolarDB-C. Our evaluation results show that ROVEC improves up to 120% (60% on average) throughput of table scan and up to 50% (30% on average) latency of theta join.
Meng Li 0010, Zheyu Miao, Feifei Li 0001, Sheng Wang 0011, Wei Cao 0006, Yubin Ruan, Yukun Liang, Jimmy Yang, Haipeng Dai 0001, Guihai Chen
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.9